diego/wallet poc #457
diego/wallet poc #457
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update introduces a robust access control mechanism through the creation of an Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant AuthRouter
participant AuthHandlers
participant AccessRulesService
participant Database
Client->>AuthRouter: Request SIWE Nonce
AuthRouter->>AuthHandlers: Call getSIWENonceHandler()
AuthHandlers->>Database: Store nonce and respond
Database-->>AuthHandlers: Nonce stored
AuthHandlers-->>Client: Return nonce
Client->>AuthRouter: Submit SIWE Verification
AuthRouter->>AuthHandlers: Call verifySIWEHandler()
AuthHandlers->>AccessRulesService: Check access permissions
AccessRulesService->>Database: Query access_rules
Database-->>AccessRulesService: Access result
AccessRulesService-->>AuthHandlers: Return access result
AuthHandlers-->>Client: Respond with verification result
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (11)
- migrations/0030_sleepy_moira_mactaggert.sql (1 hunks)
- migrations/meta/0030_snapshot.json (1 hunks)
- migrations/meta/_journal.json (1 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- src/db/schema/access-rules.ts (1 hunks)
- src/db/schema/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/handlers/auth.ts (3 hunks)
- src/routers/auth.ts (1 hunks)
- src/services/access-rules.ts (1 hunks)
- src/services/auth.ts (2 hunks)
- src/types/auth.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (31)
src/types/auth.ts (2)
9-12: New Schema Addition: VerifySIWEUserSchemaThe
verifySIWEUserSchemais a well-defined schema for verifying users with a message and signature, which aligns with the Sign-In with Ethereum (SIWE) authentication method. Ensure that this schema is integrated and tested properly in the authentication flow.
3-8: Schema Renaming: Ensure Consistent Usage Across Codebase.The
verifyUserSchemahas been renamed toverifyZupassUserSchema. Ensure that all references to this schema are updated throughout the codebase to prevent any runtime errors.Verification successful
Schema Renaming Verified: No References to
verifyUserSchemaFoundThe search for
verifyUserSchemareturned no results, indicating that all references have been successfully updated toverifyZupassUserSchema. The renaming has been consistently applied across the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to `verifyUserSchema` have been updated to `verifyZupassUserSchema`. # Test: Search for the old schema name. Expect: No occurrences of the old schema name. rg --type typescript 'verifyUserSchema'Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to `verifyUserSchema` have been updated to `verifyZupassUserSchema`. # Test: Search for the old schema name. Expect: No occurrences of the old schema name. rg --type ts 'verifyUserSchema'Length of output: 31
migrations/0030_sleepy_moira_mactaggert.sql (2)
1-9: Access Rules Table: Ensure Data Consistency and IntegrityThe
access_rulestable is well-structured for managing access control with a unique constraint onproviderandsubject. Verify that the logic for populating and maintaining this table ensures data consistency and integrity.
11-11: Index Creation: Verify Performance ImpactThe index on
is_allowedis likely intended to optimize queries filtering by this column. Monitor the performance impact and ensure it aligns with the expected query patterns.src/db/schema/index.ts (1)
22-22: New Export: Access RulesThe addition of
export * from './access-rules';makes the access control definitions available for use throughout the application. Ensure that these exports are utilized correctly in the relevant parts of the application.src/routers/auth.ts (2)
5-8: Ensure handlers are implemented correctly.The handlers
getSIWENonceHandler,getSIWESessionHandler, andverifySIWEHandlerare imported but not shown here. Verify that they are implemented correctly in the../handlers/authmodule.Verification successful
Handlers are implemented correctly.
The handlers
getSIWENonceHandler,getSIWESessionHandler, andverifySIWEHandlerare implemented correctly in thesrc/handlers/auth.tsfile. They perform expected operations such as handling sessions, interacting with the database, and managing errors. No issues were found with their implementation.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of the new SIWE handlers. # Test: Search for the implementation of each handler. Expect: Correct implementation. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'function getSIWENonceHandler() { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'function getSIWESessionHandler($_) { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'function verifySIWEHandler($_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 4163
15-17: Verify new routes for SIWE.The new routes
/siwe/nonce,/siwe/verify, and/siwe/sessionare added. Ensure that these routes are correctly integrated and tested.src/db/schema/access-rules.ts (1)
3-17: Verify schema alignment with use cases.The
accessRulestable schema includes fields and indexes that appear logical. Ensure that this schema aligns with the intended use cases for access control.Verification successful
Schema aligns with intended use cases
The
accessRulesschema is used in access control logic, specifically in checking whitelist and blacklist entries based onproviderandsubject. This confirms that the schema aligns with its intended use cases.
- Usage found in
src/services/access-rules.tsfor access control logic.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `accessRules` table schema aligns with the intended use cases. # Test: Search for the usage of the `accessRules` schema in the codebase. Expect: Consistent usage with access control logic. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'accessRules'Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `accessRules` table schema aligns with the intended use cases. # Test: Search for the usage of the `accessRules` schema in the codebase. Expect: Consistent usage with access control logic. rg --type ts -A 5 $'accessRules'Length of output: 1871
package.json (1)
66-66: Acknowledgement of new dependency:siwe.The addition of the
siwelibrary (^2.3.2) is noted. This dependency supports Sign-In with Ethereum functionality, enhancing user authentication.src/services/auth.ts (2)
11-18: Access control logic added tocreateOrSignInPCD.The access control check using
checkAccessRulesenhances security by preventing unauthorized access before database operations. Ensure that the access rules are correctly defined and tested.
72-79: Access control logic increateOrSignInSIWE.The access control check using
checkAccessRulesis correctly implemented to enhance security. Ensure that the access rules for Ethereum addresses are correctly defined and tested.migrations/meta/_journal.json (1)
216-220: New migration entry added.The migration entry with index 30 is noted. Ensure that the corresponding migration script is correctly implemented and tested.
Verification successful
Migration script for index 30 verified.
The migration script
0030_sleepy_moira_mactaggertexists and contains SQL statements to create theaccess_rulestable and an index onis_allowed. Ensure that this migration is tested as part of your deployment process.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and content of the migration script for index 30. # Test: Search for the migration script. Expect: A script corresponding to index 30. fd '0030_sleepy_moira_mactaggert' --extension sql --exec catLength of output: 517
src/handlers/auth.ts (5)
73-79: LGTM! Nonce generation is correct.The nonce generation and session handling are implemented correctly.
120-151: LGTM! Session retrieval and validation are correct.The session retrieval and federated credential validation are implemented correctly.
4-9: LGTM! Imports are appropriate for new functionality.The imports for SIWE functionality are necessary and used correctly.
82-117: LGTM! VerifycreateOrSignInSIWEimplementation.The SIWE verification and session management are implemented correctly.
Ensure that the
createOrSignInSIWEfunction handles user creation or sign-in as expected.
21-21: Verify the schema change impact.The function now uses
verifyZupassUserSchema. Ensure that this schema change aligns with the expected request body structure.Verification successful
Schema change verified successfully.
The
verifyZupassUserSchemais correctly defined withpcd,uuidfields, aligning well with the expected request body structure for user verification. No issues found with the schema change.
- Definition located in
src/types/auth.ts:
pcd: stringuuid: stringScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage and definition of `verifyZupassUserSchema`. # Test: Search for the schema usage and definition. Expect: Correct schema usage in related handlers. rg --type js --type ts $'verifyZupassUserSchema'Length of output: 292
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the definition of `verifyZupassUserSchema` to examine its structure. rg --type ts --context 5 --line-number --color never 'export const verifyZupassUserSchema' src/types/auth.tsLength of output: 266
migrations/meta/0030_snapshot.json (14)
7-71: LGTM! Access rules table structure is appropriate.The table structure supports access control with unique constraints and default values.
74-149: LGTM! Comments table structure supports functionality.The table includes necessary foreign keys and timestamps for comment management.
150-227: LGTM! Cycles table structure is well-defined.The table structure supports event cycle management with appropriate indexing.
228-308: LGTM! Events table structure is flexible and extensible.The table supports event management with JSON fields for additional data.
309-380: LGTM! Federated credentials table structure is appropriate.The table supports managing federated credentials with necessary foreign keys.
381-458: LGTM! Group categories table structure is suitable.The table supports managing group categories with necessary permissions and references.
459-535: LGTM! Groups table structure supports management.The table includes necessary references and unique constraints for group management.
536-617: LGTM! Users table structure is appropriate.The table supports user management with necessary unique constraints.
619-720: LGTM! Registrations table structure supports management.The table includes necessary references and foreign keys for registration management.
721-811: LGTM! Questions table structure is suitable.The table supports question management with necessary references and extensibility through JSON fields.
812-868: LGTM! Registration field options table structure is appropriate.The table supports managing registration field options with necessary references.
869-1015: LGTM! Options table structure supports management.The table includes necessary references and foreign keys for option management.
1016-1110: LGTM! Votes table structure is suitable.The table supports vote management with necessary references and foreign keys.
1111-1214: LGTM! Registration fields table structure is appropriate.The table supports managing registration fields with necessary references and default values.
| export async function checkAccessRules( | ||
| dbPool: NodePgDatabase<typeof schema>, | ||
| data: { provider: string; subject: string }, | ||
| ) { | ||
| const whiteListEntry = await dbPool | ||
| .select() | ||
| .from(schema.accessRules) | ||
| .where( | ||
| and( | ||
| eq(schema.accessRules.provider, data.provider), | ||
| eq(schema.accessRules.subject, data.subject), | ||
| ), | ||
| ) | ||
| .limit(1); | ||
|
|
||
| if (whiteListEntry.length > 0) { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // check if there is a whitelist | ||
| const whiteListRows = await dbPool.select().from(schema.accessRules).limit(1); | ||
|
|
||
| if (whiteListRows.length > 0) { | ||
| return false; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // check if there is a black list | ||
| const blackListEntry = await dbPool | ||
| .select() | ||
| .from(schema.accessRules) | ||
| .where( | ||
| and( | ||
| eq(schema.accessRules.provider, data.provider), | ||
| eq(schema.accessRules.subject, data.subject), | ||
| ), | ||
| ) | ||
| .limit(1); | ||
|
|
||
| if (blackListEntry.length > 0) { | ||
| return false; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return true; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review and optimize access rule logic.
The checkAccessRules function implements whitelist and blacklist checks. Consider the following:
- Redundant Queries: The function performs multiple queries that could be optimized.
- Logic Clarity: Ensure that the logic for determining access is clear and handles all edge cases.
Consider refactoring to reduce database queries and improve clarity.
export async function checkAccessRules(
dbPool: NodePgDatabase<typeof schema>,
data: { provider: string; subject: string },
) {
const accessEntry = await dbPool
.select()
.from(schema.accessRules)
.where(
and(
eq(schema.accessRules.provider, data.provider),
eq(schema.accessRules.subject, data.subject),
),
)
.limit(1);
if (accessEntry.length > 0) {
return accessEntry[0].isAllowed;
}
// Check if any whitelist exists
const hasWhitelist = await dbPool
.select()
.from(schema.accessRules)
.where(eq(schema.accessRules.isAllowed, true))
.limit(1);
if (hasWhitelist.length > 0) {
return false;
}
return true;
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (4)
- migrations/0030_legal_demogoblin.sql (1 hunks)
- migrations/meta/0030_snapshot.json (1 hunks)
- migrations/meta/_journal.json (1 hunks)
- src/db/schema/access-rules.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (22)
migrations/0030_legal_demogoblin.sql (2)
11-11: Index creation is appropriate for performance.The index on
is_allowedis suitable for improving query performance when filtering by this column.
1-9: Ensure the table schema aligns with application requirements.The
access_rulestable is well-defined with appropriate data types and constraints. Ensure that theproviderandsubjectfields meet the application's requirements for length and uniqueness.Verification successful
The
providerandsubjectfields align with schema requirements.The
providerandsubjectfields are consistently defined with a length of 256 characters across the database schema and SQL migrations. Their usage in the codebase, particularly in constructing unique keys and querying, appears to respect these constraints. No discrepancies were found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `provider` and `subject` fields in the codebase to ensure alignment with the table schema. # Test: Search for occurrences of `provider` and `subject` in the codebase. Expect: Usage aligns with defined lengths and constraints. rg --type sql --type ts 'provider|subject'Length of output: 2577
src/db/schema/access-rules.ts (2)
19-19: Exported typeAccessRuleis well-defined.The export of
AccessRuleprovides a type-safe interface for accessing theaccess_rulestable.
3-17: Ensure consistency with SQL schema.The TypeScript schema for
access_rulesaligns with the SQL definition. Verify that theproviderandsubjectfields are used consistently across the application.Verification successful
Usage of
providerandsubjectfields appears consistent with schema definitions.The
providerandsubjectfields are used across various files, includingauth.ts,access-rules.ts, andfederated-credentials.ts. These usages align with their definitions in theaccess_rulesschema, maintaining consistency in terms of data types and constraints.
- Files reviewed:
src/services/auth.tssrc/services/access-rules.tssrc/db/schema/access-rules.tssrc/db/schema/federated-credentials.tsNo inconsistencies were found in the usage of these fields.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the consistency of `provider` and `subject` fields usage in the TypeScript codebase. # Test: Search for occurrences of `provider` and `subject` in the TypeScript codebase. Expect: Consistent usage with defined schema. rg --type ts 'provider|subject'Length of output: 2113
migrations/meta/_journal.json (1)
216-220: New migration entry is correctly formatted.The new entry for migration
0030_legal_demogoblinis consistent with the existing format and ensures proper tracking of migration events.migrations/meta/0030_snapshot.json (17)
7-72: EnsurenotNullconstraints align with business logic.The
providerandsubjectcolumns are nullable. Consider whether these fields should be mandatory for access control logic.Could you verify if nullable values for
providerandsubjectare intended, or if they should be marked asnotNull: trueto prevent potential data integrity issues?
30-35: Review default value foris_allowed.The
is_allowedcolumn defaults tofalse. Ensure this aligns with the intended logic for access control.Is the default value of
falseforis_allowedconsistent with the expected behavior for new entries in theaccess_rulestable?
74-145: Ensure foreign key constraints reflect business relationships.The
user_idandoption_idcolumns have foreign key constraints. Verify that these relationships are correctly defined and necessary.Can you confirm that the foreign key constraints on
user_idandoption_idare correct and reflect the intended relationships?
150-223: Review default status value.The
statuscolumn defaults to'UPCOMING'. Ensure this default aligns with the lifecycle of a cycle.Is the default value
'UPCOMING'for thestatuscolumn appropriate for all new cycles, or should it be set explicitly based on business logic?
228-307: Consider constraints on event fields.The
nameandfieldscolumns are marked asnotNull. Ensure these constraints align with business requirements.Are the
notNullconstraints onnameandfieldsconsistent with the expected data model for events?
309-379: Ensure uniqueness of federated credentials.The unique constraint on
providerandsubjectensures no duplicate federated credentials. Verify this aligns with the authentication logic.Is the unique constraint on
providerandsubjectsufficient to prevent duplicate federated credentials for a user?
381-458: Review boolean defaults for group categories.The
user_can_create,user_can_view, andrequiredcolumns default tofalse. Ensure these defaults align with the intended permissions model.Are the default values for
user_can_create,user_can_view, andrequiredconsistent with the permissions model for group categories?
459-534: Ensure security of group secrets.The
secretcolumn is nullable. Consider whether this field should be mandatory for security purposes.Should the
secretcolumn be marked asnotNullto ensure all groups have a security measure in place?
536-617: Ensure uniqueness constraints meet user requirements.The unique constraints on
username,telegramensure no duplicates. Verify these constraints align with user management logic.Are the unique constraints on
username,telegramappropriate for the user management system?
619-720: Review registration status default.The
statuscolumn defaults to'DRAFT'. Ensure this default aligns with the registration process.Is the default value
'DRAFT'for thestatuscolumn appropriate for all new registrations, or should it be set explicitly based on business logic?
721-807: Ensure vote model default aligns with voting logic.The
vote_modelcolumn defaults to'COCM'. Verify this default aligns with the voting logic.Is the default value
'COCM'for thevote_modelcolumn appropriate for all questions, or should it be set explicitly based on business logic?
812-868: Ensure value constraints align with registration field logic.The
valuecolumn is marked asnotNull. Verify this constraint aligns with the logic for registration field options.Is the
notNullconstraint on thevaluecolumn appropriate for all registration field options, or should it be optional in some cases?
869-1015: Review default values for options.The
showandvote_scorecolumns have default values. Ensure these defaults align with the options logic.Are the default values for
showandvote_scoreconsistent with the intended behavior for options?
1016-1110: Ensure vote count constraints align with voting logic.The
num_of_votescolumn is marked asnotNull. Verify this constraint aligns with the logic for vote counting.Is the
notNullconstraint on thenum_of_votescolumn appropriate for all votes, or should it be optional in some cases?
1111-1214: Review default values for registration fields.The
type,required,character_limit,for_group, andfor_usercolumns have default values. Ensure these defaults align with the registration logic.Are the default values for
type,required,character_limit,for_group, andfor_userconsistent with the intended behavior for registration fields?
1215-1290: Ensure value constraints align with registration data logic.The
valuecolumn is marked asnotNull. Verify this constraint aligns with the logic for registration data.Is the
notNullconstraint on thevaluecolumn appropriate for all registration data entries, or should it be optional in some cases?
1291-1379: Ensure foreign key constraints reflect user-group relationships.The
user_id,group_id, andgroup_category_idcolumns have foreign key constraints. Verify that these relationships are correctly defined and necessary.Can you confirm that the foreign key constraints on
user_id,group_id, andgroup_category_idare correct and reflect the intended relationships?
inspired by https://docs.login.xyz/sign-in-with-ethereum/quickstart-guide/implement-the-backend
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores