Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update mergify rules branch to regexp #642

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 29, 2023

Conversation

congqixia
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@sre-ci-robot sre-ci-robot requested review from sunby and yah01 December 29, 2023 10:30
@sre-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: congqixia

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@sre-ci-robot sre-ci-robot added the approved review approved label Dec 29, 2023
@congqixia
Copy link
Contributor Author

/kind enhancement

@sre-ci-robot sre-ci-robot added kind/enhancement New feature or request size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines. labels Dec 29, 2023
@mergify mergify bot added ci-passed auto merge needed label kind/workflow labels Dec 29, 2023
@yah01
Copy link
Member

yah01 commented Dec 29, 2023

/lgtm

@sre-ci-robot sre-ci-robot added the lgtm look good to me label Dec 29, 2023
@sre-ci-robot sre-ci-robot merged commit 1f1dc84 into milvus-io:master Dec 29, 2023
5 checks passed
@congqixia congqixia deleted the mergify_rules_regexp branch February 20, 2024 08:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved review approved ci-passed auto merge needed label kind/enhancement New feature or request kind/workflow lgtm look good to me size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants