Release/0.14.2 #3375
Release/0.14.2 #3375
Conversation
shankarseal
requested review from
dthaler,
poornagmsft,
Alan-Jowett,
saxena-anurag,
dv-msft,
gtrevi,
shpalani,
matthewige,
mtfriesen and
rectified95
as code owners
…rosoft#3315) * Eliminate calls with FILE_FLAG_OVERLAPPED set, but no overlapped Signed-off-by: Alan Jowett (from Dev Box) <[email protected]> * PR feedback Signed-off-by: Alan Jowett (from Dev Box) <[email protected]> * PR feedback Signed-off-by: Alan Jowett (from Dev Box) <[email protected]> * PR feedback Signed-off-by: Alan Jowett <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: Alan Jowett (from Dev Box) <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alan Jowett <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Alan Jowett <[email protected]>
* Switch synchronous thread to thread_local storage Signed-off-by: Alan Jowett <[email protected]> * Add dedicated calls to cleanup device handles on thread attach/detach Signed-off-by: Alan Jowett <[email protected]> * Add dedicate test to stress device handling Signed-off-by: Alan Jowett <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: Alan Jowett <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Alan Jowett <[email protected]>
* fix * add tests * code cleanup * fix tests * cr comments * cr comments
shankarseal
force-pushed
the
release/0.14.2
branch
2 times, most recently
from
419dcdf to
d7cb523
Compare
shankarseal
force-pushed
the
release/0.14.2
branch
from
d7cb523 to
30833e1
Compare
3276 is not a bug fix it's an enhancement (it fixes #3275 which is clearly labeled as an enhancement not a bug fix). As such, this is not normally appropriate for cherry picking into a patch release of an already-released version per semantic versioning 2.0 which ebpf-for-windows says it follows. SemVer 2.0 does say
And so you can argue that since x==0 then you can even make breaking changes in a patch release, and that would be true. But the PR description currently does not even explain why one would want to put a non-bug fix into an existing release rather than bumping the minor version number. Please explain, since we should be getting into the habit of NOT doing this. |
|
Also #3330 seems to be an optimization not a bug fix. |
Description
This patch to v0.14 cherry-picks the following changes from main:
ebpf_id_table#3276Testing
CI/CD.
Documentation
No.
Installation
No.