Fix Graph rule ID associated with activation role setting #2 (identity-governance-pim-rules-overview.md) #9381
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In the "Activation rules" section, the setting marked as #2 seems to be mapped to the incorrect rule. Instead of "Enablement_Admin_Eligibility", it should be "Enablement_EndUser_Assignment". The 'Enforced for caller' column should likely also be updated to 'End User'.
This is further supported by a separate Learn page which shows how to correctly call this API: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/graph/how-to-pim-update-rules?tabs=http#example-2-update-the-justification-mfa-and-ticketing-rules-required-on-activation
For more context/repros, please see my Q&A post here: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/1656721/pim-activation-settings-for-an-entra-role-exposed
Instructions: Add any supporting information, such as a description of the PR changes, here.
Note
The following guidance is for Microsoft employees only. Community contributors can ignore this message; our content team will manage the status.
After you've created your PR, expand this section for tips and additional instructions.
#feedback-addressed
to the pull request.For more information, see the Content review process summary.