Removes cookiecutter, updates developer docs #636
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…e extension-template in dev docs
|
I think this is a good idea. If we ever need to to look at this it is in the Git history. This will simplify the experience and cause less confusion for users. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Removes the cookiecutter package from the codebase, mentions using the extension-template in developer docs to create an extension instead. Fixes #613. Building a custom slash command does not require the use of the cookiecutter, and when an unaffiliated developer used it, the cookiecutter did not help to produce an extension for Jupyter AI.