-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 898
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added Differentiate3 to Interpolation #1093
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
74febe3
to
3cc5b65
Compare
I would like to see some unit tests for this. |
I tool a closer look into the tests and there aren't any tests for the Differentiate methods at all. |
Maybe we can start now having tests for it? |
3cc5b65
to
6115680
Compare
Ok, done ;) |
6115680
to
243d516
Compare
This is awesome, thank you |
/// </summary> | ||
/// <param name="t">Point t to interpolate at.</param> | ||
/// <returns>Interpolated third derivative at point t.</returns> | ||
double Differentiate3(double t); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Adding a method to IInterpolation is a breaking change since IInterpolation is a public interface that consumers of the library can and do implement.
Might be better to leave it out of the interface but keep the method for the classes for which the method is supported.
It’s been more than 2 years that the latest 5.0 release of the library has been published. I’m not the official maintainer but I wouldn’t have something against releasing a 5.1 version with this change among others (it’s adding a feature, not removing existing ones or changing functionality) |
It isn't a realy "breaking" change if one extend an interface. You can simply implement the method as not implemented. However, it could be make sence to introduce an IDifferentiableInterpolation in order to remove the SupportsDifferentiation property. |
No description provided.