Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[opentitantool] Finish renaming legacy Google rescue protocol #20921

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2024

Conversation

jesultra
Copy link
Contributor

Previous generation of Google Titan security chips supported a UART "rescue" bootstrapping protocol. This PR ensures that that protocol is exclusively referred to as the "legacy rescue" protocol. This makes room for an implementation of the OpenTitan UART rescue protocol to be invoked by the short form --protocol=rescue.

Previous generation of Google Titan security chips supported a UART
"rescue" bootstrapping protocol.  This PR ensures that that protocol is
exclusively referred to as the "legacy rescue" protocol.  This makes
room for an implementation of the OpenTitan UART rescue protocol to be
invoked by the short form `--protocol=rescue`.

Change-Id: Ice36b21e1a44b55a32be963c8c47934a6799bf81
Signed-off-by: Jes B. Klinke <[email protected]>
@jesultra jesultra requested a review from cfrantz January 22, 2024 19:08
@jesultra jesultra marked this pull request as ready for review January 22, 2024 19:08
@jesultra jesultra requested a review from a team as a code owner January 22, 2024 19:08
@jesultra jesultra merged commit fdd149f into lowRISC:master Jan 23, 2024
32 checks passed
@timothytrippel timothytrippel added the CherryPick:earlgrey_es_sival This PR should be cherry-picked to earlgrey_es_sival label Feb 7, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2024

Successfully created backport PR for earlgrey_es_sival:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CherryPick:earlgrey_es_sival This PR should be cherry-picked to earlgrey_es_sival
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants