Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MONDO:0015265 'bronchiolitis obliterans with obstructive pulmonary disease' #5260

Closed
nicolevasilevsky opened this issue Aug 10, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #5884
Closed

Comments

@nicolevasilevsky
Copy link
Member

The definition does not match the label.
Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is a lung disorder that is mainly associated with chronic allograft dysfunction after lung transplantation and that is characterized by inflammation and fibrosis of bronchiolar walls that reduce the diameter of the bronchioles and result in progressive and irreversible airflow obstruction.

The label should be:
bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome

Comment:
This is restricted to lung transplant patients.

NCIT:C62580 is not necessarily a disease; it's a phenotype. Should not be equivalent.

@nicolevasilevsky
Copy link
Member Author

nicolevasilevsky commented Aug 10, 2022

Do we need an intermediate node that is called 'bronchiolitis characterized by bronchiolitis obliterans'? (We don't love the label)

this term 'Postinfectious bronchiolitis obliterans (PIBO)' would be a child of a term like this

@nicolevasilevsky nicolevasilevsky added this to the September release milestone Aug 10, 2022
@nicolevasilevsky
Copy link
Member Author

related to #5261

@nicolevasilevsky
Copy link
Member Author

I relabled MONDO:0015265 to bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and revised the synonyms and xref

nicolevasilevsky added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 8, 2023
* relabel bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome

close #5260

* fix xref

exclude superclass
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants