Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RA: Count failed authorizations using key-value rate limits #7346

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 11, 2024

Conversation

beautifulentropy
Copy link
Member

@beautifulentropy beautifulentropy commented Feb 29, 2024

Part of #5545

cmd/boulder-ra/main.go Show resolved Hide resolved
cmd/boulder-ra/main.go Show resolved Hide resolved
cmd/boulder-wfe2/main.go Show resolved Hide resolved
ratelimits/bucket.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pgporada
pgporada previously approved these changes Mar 1, 2024
ra/ra.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
beautifulentropy added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2024
…7344)

- Update the failed authorizations limit to use 'enum:regId:domain' for
transactions while maintaining 'enum:regId' for overrides.
- Modify the failed authorizations transaction builder to generate a
transaction for each order name.
- Rename the `FailedAuthorizationsPerAccount` enum to
`FailedAuthorizationsPerDomainPerAccount` to align with its corrected
implementation. This change is possible because the limit isn't yet
deployed in staging or production.

Blocks #7346
Part of #5545
@beautifulentropy beautifulentropy force-pushed the ratelimits-ra-failed-validations branch from 40cd858 to a0dc3a7 Compare March 6, 2024 19:03
@beautifulentropy beautifulentropy requested a review from a team March 11, 2024 16:18
@beautifulentropy beautifulentropy merged commit 7e5c1ca into main Mar 11, 2024
19 checks passed
@beautifulentropy beautifulentropy deleted the ratelimits-ra-failed-validations branch March 11, 2024 21:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants