Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Initial attempt to refactor polyfills #809

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: development
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Initial attempt to refactor polyfills #809

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

alexs-mparticle
Copy link
Collaborator

Instructions

  1. PR target branch should be against development
  2. PR title name should follow this format: https://github.com/mParticle/mparticle-workflows/blob/main/.github/workflows/pr-title-check.yml
  3. PR branch prefix should follow this format: https://github.com/mParticle/mparticle-workflows/blob/main/.github/workflows/pr-branch-check-name.yml

Summary

  • {provide a thorough description of the changes}

Testing Plan

  • Was this tested locally? If not, explain why.
  • {explain how this has been tested, and what, if any, additional testing should be done}

Reference Issue (For mParticle employees only. Ignore if you are an outside contributor)

@sonarqubecloud SonarQubeCloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@alexs-mparticle alexs-mparticle force-pushed the development branch 3 times, most recently from 8d955f2 to 3f4f268 Compare January 2, 2024 17:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
backlog
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@alexs-mparticle @rmi22186