Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding count rate in core #127

Closed
wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

Vidushi-GitHub
Copy link
Member

One property of the Einstein Probe is useful for various missions - net count rate.
However, it requires a consistent definition for other teams as well.
Example, some teams report count/s with background subtraction, others report count rates with background.
To ensure consistency, it would be beneficial for the GCN team to standardize this property.

gcn/notices/core/Statistics.schema.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@lpsinger lpsinger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, but I'd at least like @jracusin to also review this.

@Vidushi-GitHub Vidushi-GitHub requested review from jracusin and removed request for jracusin March 8, 2024 19:25
@Vidushi-GitHub
Copy link
Member Author

@jracusin please check this PR.

@@ -9,6 +9,14 @@
"type": "number",
"description": "False alarm rate: the rate of occurrence of non-astrophysical events that are of the same intensity or significance as the current event [Hz]"
},
"net_count_rate": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Net count rate of the transient above the background [counts/s]"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The description should specify that this is over the rate_duration and rate_energy_range.

},
"backgound_count_rate": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Count rate of the background for the transient [counts/s]"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same comment about rate_duration and rate_energy_range as in the net_count_rate.

},
"backgound_count_rate": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Count rate of the background for the transient [counts/s] over rate_duration and rate_energy_range."
Copy link
Member Author

@Vidushi-GitHub Vidushi-GitHub Mar 12, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
"description": "Count rate of the background for the transient [counts/s] over rate_duration and rate_energy_range."
"description": "Count rate of the background for the transient [counts/s] over backgound rate duration and rate energy range."

Copy link
Member Author

@Vidushi-GitHub Vidushi-GitHub Mar 12, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jracusin we can't use same rate_duration property for the background. However we can add background time range array.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The background rate comes from using multiple intervals, but it is used to estimate the background during the source interval. I think this use is fine.

@Vidushi-GitHub Vidushi-GitHub requested a review from jracusin March 12, 2024 11:53
"backgound_count_rate": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Count rate of the background for the transient [counts/s] over rate_duration and rate_energy_range."
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do not think we need to include this.

@Vidushi-GitHub
Copy link
Member Author

@jracusin background time intervals removed. Is everything else approved?

@Vidushi-GitHub
Copy link
Member Author

Rebasing had some issues and we should notify these changes to Einstein Probe soon, so opened a new PR #136 and closing this.

@Vidushi-GitHub Vidushi-GitHub deleted the vidushi/counts branch March 26, 2024 20:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants