Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix always false statement to check if values are not defined #747

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 6, 2024
Merged

fix always false statement to check if values are not defined #747

merged 5 commits into from
Aug 6, 2024

Conversation

diegoalzate
Copy link
Contributor

@diegoalzate diegoalzate commented Aug 6, 2024 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved the registration functionality by refining the condition that checks for existing fields, ensuring more accurate validation of user input.

These changes enhance the user experience by ensuring that the registration process behaves correctly even when unrelated properties are present.

@vercel Vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 6, 2024 •
edited
Loading

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
forum-frontend ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Aug 6, 2024 7:36pm

@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 6, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance the conditional logic in the Register function by refining the check for field data. The code now specifically evaluates the length of fields.data, ensuring the application accurately handles scenarios without relevant data. This improvement can positively influence user experience by affecting navigation and rendering behaviors when data is absent.

Changes

File Change Summary
packages/berlin/src/pages/Register.tsx Modified the condition to check fields.data length instead of fields.

Poem

In the meadow where data blooms bright,
A check was refined, bringing new light.
No entries? No fret, we’ll find our way,
With each little change, we dance and play.
Hop, skip, and jump, let the code now sing,
In the world of logic, joy is the thing! 🐇✨

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@diegoalzate diegoalzate self-assigned this Aug 6, 2024
@diegoalzate diegoalzate requested a review from camilovegag August 6, 2024 18:00
@diegoalzate diegoalzate added the bug Something isn't working label Aug 6, 2024
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Aug 6, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 95471f0 and cf4358b.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/berlin/src/pages/Register.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
packages/berlin/src/pages/Register.tsx (5)

Line range hint 99-99:
LGTM!

The CarouselWrapper function appears to be correctly implemented.

Line range hint 290-290:
LGTM!

The EventGroupsForm function appears to be correctly implemented.

Line range hint 349-349:
LGTM!

The SelectEventGroup function appears to be correctly implemented.

Line range hint 395-395:
LGTM!

The RegistrationForm function appears to be correctly implemented.

85-85: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.

The code changes are approved.

However, ensure that all function calls to Register are consistent with the new logic.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Aug 6, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between cf4358b and cd5e49e.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/berlin/src/pages/Register.tsx (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • packages/berlin/src/pages/Register.tsx

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Aug 6, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between cd5e49e and 8b36edd.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/berlin/src/pages/Register.tsx (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • packages/berlin/src/pages/Register.tsx

@diegoalzate diegoalzate merged commit 2282322 into main Aug 6, 2024
4 checks passed
@diegoalzate diegoalzate deleted the diego/fix-intial-step-on-register branch August 6, 2024 19:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

@camilovegag camilovegag camilovegag approved these changes

Assignees

@diegoalzate diegoalzate

Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@diegoalzate @camilovegag