Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add arbitrary shape support for ViT series #46

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 22, 2024

Conversation

james77777778
Copy link
Owner

@james77777778 james77777778 commented May 22, 2024

Related to #45

  1. Add arbitrary shape support for ViT and MobileViT
  2. Simplify the logic in BaseModel
  3. Add more model weights

1. Add arbitrary shape support to ViT and MobileViT
2. Simplify the logic in BaseModel
3. Add more model weights
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.77%. Comparing base (2160b3e) to head (89c61f8).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #46      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.39%   94.77%   +0.37%     
==========================================
  Files          39       39              
  Lines        4263     4266       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         4024     4043      +19     
+ Misses        239      223      -16     
Flag Coverage Δ
kimm 94.77% <100.00%> (+0.37%) ⬆️
kimm-jax 94.11% <100.00%> (+0.37%) ⬆️
kimm-numpy 66.36% <81.14%> (+5.98%) ⬆️
kimm-tensorflow 94.44% <100.00%> (+0.37%) ⬆️
kimm-torch 94.11% <100.00%> (+0.37%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@james77777778 james77777778 merged commit e2d31cc into main May 22, 2024
7 checks passed
@james77777778 james77777778 deleted the support-arbitrary-size branch May 22, 2024 03:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant