Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: integration providers index update #28808

Merged

Conversation

leo-gan
Copy link
Collaborator

@leo-gan leo-gan commented Dec 19, 2024

Issue: integrations related to a provider can be spread across several packages and classes. It is very hard to find a provider using only ToCs.
Fix: we have a very useful and helpful tool to search by provider name. It is the Search field. So, I've added recommendations for using this field. It seems obvious but it is not.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 19, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
langchain ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 19, 2024 2:28am

@dosubot dosubot bot added size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. 🤖:docs Changes to documentation and examples, like .md, .rst, .ipynb files. Changes to the docs/ folder labels Dec 19, 2024
@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm PR looks good. Use to confirm that a PR is ready for merging. label Dec 19, 2024
@ccurme ccurme enabled auto-merge (squash) December 19, 2024 02:19
@ccurme ccurme merged commit c823cc5 into langchain-ai:master Dec 19, 2024
13 checks passed
@leo-gan leo-gan deleted the docs-integration-providers-index-update branch December 19, 2024 04:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🤖:docs Changes to documentation and examples, like .md, .rst, .ipynb files. Changes to the docs/ folder lgtm PR looks good. Use to confirm that a PR is ready for merging. size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants