Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix chain_node_builder and diva test func #350

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
Sep 11, 2023
Merged

fix chain_node_builder and diva test func #350

merged 25 commits into from
Sep 11, 2023

Conversation

lisab00
Copy link
Collaborator

@lisab00 lisab00 commented Sep 6, 2023

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 7, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #350 (9a74bf8) into master (1420953) will increase coverage by 0.26%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #350      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.96%   95.22%   +0.26%     
==========================================
  Files         129      129              
  Lines        4447     4464      +17     
==========================================
+ Hits         4223     4251      +28     
+ Misses        224      213      -11     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 95.22% <100.00%> (+0.26%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Changed Coverage Δ
domainlab/compos/pcr/request.py 89.47% <100.00%> (+1.97%) ⬆️
...omainlab/compos/vae/compos/encoder_xyd_parallel.py 90.90% <100.00%> (+0.90%) ⬆️
...omainlab/compos/vae/utils_request_chain_builder.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
domainlab/compos/vae/zoo_vae_builders_classif.py 92.45% <100.00%> (+1.54%) ⬆️

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@lisab00 lisab00 marked this pull request as ready for review September 7, 2023 15:03
@lisab00
Copy link
Collaborator Author

lisab00 commented Sep 7, 2023

You suggested to initialize the nets as ResNets. However, if I do I get an error, which I cannot resolve (see picture). So I used the ConvNet to make it work.

Screenshot 2023-09-07 141514

@lisab00 lisab00 requested a review from smilesun September 7, 2023 15:13
@store_args
def __init__(self, net_class_d, net_x, net_class_y, i_c, i_h, i_w):
"""net_class_d, net_x and net_class_y are neural networks defined by the user"""
pass
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

there is no need to use pass here, as long as there is documentation, it is fine, using pass will confuse the reader

@smilesun smilesun added the priority Further information is requested label Sep 7, 2023
@smilesun smilesun merged commit 5d2bdc7 into master Sep 11, 2023
1 check passed
@smilesun smilesun deleted the lb_fix_args branch September 11, 2023 12:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
priority Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants