Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: upgrade to cosmos v50 #1833

Open
wants to merge 44 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

feat: upgrade to cosmos v50 #1833

wants to merge 44 commits into from

Conversation

Yaroms
Copy link
Collaborator

@Yaroms Yaroms commented Dec 12, 2024

Description

Closes: #XXXX


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • read the contribution guide
  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the main branch
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

@Yaroms Yaroms marked this pull request as ready for review December 12, 2024 22:45
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 15, 2024

Test Results

2 224 tests   - 164   2 183 ✅  - 205   11m 34s ⏱️ - 14m 19s
  119 suites  -   3       0 💤 ±  0 
    6 files    -   1      41 ❌ + 41 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 67c7f0b. ± Comparison against base commit ab41450.

This pull request removes 179 and adds 15 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.
github.com/lavanet/lava/v4/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheExpirationMultiplier
github.com/lavanet/lava/v4/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheExpirationMultiplier/Multiplier_of_1
github.com/lavanet/lava/v4/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheExpirationMultiplier/Multiplier_of_1.2
github.com/lavanet/lava/v4/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheExpirationMultiplier/Multiplier_of_2
github.com/lavanet/lava/v4/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheExpirationMultiplier/Multiplier_of_2.5
github.com/lavanet/lava/v4/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheExpirationMultiplier/Multiplier_of_200
github.com/lavanet/lava/v4/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheFailSetWithInvalidRequestBlock
github.com/lavanet/lava/v4/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheFailSetWithInvalidRequestBlock/Finalized_After_delay_No_Hash
github.com/lavanet/lava/v4/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheFailSetWithInvalidRequestBlock/Finalized_After_delay_No_Hash#01
github.com/lavanet/lava/v4/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheFailSetWithInvalidRequestBlock/Finalized_After_delay_With_Hash
…
github.com/lavanet/lava/v4/utils/lavaslices ‑ TestSortStable
github.com/lavanet/lava/v4/utils/lavaslices ‑ TestSortStable/already_sorted
github.com/lavanet/lava/v4/utils/lavaslices ‑ TestSortStable/duplicates
github.com/lavanet/lava/v4/utils/lavaslices ‑ TestSortStable/empty_slice
github.com/lavanet/lava/v4/utils/lavaslices ‑ TestSortStable/negative_numbers
github.com/lavanet/lava/v4/utils/lavaslices ‑ TestSortStable/reverse_order
github.com/lavanet/lava/v4/x/spec/types ‑ TestSortSpecsByHierarchy
github.com/lavanet/lava/v4/x/spec/types ‑ TestSortSpecsByHierarchy/circular_dependency
github.com/lavanet/lava/v4/x/spec/types ‑ TestSortSpecsByHierarchy/complex_circular_dependency
github.com/lavanet/lava/v4/x/spec/types ‑ TestSortSpecsByHierarchy/complex_dependencies
…

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment