Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make stylePast compatible with event mode, add xmlString option and fix indentation #17

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Harold-Seefeld
Copy link

Option stylePast has been made compatible with the "event" calendar mode.
image

The indentation of the calendar.js code was fixed as indentation was inconsistent initially with brackets and if statements.

The xmlString option enables a string to be used at runtime to display XML on the calendar; effectively enabling user-tailored calendars to be generated without generating a new file/url on the server.

Note: the xmlUrl option is given priority over the xmlString option; if xmlUrl exists, xmlString will not do anything.

Name: xmlString
Description: String input for XML events
Options: 'same content formatting as xmlUrl'
Default: undefined

@kthornbloom

@Harold-Seefeld Harold-Seefeld changed the title Make stylePast compatible with event mode Make stylePast compatible with event mode and add xmlString option Apr 13, 2016
@Harold-Seefeld Harold-Seefeld changed the title Make stylePast compatible with event mode and add xmlString option Make stylePast compatible with event mode and add xmlString option and fix indentation Apr 13, 2016
@Harold-Seefeld Harold-Seefeld changed the title Make stylePast compatible with event mode and add xmlString option and fix indentation Make stylePast compatible with event mode, add xmlString option and fix indentation Apr 13, 2016
@Harold-Seefeld
Copy link
Author

Conflict occurred in merge #13

@kthornbloom
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for this, will review soon

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants