-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Get the Repo Public Release Ready #1
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks sensible to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is modified from NixOS/nixpkgs file which is MIT.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed
I wonder if we can dual license MIT/Apache-2 so that it's easier to upstream changes to nixpkgs |
That's a really good idea! |
Signed-off-by: Hugo McNally <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hugo McNally <[email protected]>
Now dual licensed MIT/Apache-2. I think MIT is necessary, we need to be able to upstream packages if we wish. |
The only thing I'm unsure of is the origin ofpkgs/python_ot/sitecustomize.py
. @nbdd0121 and @hcallahan-lowrisc is the license correct, i.e. is this our work?