Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(SP: 2) Enhance chat search #2610

Open
ipasic-softserve opened this issue Oct 12, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #2628
Open

(SP: 2) Enhance chat search #2610

ipasic-softserve opened this issue Oct 12, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #2628
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Frontend part

Comments

@ipasic-softserve
Copy link
Contributor

The current chat search functionality only works with the messages that are currently loaded, not across all messages:

image
image

This needs to be updated so that the search covers all messages, both loaded and unloaded.

Example: If a user searches for the term "test" and there is one match in the 10 currently loaded messages, but another match exists 40 messages back, the system should load all 40 messages and display the relevant matches.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Project Backlog in SpaceToStudy Oct 12, 2024
@ipasic-softserve ipasic-softserve changed the title (SP: ) Fix chat search (SP: 3) Fix chat search Oct 14, 2024
@ipasic-softserve ipasic-softserve changed the title (SP: 3) Fix chat search (SP: 2) Enhance chat search Oct 14, 2024
@Mav-Ivan Mav-Ivan self-assigned this Oct 14, 2024
@Mav-Ivan Mav-Ivan moved this from Project Backlog to In progress in SpaceToStudy Oct 16, 2024
@Mav-Ivan Mav-Ivan linked a pull request Oct 17, 2024 that will close this issue
@Mav-Ivan Mav-Ivan moved this from In progress to Merge request in SpaceToStudy Oct 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Frontend part
Projects
Status: Merge request
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants