-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Amend schema to accomodate curation-based meta-platforms #34
Comments
I think this strongly depends on the signals of the curation platform. E.g. if we had a platform that was aggregating likes e.g. musicos, then I think it'd be interesting if the neume network track object would feature the likes as a stat somewhere. |
Right, so the semantics of the curation platform matter. E.g. does this curation signal represent a like, a release, or something else. |
My goal in this issue was to find a way to permit multiple platforms per NFT. E.g. in Future Tape, present materials is represented as a tag. Since each track can have many tags this easily supports many platforms per track via tags. This does not affect the minting platform, of which there can be only one. I like the flexibility of this approach and think it could work well for neume and musicOS too. That said, something a bit richer than string tags may be useful. E.g. to identify that a tag represents a platform. |
With curation-based platforms—like present materials and release club—comes the possibility of any NFT being associated with multiple platforms. The schema does not currently support this, as each NFT is associated with a single platform. There are multiple ways of thinking about this and some discussion will be needed to find the right solution.
For starters:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: