This crate provides the program add-determinism
that takes one or more paths as arguments,
and will recursively process those paths,
attempting to run the handlers on any files with extensions that match.
(Each argument can be either a single file or a directory to be processed recursively.)
For each processed file, a temporary file is opened, the contents are rewritten, the modification timestamp is copied from the original file to the temporary copy, and the copy is renamed over the original.
If processing fails, a warning is emitted, but no modifications are made and the program returns success.
The purpose of this tool is to elimiate common source of non-determinism in builds, making it easier to create reproducible (package) builds.
$ add-determinism /path/to/file /path/to/directory
Note that the program works in-place, replacing input files with the rewritten versions (if any modifications are made).
Some useful options:
-v
— enable debug output-j [N]
— useN
workers (or as many as CPUs, ifN
is not given)--handler list|HANDLER|-HANDLER
— constrain the list of handlers. Takes a comma-separated list of names, either a list of "positive" names, in which case only listed handlers will be used, or a list of "negative" names, each prefixed by minus, in which case the listed handlers will not be used. By default, handlers that cannot be initialized are skipped with a warning. If a "positive" list is given, failure to initialize a handler will cause an error. The special valuelist
can be used to list known handlers.--brp
— enable "build root program" mode, see below.
When invoked with --brp
, the $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
environment variable must be defined and not empty.
All arguments must be below $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
.
This option is intended to be used in rpm macros that define post-install steps.
See redhat-rpm-config pull request #293
for a pull request that added a call to add-determinism
in %__os_install_post
.
When invoked with --check
, the tool processes all files,
but does not actually save any modifications.
Instead, it'll fail if any files would have been modified.
It also returns an error if any files cannot be read.
Accepts *.a
.
Resets the embedded modification times to $SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH
and owner:group to 0:0.
Accepts *.jar
.
This rewrites the zip file using the zip
crate.
The modification times of archive entries is clamped $SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH
.
Extra metadata, i.e. primarily timestamps in UNIX format and DOS permissions,
is stripped (also because the crate does not support them).
Accepts *.html
.
This looks at the <head>
portion of an HTML file and finds standard
lines inserted by Javadoc that specify the file creation date.
For example,
<!-- Generated by javadoc (<version>) on <date> -->
is replaced by a version without the version and date,
and <meta name="dc.created" content="<date>">
is replaced by a version with $SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH
.
Accepts *.pyc
.
This handler implements a .pyc
file parser for Python bytecode files
and cleans up unused "flag references".
It is a Rust reimplementation of
the MarshalParser Python module.
Accepts *.pyc
.
This handler sets the internal timestamp in .pyc
file header to 0,
and sets the mtime on the corresponding source .py
file to 0.
This is intended to be used on OSTree
systems where mtimes are discarded,
causing a mismatch between the timestamp embedded in the .pyc
file
and the filesystem metadata of the .py
file.
This handler is not enabled by default and must be explicitly requested
via --handler pyc-zero-mtime
.
Accepts *.zip
.
This rewrites the zip file using the zip
crate.
The modification times of archive entries is clamped $SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH
.
Extra metadata, i.e. primarily timestamps in UNIX format and DOS permissions,
is stripped (also because the crate does not support them).
This project is inspired by strip-nondeterminism, but is written from scratch in Rust. For Debian, build tools are written in Perl and more Perl is not an issue. But in Fedora/RHEL/…, tools are written in Bash, Python, or compiled, and we don't want to pull in Perl into all buildroots. In addition, the details differ in what kinds of processing we want to do. For example, Debian does not distribute Python bytecode files.