Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix comments api call #718

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 2, 2024
Merged

fix comments api call #718

merged 3 commits into from
Aug 2, 2024

Conversation

diegoalzate
Copy link
Contributor

@diegoalzate diegoalzate commented Aug 2, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated the comment posting API to use optionId instead of questionOptionId for improved clarity.
  • Bug Fixes

    • No significant bug fixes were introduced, but the changes may enhance the consistency of data handling in comment requests.
  • Refactor

    • Renamed parameters and properties across relevant types and components to streamline the codebase and improve maintainability.

@diegoalzate diegoalzate added the bug Something isn't working label Aug 2, 2024
@diegoalzate diegoalzate self-assigned this Aug 2, 2024
Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 2, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
forum-frontend ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Aug 2, 2024 1:26pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 2, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes focus on renaming parameters and properties across multiple files, particularly changing questionOptionId to optionId and streamlining option-related property names. These modifications enhance clarity and consistency within the codebase related to comments and options, while maintaining overall functionality. The updates are aimed at improving readability and maintainability, ensuring the code is easier to work with moving forward.

Changes

Files Change Summary
packages/api/src/postComment.ts Renamed questionOptionId to optionId in the postComment function, affecting the request body structure without altering functionality.
packages/api/src/types/Comments.ts Updated Comment and PostCommentRequest types to replace questionOptionId with optionId, enhancing clarity without changing logic.
packages/api/src/types/Options.ts Changed optionTitle to title and optionSubTitle to subTitle in the Option type for improved consistency.
packages/api/src/types/UserOptions.ts Modified GetUserOptionsResponse type, renaming optionTitle to title and optionSubTitle to subTitle, ensuring clarity.
packages/berlin/src/pages/Comments.tsx Updated handlePostComment function to use optionId instead of questionOptionId, and adjusted property accesses for option titles.
packages/berlin/src/pages/Account.tsx Changed rendering logic to access title instead of optionTitle, reflecting the updated data structure.

Poem

🐰 In the code where comments play,
A little change brightens the day.
From questionOptionId to optionId,
Clarity hops in, oh what a ride!
With every update, we cheer and sing,
For better code is a joyful thing! 🥕✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between eee883c and a25bb77.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • packages/api/src/postComment.ts (2 hunks)
  • packages/api/src/types/Comments.ts (2 hunks)
  • packages/berlin/src/pages/Comments.tsx (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • packages/api/src/types/Comments.ts
Additional comments not posted (2)
packages/api/src/postComment.ts (1)

4-4: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.

The renaming of the parameter improves clarity and consistency.

However, ensure that all function calls to postComment match the new parameter name.

Verification successful

The function usage has been verified and is correct.

The renaming of the parameter from questionOptionId to optionId is consistently reflected in the postComment function calls.

  • Comments.tsx correctly uses optionId.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `postComment` match the new parameter name.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new parameter name.
rg --type typescript -A 5 $'postComment'

Length of output: 74


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `postComment` match the new parameter name.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new parameter name.
rg --type ts -A 5 $'postComment'

Length of output: 1526


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the `postComment` function call in `Comments.tsx` uses the correct parameter name.

# Test: Search for the `postComment` function call in `Comments.tsx`. Expect: Correct parameter name `optionId`.
rg --type ts -A 10 $'postComment' packages/berlin/src/pages/Comments.tsx

Length of output: 606

packages/berlin/src/pages/Comments.tsx (1)

92-94: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.

The renaming of the property improves clarity and consistency.

However, ensure that all function calls to handlePostComment match the new property name.

Verification successful

Verified: All function calls to handlePostComment match the new property name optionId.

The renaming of the property improves clarity and consistency, and the function usage is consistent with the new property name.

  • packages/berlin/src/pages/Comments.tsx: Verified usage of handlePostComment.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `handlePostComment` match the new property name.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new property name.
rg --type tsx -A 5 $'handlePostComment'

Length of output: 66


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `handlePostComment` match the new property name.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new property name.
rg --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' --type tsx -A 5 'handlePostComment'

Length of output: 969

@diegoalzate diegoalzate merged commit a28a307 into main Aug 2, 2024
4 checks passed
@diegoalzate diegoalzate deleted the diego/fix-comments-api-call branch August 2, 2024 13:28
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a25bb77 and f09a841.

Files selected for processing (4)
  • packages/api/src/types/Options.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/api/src/types/UserOptions.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/berlin/src/pages/Account.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/berlin/src/pages/Comments.tsx (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • packages/api/src/types/Options.ts
  • packages/api/src/types/UserOptions.ts
  • packages/berlin/src/pages/Account.tsx
Additional comments not posted (2)
packages/berlin/src/pages/Comments.tsx (2)

94-95: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.

The code changes are approved.

However, ensure that all function calls to Comments match the new property names.

Verification successful

The changes to Comments function are correctly implemented.

The properties title and subTitle are used consistently across the codebase.

  • packages/berlin/src/pages/Comments.tsx: Lines 94-95
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `Comments` match the new property names.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new property names.
rg --type js -A 5 $'Comments'

Length of output: 28


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `Comments` match the new property names.

# Test: Search for the function usage across all file types. Expect: Only occurrences of the new property names.
rg -A 5 'Comments'

Length of output: 11269


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the properties `title` and `subTitle` are used correctly in the codebase.

# Test: Search for occurrences of `title` and `subTitle` properties.
rg '\btitle\b|\bsubTitle\b'

Length of output: 8147


78-81: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.

The code changes are approved.

However, ensure that all function calls to handlePostComment match the new property name.

Verification successful

Let's refine our search to ensure that handlePostComment and the optionId property are correctly used in the codebase.


Let's perform a broader search to ensure we capture all occurrences and verify the context around optionId and handlePostComment.


LGTM! The changes are correctly implemented.

The function handlePostComment and the property optionId are used consistently within the codebase. No further action is required.

  • handlePostComment is defined and used in packages/berlin/src/pages/Comments.tsx.
  • optionId is correctly utilized across multiple files as expected.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `handlePostComment` match the new property name.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new property name.
rg --type js -A 5 $'handlePostComment'

Length of output: 37


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `handlePostComment` match the new property name.

# Search for the function definition to locate the exact context.
rg --type js -A 10 'function handlePostComment'

# Search for the function calls to ensure they match the new property name.
rg --type js 'handlePostComment'

# Verify the usage of `optionId` in the codebase.
rg --type js 'optionId'

Length of output: 106


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Perform a comprehensive search to verify the existence and usage of `handlePostComment` and `optionId`.

# Search for the function definition and calls without filtering by file type.
rg -A 10 'function handlePostComment'
rg 'handlePostComment'

# Verify the usage of `optionId` without filtering by file type.
rg 'optionId'

Length of output: 5717

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants