-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Do Not Merge] PoC for shell-api autocomplete type definitions #1802
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
```sh cd packages/shell-api && \ npm run compile && \ npx api-extractor run ; \ npx ts-node bin/api-postprocess.ts ; \ cat lib/api-processed.d.ts ```
getCollection(name: string): Collection { | ||
getCollection<KD extends StringKey<M>, KC extends StringKey<M[KD]>>( | ||
name: `${KD}.${KC}` | ||
): Collection<M, M[KD], M[KD][KC]> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kmruiz Wanted to highlight this, doubt many people will actually use .getCollection()
on a Mongo object ... but this is interesting, TS is not able to autocomplete the name
argument for me (which, like, fair enough), but if I pass a valid <db>.<collection>
namespace, it will return a collection with the correct schema, kind of interesting that it only partially works
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That feels like a bug right? If I recall, it should be able to autocomplete on string templates. But yeah everyone will use db.collection
as you said, I don't see any reason now for not suggesting the usage of collections using property access instead of getCollection.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's struggling a bit with the fact that the second part (collection name) after the .
depends on the first part (database name)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense, this seems like a hard problem to solve for a compiler to be fair.
(api-extractor will dump a ton of errors)