Switching to Ruff for linting/codestyle and Mkdocs for documentation

[senthurayyappan]

Description

Better tooling for linting and code style.

Type of Change

• 📚 Examples / docs / tutorials / dependencies update
• 🔧 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• 🥂 Improvement (non-breaking change which improves an existing feature)
• 🚀 New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• 💥 Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• 🔐 Security fix

Checklist

• I've read the CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md document.
• I've read the CONTRIBUTING.md guide.
• I've updated the code style using make codestyle.
• I've written tests for all new methods and classes that I created.
• I've written the docstring in Google format for all the methods and classes that I used.

Copilot reviewed 112 out of 127 changed files in this pull request and generated no suggestions.

Files not reviewed (15)

• .devcontainer/devcontainer.json: Language not supported
• .devcontainer/postCreateCommand.sh: Language not supported
• .editorconfig: Language not supported
• .github/.stale.yml: Language not supported
• .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml: Language not supported
• .github/dependabot.yml: Language not supported
• .github/release-drafter.yml: Language not supported
• .github/workflows/build.yml: Language not supported
• .github/workflows/greetings.yml: Language not supported
• .github/workflows/release-drafter.yml: Language not supported
• .readthedocs.yaml: Language not supported
• .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md: Evaluated as low risk
• .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md: Evaluated as low risk
• .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/question.md: Evaluated as low risk
• .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md: Evaluated as low risk