-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Discovery: OpenAPI spec for server and client #2584
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Comment from roadmap update: rename it to DiscoveryService
docs/_static/usecase/v1.yaml
Outdated
get: | ||
summary: Searches a for presentations on the usecase list. | ||
description: | | ||
An API of the use case client that searches a for presentations on the usecase list, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it's a bit weird to have the client and server api on the same path. Before a client can use it as registry some additional work has to be done (did service resolving). I think the result of the list should feed into the same registry as the network for now. An api can be added later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Then we have to build pruning into that store (it's the "VCR store") as well. Maybe we should just search in both stores. Although the current VCR search does not know about the discovery service IDs, so you don't know in which service to search.
Perhaps search in all of them, and deduplicate results?
docs/_static/usecase/v1.yaml
Outdated
VerifiablePresentation: | ||
$ref: "../common/ssi_types.yaml#/components/schemas/VerifiablePresentation" | ||
securitySchemes: | ||
jwtBearerAuth: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
security is indeed a question. But'll probably not be a bearer jwt.
the add and delete are "protected" by the VP, what additional protection should we add?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure we need any additional protection; the "get" is a cheap operation, and to register a VP you need a VC that matches the presentation definition of the service. Risk would be DoS attacks?
No description provided.