-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 146
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add Opus protocol information (#897) #898
feat: add Opus protocol information (#897) #898
Conversation
@KevinLatino is attempting to deploy a commit to the LFG Labs Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve the addition of a new entry for the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
utils/defi.ts (1)
Line range hint
50-56
: Consider updatinggetRedirectLink
for consistency.While the addition of the 'opus' entry is correct, the
getRedirectLink
function doesn't have a specific case for 'opus', unlike 'jediswap'. For consistency, you might want to consider if 'opus' needs special handling similar to 'jediswap'.If you decide to add special handling for 'opus', you could update the function like this:
export const getRedirectLink = (appName: string, actionType: string) => { if (appName.toLocaleLowerCase().includes("jediswap")) { if (actionType === "Provide Liquidity") return "https://app.jediswap.xyz/#/pools"; } + if (appName.toLocaleLowerCase() === "opus") { + return "https://app.opus.money/"; + } if (!linkMap[appName.toLowerCase()]) return ""; return linkMap[appName.toLowerCase()][actionType] || ""; };This change would ensure that 'opus' is handled consistently with other special cases.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
package-lock.json
is excluded by!**/package-lock.json
public/opus/opus.ico
is excluded by!**/*.ico
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- utils/defi.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
utils/defi.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-138
: Summary: Opus protocol successfully addedThe changes in this file successfully implement the first objective of adding the Opus protocol to the
defi.ts
file. The addition is minimal, consistent with existing patterns, and doesn't introduce any apparent issues. ThegetRedirectLink
andformatStatsData
functions remain unchanged and should work correctly with the new 'opus' entry.However, please note the following:
- Ensure the Opus URL is accessible as suggested in the verification script.
- Consider the suggestion about updating
getRedirectLink
for consistency, if deemed necessary.- Don't forget to implement the second objective mentioned in issue Add Opus protocol infos #897: creating an
/opus/
folder and adding theopus.ico
image file.
46-48
: LGTM! Opus entry added successfully.The addition of the Opus protocol entry to the
linkMap
object is correct and consistent with the existing structure. The URL provided matches the one specified in the PR objectives.To ensure the correctness of the URL, please run the following script:
This will check if the URL is accessible and returns a valid response.
✅ Verification successful
Verified! Opus entry URL is accessible.
The addition of the Opus protocol entry to the
linkMap
object has been successfully verified. The URLhttps://app.opus.money/
is accessible and returns a valid response.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the Opus URL curl -I https://app.opus.money/Length of output: 1631
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Change from opus/opus.ico
to opus/favicon.ico
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
Description
This Pull Request adds information regarding the Opus protocol, including details about its functionality and usage.
Changes Made
Related Issue
Closes #897
Images