-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Azure: add force delete option #6432
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
You'll want to cut a new chart version (Chart.yaml) w/ these changes. I'd say that this warrants a minor bump. |
/assign @gandhipr |
Can we add some testing details performed? |
Sure, also forgot to mention this is still WIP |
3af1015
to
7212628
Compare
@gandhipr @jackfrancis Fixed unit tests, ready for final review pass before I squash. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Everything else looks good to me. Just had comment related to initializing the toggle.
@@ -166,6 +166,8 @@ spec: | |||
secretKeyRef: | |||
key: VMType | |||
name: {{ default (include "cluster-autoscaler.fullname" .) .Values.secretKeyRefNameOverride }} | |||
- name: AZURE_ENABLE_FORCE_DELETE | |||
value: "{{ .Values.azureEnableForceDelete }}" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we just have it in the same way as enableDynamicInstanceList ? Do we have some added advantage here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe we want to be putting all the env vars in the Helm chart based on what @jackfrancis said a while back.
/lgtm |
7b26fc3
to
e8ad029
Compare
@Jont828 you'll need to bump the chart version (which will mean whichever of your PRs merges first will conflict with the other one that also needs a chart version bump, fyi) |
/test pull-cluster-autoscaler-e2e-azure |
/test ? |
@jackfrancis: The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:
Use In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
e8ad029
to
8891d48
Compare
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Jont828 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/test pull-cluster-autoscaler-e2e-azure |
8891d48
to
c5c4611
Compare
@jackfrancis @gandhipr Are we good to merge this? |
Seems like something got lost here? I only see a fraction of the original changes. |
@jackfrancis We forgot to remove the commit containing force delete in #6447 so force delete actually got merged already. This is just a follow up to address comments and for consistency. |
/remove-area helm-charts |
PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it: Add force delete option in Azure to the Helm chart and Azure autoscaler.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: