Add TOML DataFormat Support

[mlasevich]

This pull requests adds the TOML dataformat library to existing formats (XML, YAML, etc)

Testing done

• Minimal change, just adds a library
• Basic Unit test added to ensure it works
• Manually tested on local instance

Submitter checklist

Beta Give feedback

1. Make sure you are opening from a topic/feature/bugfix branch (right side) and not your main branch!
2. Ensure that the pull request title represents the desired changelog entry
3. Please describe what you did
4. (N/A) Link to relevant issues in GitHub or Jira
5. (N/A) Link to relevant pull requests, esp. upstream and downstream changes
6. Ensure you have provided tests - that demonstrates feature works or fixes the issue

[jtnord]

This pull requests adds the TOML dataformat library to existing formats (XML, YAML, etc)

What plugin needs this (please link to a downstream PR), or is this just because it is part of the bom?

[mlasevich]

No other PR (yet?).

We would consume this from a Pipeline Library to read TOML files(right now pyproject.toml) . I was initially going to open a PR for utility steps plugin, so that it would have a readTOML next to readJSON and readYAML - but after I looked at it, I realized they are not using Jackson at all, and I decided against trying to add it as a dependency to such a high profile plugin.

Instead I am guessing I would need to create a new one for reatTOML/writeTOML, when I have some time. Meanwhile, just using it from a global pipeline library would be great..

[jtnord]

No other PR (yet?).

We would consume this from a Pipeline Library to read TOML files(right now pyproject.toml) . I was initially going to open a PR for utility steps plugin, so that it would have a readTOML next to readJSON and readYAML - but after I looked at it, I realized they are not using Jackson at all, and I decided against trying to add it as a dependency to such a high profile plugin.

Instead I am guessing I would need to create a new one for reatTOML/writeTOML, when I have some time. Meanwhile, just using it from a global pipeline library would be great..

I'm not against adding this here as it is part of the jackson bom, but without a PR or a new plugin to consume it, it has the possibility to just add to the size of the plugin and never be used.