Cache only the advance filters

[AshrafMd-1]

Proposed Changes

• Fixes Cache only the advance filters across the platform #6891
• Added primary searches to blacklist so no cache is stored

@coronasafe/care-fe-code-reviewers @coronasafe/code-reviewers

Merge Checklist

• Add specs that demonstrate bug / test a new feature.
• Update product documentation.
• Ensure that UI text is kept in I18n files.
• Prep screenshot or demo video for changelog entry, and attach it to issue.
• Request for Peer Reviews
• Completion of QA

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
care-storybook	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Jan 16, 2024 2:47pm

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for care-egov-staging ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	39881b3
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/care-egov-staging/deploys/65a696c6d4c25000087e4e69
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-6988--care-egov-staging.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[rithviknishad]

just some minor issues

[rithviknishad]

Everything LGTM.

Except skip keeping cacheBlacklist as an arg of updateFiltersCache.
Instead:

• Skip passing cacheBlacklist as an arg to updateFitlersCache, there's no need for it to sit there.
• Concat the cache blacklist outside the updateFiltersCache, because you need not keep concating everytime the function is invoked, you can just execute it while the useFilters hook runs.

[AshrafMd-1]

@rithviknishad is this okay or are there any changes

[github-actions]

👋 Hi, @AshrafMd-1,
Conflicts have been detected against the base branch. Please rebase your branch against the base branch.

---

This message is automatically generated by prince-chrismc/label-merge-conflicts-action so don't hesitate to report issues/improvements there.

[rithviknishad]

@AshrafMd-1 was the filters cache working in your PR? How were you able to test whether this PR was working or not?

[AshrafMd-1]

It wasn't working. Even when I tested it
I was looking at local storage to find if the variable is stored or not

[rithviknishad]

No worries, #7009 would fix it. Once it's merged, you could rebase so that @nihal467 could test this out

[github-actions]

👋 Hi, @AshrafMd-1,
Conflicts have been detected against the base branch. Please rebase your branch against the base branch.

---

This message is automatically generated by prince-chrismc/label-merge-conflicts-action so don't hesitate to report issues/improvements there.

[nihal467]

@AshrafMd-1 fix the cypress test

[rithviknishad]

@AshrafMd-1 the lint checks are failing

[AshrafMd-1]

@rithviknishad @nihal467 done

[nihal467]

LGTM

[github-actions]

@AshrafMd-1 We truly appreciate your efforts. Thank you for taking the time to contribute; this is a very valuable contribution to us 🥇. We always welcome your contribution 🙂, so feel free to contribute to anything anytime, and never lose that spirit of innovation 🙌.