Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update 1 NuGet dependencies #119

Merged

Conversation

nfbot
Copy link
Member

@nfbot nfbot commented Nov 29, 2024

Bumps nanoFramework.TestFramework from 3.0.45 to 3.0.47

[version update]

⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the nanoFramework.TestFramework dependency version from 3.0.45 to 3.0.47 for improved functionality and performance.

Bumps nanoFramework.TestFramework from 3.0.45 to 3.0.47</br>
[version update]

### ⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 29, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request includes an update to the packages.lock.json file for the System.IO.FileSystem.UnitTests project. The primary modification is the version increment of the nanoFramework.TestFramework dependency from 3.0.45 to 3.0.47, along with an updated content hash for this dependency. No other changes were made to the dependencies or structure of the JSON file.

Changes

File Change Summary
System.IO.FileSystem.UnitTests/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.TestFramework version from 3.0.45 to 3.0.47 and updated content hash.

Possibly related PRs

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@nfbot has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 28 minutes and 30 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 61781e6 and 8f6fb1c.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 61781e6 and 8f6fb1c.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • System.IO.FileSystem.UnitTests/System.IO.FileSystem.UnitTests.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • System.IO.FileSystem.UnitTests/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • System.IO.FileSystem.UnitTests/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
System.IO.FileSystem.UnitTests/packages.lock.json (1)

25-27: LGTM! Clean dependency update.

The version bump of nanoFramework.TestFramework from 3.0.45 to 3.0.47 is consistent with the PR objectives.

Let's verify compatibility with other dependencies:

✅ Verification successful

Dependency update verified and compatible

The version update of nanoFramework.TestFramework to 3.0.47 is compatible with the existing dependencies. The packages.config files show:

  • TestFramework is marked as a development dependency
  • All other core dependencies are at their specified versions:
    • CoreLibrary: 1.15.5
    • System.IO.Streams: 1.1.59
    • System.Text: 1.2.54
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any compatibility issues or breaking changes between TestFramework versions

# Look for any dependency constraints or version requirements in project files
rg -l --type xml "nanoFramework\.TestFramework" | xargs cat

# Check for any explicit version constraints in Directory.Build.props if it exists
fd "Directory.Build.props" --type f --exec cat {} \; 

Length of output: 266


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find project files and dependencies

# Find all csproj files that might reference TestFramework
fd "\.csproj$" --type f --exec cat {} \;

# Also check packages.config files
fd "packages\.config$" --type f --exec cat {} \;

# Check Directory.Packages.props if it exists (common in .NET projects)
fd "Directory\.Packages\.props$" --type f --exec cat {} \;

# Look for any global.json
fd "global\.json$" --type f --exec cat {} \;

Length of output: 1324


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@nfbot nfbot merged commit cf73b3a into main Nov 29, 2024
6 checks passed
@nfbot nfbot deleted the nfbot/update-dependencies/8c8052cd-e870-4187-ac5d-54c1d51e1d51 branch November 29, 2024 00:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant