Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update 1 NuGet dependencies #120

Merged

Conversation

nfbot
Copy link
Member

@nfbot nfbot commented Dec 13, 2024

Bumps Nerdbank.GitVersioning from 3.6.146 to 3.7.112

[version update]

⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the dependency version for Nerdbank.GitVersioning to enhance compatibility and performance.

Bumps Nerdbank.GitVersioning from 3.6.146 to 3.7.112</br>
[version update]

### ⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request involves updating the Nerdbank.GitVersioning dependency version in the System.IO.FileSystem/packages.lock.json file. The version has been upgraded from 3.6.146 to 3.7.112, which includes an update to the content hash to reflect the new version.

Changes

File Change Summary
System.IO.FileSystem/packages.lock.json Updated Nerdbank.GitVersioning dependency version from 3.6.146 to 3.7.112

Suggested labels

Type: dependencies


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8b6b285 and ee0f753.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • System.IO.FileSystem/System.IO.FileSystem.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • System.IO.FileSystem/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • System.IO.FileSystem/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
System.IO.FileSystem/packages.lock.json (1)

37-39: LGTM! Verify compatibility with the minor version bump.

The update from Nerdbank.GitVersioning 3.6.146 to 3.7.112 is consistent with the PR objectives. Since this is a minor version bump (3.6.x -> 3.7.x), it should maintain backward compatibility according to semantic versioning.

Run the following script to check for any breaking changes or known issues:

✅ Verification successful

Let me try another approach to gather information about potential breaking changes.


Let me check the version.json file to understand how the versioning is configured.


Nerdbank.GitVersioning update looks safe to proceed

Based on the analysis:

  1. The package is used as a development dependency for version management
  2. The version.json configuration shows standard versioning setup without any custom or complex configurations
  3. No breaking changes or issues were found for version 3.7.x
  4. The update maintains semantic versioning principles (3.6.x -> 3.7.x)

The package is primarily used for version management during build time, and the minor version bump should maintain backward compatibility. The version.json configuration will continue to work with the new version as it follows the same schema.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check release notes and issues for breaking changes

# Check for release notes or changelog
fd -g "CHANGELOG.md" -g "ReleaseNotes.md"

# Check for any open issues related to version 3.7.x
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  search(query: "repo:dotnet/Nerdbank.GitVersioning is:issue label:breaking-change milestone:3.7", type: ISSUE, first: 10) {
    nodes {
      ... on Issue {
        title
        url
        labels(first: 5) {
          nodes {
            name
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}'

Length of output: 494


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for version-related configuration files and package references
fd -e json -e props -e csproj | xargs rg -l "Nerdbank.GitVersioning"

# Search for any version.json files which might contain version configuration
fd "version.json"

# Look for any direct references or usages of Nerdbank.GitVersioning
rg -i "gitversioning" -g "!{*.json,*.lock}"

Length of output: 1452


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check version.json content
cat version.json

# Check if there are any specific build configurations or settings
rg -A 5 "Nerdbank.GitVersioning" -g "*.props" -g "*.targets"

Length of output: 801


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@josesimoes
Copy link
Member

@nfbot updatedependencies

@nfbot nfbot merged commit 5107013 into main Dec 26, 2024
6 checks passed
@nfbot nfbot deleted the nfbot/update-dependencies/3295bbc4-43f6-4af6-8ba6-dea643469d93 branch December 26, 2024 09:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants