Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve flexibility of geordi test #220

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 9, 2024

Conversation

brunosedler
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #216

@brunosedler brunosedler requested a review from codener June 14, 2024 12:28
@brunosedler brunosedler force-pushed the bs/improve-flexibility-of-geordi-tests branch from ab6b31b to 02a5a98 Compare June 14, 2024 12:37
Copy link
Member

@codener codener left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good so far! However, two requirements from the original issue #216 are missing:

  • Remember to update the LONGDESC as well.
  • It would be nice to have the results summary of both test commands printed last. However, I don't know how this could work. So please at least make sure that the RSpec status is printed after cucumber ran. Like "if rspec_ran and cucumber_ran then print RSpec success/failure" after the invocation of cucumber.

Or would RSpec already fail and Cucumber not even be executed?

features/tests.feature Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@brunosedler
Copy link
Contributor Author

* It would be nice to have the results summary of both test commands printed last. However, I don't know how this could work. So please at least make sure that the RSpec status is printed after cucumber ran. Like "if rspec_ran and cucumber_ran then print RSpec success/failure" after the invocation of cucumber.

Or would RSpec already fail and Cucumber not even be executed?

I assume if rspec fails, cucumber would not even be executed. That's the current behavior when all specs and features are running, and the code would be similar in the case when we run selected tests with rspec and cucumber. Maybe we could rescue the rspec-call if that feature is important to you 🤔

Copy link
Member

@codener codener left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I assume if rspec fails, cucumber would not even be executed. That's the current behavior

Ok, right. Fine then!

@brunosedler brunosedler force-pushed the bs/improve-flexibility-of-geordi-tests branch from 53a8291 to 1b6acb5 Compare July 9, 2024 07:33
@brunosedler brunosedler force-pushed the bs/improve-flexibility-of-geordi-tests branch from 1b6acb5 to 5995068 Compare July 9, 2024 07:43
@brunosedler brunosedler merged commit 5995068 into master Jul 9, 2024
3 checks passed
@brunosedler brunosedler deleted the bs/improve-flexibility-of-geordi-tests branch July 9, 2024 08:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improve flexibilty of geordi tests
2 participants