Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add Opus protocol information (#897) #898

Merged

Conversation

KevinLatino
Copy link
Contributor

@KevinLatino KevinLatino commented Oct 21, 2024

Description

This Pull Request adds information regarding the Opus protocol, including details about its functionality and usage.

Changes Made

  • Implemented details related to the Opus protocol.
  • Adding the opus folder

Related Issue

Closes #897

Images

Captura de pantalla 2024-10-21 122635

Captura de pantalla 2024-10-21 122555

  1. Opus image (this is the .png example, but in the PR it is a .ico)
    opus

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 21, 2024

@KevinLatino is attempting to deploy a commit to the LFG Labs Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 21, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve the addition of a new entry for the opus application in the linkMap object within the utils/defi.ts file. This entry includes a URL for the "Strategies" action. The existing functions, getRedirectLink and formatStatsData, remain unchanged, maintaining their original logic and functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
utils/defi.ts Added a new entry for the opus application in the linkMap with a URL for "Strategies".

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add opus protocol to defi.ts linkMap const (#897)
Create an /opus/opus.ico folder and add the image (#897) The folder and image were not created or included.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
utils/defi.ts (1)

Line range hint 50-56: Consider updating getRedirectLink for consistency.

While the addition of the 'opus' entry is correct, the getRedirectLink function doesn't have a specific case for 'opus', unlike 'jediswap'. For consistency, you might want to consider if 'opus' needs special handling similar to 'jediswap'.

If you decide to add special handling for 'opus', you could update the function like this:

 export const getRedirectLink = (appName: string, actionType: string) => {
   if (appName.toLocaleLowerCase().includes("jediswap")) {
     if (actionType === "Provide Liquidity")
       return "https://app.jediswap.xyz/#/pools";
   }
+  if (appName.toLocaleLowerCase() === "opus") {
+    return "https://app.opus.money/";
+  }
   if (!linkMap[appName.toLowerCase()]) return "";
   return linkMap[appName.toLowerCase()][actionType] || "";
 };

This change would ensure that 'opus' is handled consistently with other special cases.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 41bb6d8 and 2debc7a.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
  • public/opus/opus.ico is excluded by !**/*.ico
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • utils/defi.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
utils/defi.ts (2)

Line range hint 1-138: Summary: Opus protocol successfully added

The changes in this file successfully implement the first objective of adding the Opus protocol to the defi.ts file. The addition is minimal, consistent with existing patterns, and doesn't introduce any apparent issues. The getRedirectLink and formatStatsData functions remain unchanged and should work correctly with the new 'opus' entry.

However, please note the following:

  1. Ensure the Opus URL is accessible as suggested in the verification script.
  2. Consider the suggestion about updating getRedirectLink for consistency, if deemed necessary.
  3. Don't forget to implement the second objective mentioned in issue Add Opus protocol infos #897: creating an /opus/ folder and adding the opus.ico image file.

46-48: LGTM! Opus entry added successfully.

The addition of the Opus protocol entry to the linkMap object is correct and consistent with the existing structure. The URL provided matches the one specified in the PR objectives.

To ensure the correctness of the URL, please run the following script:

This will check if the URL is accessible and returns a valid response.

✅ Verification successful

Verified! Opus entry URL is accessible.

The addition of the Opus protocol entry to the linkMap object has been successfully verified. The URL https://app.opus.money/ is accessible and returns a valid response.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the Opus URL
curl -I https://app.opus.money/

Length of output: 1631

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 22, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
starknet-quest ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 22, 2024 4:02pm

Copy link
Contributor

@fricoben fricoben left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Change from opus/opus.ico to opus/favicon.ico

@fricoben fricoben added the ❌ Change request Change requested from reviewer label Oct 22, 2024
@KevinLatino KevinLatino requested a review from fricoben October 22, 2024 15:58
@fricoben fricoben added 🔥 Ready for review This pull request needs a review and removed ❌ Change request Change requested from reviewer labels Oct 22, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@fricoben fricoben left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@fricoben fricoben merged commit 50188ab into lfglabs-dev:testnet Oct 23, 2024
3 of 4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🔥 Ready for review This pull request needs a review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add Opus protocol infos
2 participants