-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 128
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DRAFT: add 'gene' feature capture when reading genbank files #1435
Draft
j23414
wants to merge
2
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
add-gene-features-capture-for-genbank
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To reduce the chances of this introducing unexpected changes to current usage, I'd suggest an approach where we only use 'gene' features if the corresponding 'CDS' feature doesn't exist. There's a few different ways to implement this, but the simplest may be to use an extra loop through
gb.features
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Continuing this discussion based on nextstrain/rsv#55 (comment):
Theoretically CDSs are what we want, but we have GenBank files which use "gene" instead. I can't think of a situation where we want to extract both from the same genbank reference¹. One option is to look for 'gene' only if no CDSs are found. Another is to expose this as a command line argument to augur.
¹ I'm sure there are exceptions to this, in which case I think the onus is on the user to edit the GenBank file upstream of Augur.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this something where we need to poll users to vote for "CDS" or "gene"? Or it sounds like we're pretty sure it's "CDS"?
Ah, I could get behind having a command line argument
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We're sure we want to use CDS, this is what we're moving towards as only CDSes allow complex annotations like ribosomal slippage etc. Nextclade v3 uses CDS moving forward, we've made similar changes for auspice