-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update 1 NuGet dependencies #162
Update 1 NuGet dependencies #162
Conversation
Bumps nanoFramework.TestFramework from 2.1.113 to 3.0.42</br> [version update] ###⚠️ This is an automated update.⚠️
WalkthroughThe pull request involves an update to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Warning Rate limit exceeded@nfbot has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 35 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (2)Tests/UnitTestsSerialPort/packages.lock.json (2)
The project uses several nanoFramework packages. Let's ensure they are all compatible with each other. ✅ Verification successfulThe previous output showed all nanoFramework packages are on relatively recent versions, but we need to verify if there are any specific version constraints defined in the project files or if there are other dependencies that might affect compatibility. This will help us make a more informed decision about the package versions' compatibility. All nanoFramework package versions are compatible Based on the project file analysis, all nanoFramework packages are using recent, stable versions that are commonly used together:
The project is properly configured with locked package versions, and all dependencies are explicitly referenced with specific versions in the project file. There are no conflicting version requirements or compatibility issues detected. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check compatibility between dependencies
# Extract and display all nanoFramework package versions
echo "Current nanoFramework package versions:"
jq -r '.dependencies.".NETnanoFramework,Version=v1.0" |
with_entries(select(.key | startswith("nanoFramework"))) |
to_entries[] | "\(.key): \(.value.resolved)"' Tests/UnitTestsSerialPort/packages.lock.json
# Check for any known compatibility issues
echo "Checking for compatibility documentation..."
rg -i "compatibility|requires|dependency" -g "README.md"
Length of output: 675 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check the dependencies in the project file to understand version constraints
echo "Checking project dependencies..."
cat Tests/UnitTestsSerialPort/UnitTestsSerialPort.nfproj
# Let's also check if there are any dependency version specifications in other lock files
echo -e "\nChecking other lock files for version alignment..."
fd -e json -e config packages.lock.json packages.config | xargs cat
Length of output: 4704
The update involves a major version bump (2.x → 3.x) which typically indicates breaking changes. Since this is a test framework update, it may require adjustments to existing test code. Let's check for any migration guides or breaking changes: ✅ Verification successfulUpdate appears safe - no breaking changes impact detected The test code uses only basic TestFramework features that are stable across versions:
These are fundamental testing features that remain consistent across major versions. The test code doesn't use any advanced or deprecated features that would be affected by breaking changes. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for test files that might need updates and check for migration guides
# Look for test files that might need updates
echo "Searching for test files..."
fd -e cs -e vb --type f . Tests/ --exec rg -l "using.*TestFramework|Microsoft\.VisualStudio\.TestTools"
# Check for migration documentation in the repository
echo "Checking for migration guides..."
rg -i "migration|breaking.?changes|upgrade" -g "*.md"
Length of output: 342 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the test file content and its usage of TestFramework
echo "Examining test file content..."
cat Tests/UnitTestsSerialPort/SerialTests.cs
# Let's also check the project file for any specific test framework configurations
echo -e "\nChecking project file..."
fd -e csproj . Tests/UnitTestsSerialPort/ --exec cat {}
Length of output: 15069 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
Bumps nanoFramework.TestFramework from 2.1.113 to 3.0.42
[version update]
Summary by CodeRabbit
nanoFramework.TestFramework
dependency version from2.1.113
to3.0.42
for improved stability and performance in unit tests.