Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(STONEINTG-524): update NS of pipelines-as-code secret #304

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 11, 2023

Conversation

hongweiliu17
Copy link
Contributor

@hongweiliu17 hongweiliu17 commented Sep 11, 2023

  • update NS of pipelines-as-code secret since the NS has been changed to openshift-pipelines

Maintainers will complete the following section

  • Commit messages are descriptive enough (hints)
  • Code coverage from testing does not decrease and new code is covered
  • Controllers diagrams are updated when PR changes controllers code (if applicable)

* update NS of pipelines-as-code secret since the NS has been
  changed to openshift-pipelines

Signed-off-by: Hongwei Liu <[email protected]>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 11, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: +1.23% 🎉

Comparison is base (d1595e8) 67.98% compared to head (cafa2a2) 69.21%.
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #304      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   67.98%   69.21%   +1.23%     
==========================================
  Files          38       38              
  Lines        3658     3658              
==========================================
+ Hits         2487     2532      +45     
+ Misses        914      874      -40     
+ Partials      257      252       -5     
Files Changed Coverage Δ
status/reporters.go 62.37% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@dheerajodha dheerajodha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants