This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 21, 2023. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is not intended to be merged, just showing off some experimentation that required a fork
This is a quick hack for getting some internal info from the queries. I used this to start building some graphs that show off the query flow.
note: for layout-circle the positions are random, not based on peerId, though I should do that next
a link means someone suggested someone as a closer peer or provider, or connects query initiator to initial peers
changing circle-layout to position by peerId will give an interesting look at how querys hone in on a result
It would be nice if possible to gather this info generically at the query layer, but here I put some extra info in the queryFn. When doing it all in the queryFn, the only thing missing was the initialPeers for the path. Though, in the end, I didn't need anything in the graph that was specific to a Path, but it could be helpful debugging and testing queries in the future.