fix: fedora workloads definition in function tests #623
Conversation
This change resolves an issue where manually starting the Fedora end-to-end tests was not possible due to invalid workload values. It is important to note that the Fedora templates have changed the sizes, while the workloads remain the same, only including small, medium, and large. Signed-off-by: Nestor Acuna Blanco <[email protected]>
kubevirt-bot
added
release-note-none
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
needs-ok-to-test
|
Hi @nestoracunablanco. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubevirt member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/cc @ksimon1 Please, take a look. |
|
/ok-to-test |
openshift-ci
bot
added
ok-to-test
|
/retest |
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ksimon1 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
kubevirt-bot
added
the
approved
This change resolves an issue where manually starting the Fedora end-to-end tests was not possible due to invalid workload values. It is important to note that the Fedora templates have changed the sizes, while the workloads remain the same, only including small, medium, and large.
What this PR does / why we need it: s390x enablement
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Release note: