-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add simulation test #422
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update enhances the simulation project's testing framework by introducing a new GitHub Actions workflow and various simulation-related functionalities. Key changes include automated tests for application determinism, new simulation functions, and improved dependency management. The modifications aim to ensure consistent behavior and reliability across the application, enriching the overall development and testing experience. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Developer
participant GitHubActions
participant SimulationTests
participant App
Developer->>GitHubActions: Create Pull Request
GitHubActions->>SimulationTests: Trigger Tests
SimulationTests->>App: Run Tests for Determinism
App->>SimulationTests: Return Test Results
SimulationTests->>GitHubActions: Report Results
GitHubActions->>Developer: Notify Completion
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (11)
- .github/workflows/sims.yaml (1 hunks)
- Makefile (1 hunks)
- e2e/go.mod (2 hunks)
- e2e/sim_test.go (1 hunks)
- e2e/suite.go (1 hunks)
- modules/coinswap/simulation/genesis.go (1 hunks)
- modules/coinswap/simulation/operations.go (2 hunks)
- modules/farm/keeper/keeper_test.go (1 hunks)
- modules/farm/simulation/operations.go (7 hunks)
- scripts/build/build.mk (1 hunks)
- scripts/build/simulations.mk (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- Makefile
Additional comments not posted (28)
scripts/build/build.mk (2)
2-2
: LGTM!The addition of
BINDIR
dynamically references the Go binaries, which is a standard practice.
3-3
: LGTM!The addition of
CURRENT_DIR
captures the current working directory, which is useful for scripts that need to operate relative to the directory from which they are executed.scripts/build/simulations.mk (4)
1-4
: LGTM!The
test-sim-nondeterminism
target is well-defined and uses appropriate parameters for the non-determinism test.
6-9
: LGTM!The
test-sim-nondeterminism-fast
target is well-defined and uses appropriate parameters for a quick non-determinism test.
11-14
: LGTM!The
test-sim-import-export
target is well-defined and uses appropriate parameters for the import/export simulation test.
16-19
: LGTM!The
test-sim-after-import
target is well-defined and uses appropriate parameters for the simulation-after-import test..github/workflows/sims.yaml (3)
5-15
: LGTM!The
test-sim-nondeterminism-fast
job is well-defined and uses appropriate steps for setting up the environment and running the test.
16-26
: Verify if the job needs to be enabled.The
test-sim-import-export
job is commented out. Verify if it needs to be enabled or if it is a work-in-progress.
27-37
: Verify if the job needs to be enabled.The
test-sim-after-import
job is commented out. Verify if it needs to be enabled or if it is a work-in-progress.e2e/suite.go (2)
Line range hint
54-58
:
LGTM!The
defaultDepinjectOptions
function centralizes the creation of dependency injection options, improving code clarity and maintainability.
51-52
: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
DepinjectOptions
are tested to verify the new behavior.Verification successful
Function usage verified and new behavior is being tested.
The new function
defaultDepinjectOptions
is being used in multiple test files, ensuring that the new behavior is covered by tests.
simapp/test_helpers.go
simapp/network.go
e2e/suite.go
e2e/sim_test.go
modules/*/keeper_test.go
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `DepinjectOptions` to ensure the new behavior is tested. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Occurrences of `DepinjectOptions`. rg --type go -A 5 $'DepinjectOptions'Length of output: 10463
modules/coinswap/simulation/genesis.go (1)
23-74
: LGTM! But verify the generated parameters.The
RandomizedGenState
function implementation is correct and aligns with the expected behavior.However, ensure that the generated parameters are within the expected bounds and the error handling is robust.
e2e/go.mod (1)
9-9
: LGTM! But verify the usage of the new dependency.The changes in the dependency management are approved.
However, ensure that the new dependency is correctly utilized in the codebase.
Verification successful
The new dependency
github.com/cometbft/cometbft-db v0.7.0
is correctly utilized in the codebase.The dependency is imported and used in the following files:
simapp/test_helpers.go
simapp/app_v2.go
e2e/sim_test.go
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new dependency `github.com/cometbft/cometbft-db v0.7.0`. # Test: Search for the dependency usage. Expect: Occurrences of `cometbft-db`. rg --type go -A 5 $'cometbft-db'Length of output: 1130
modules/farm/keeper/keeper_test.go (1)
444-445
: Ensure proper error handling forkeeper.RewardInvariant
.The function now includes a call to
keeper.RewardInvariant(suite.keeper)(ctx)
and asserts thatbroken
isFalse
. Ensure thaterr
is appropriately handled.Verification successful
Ensure proper handling of the
RewardInvariant
function's return values.The
RewardInvariant
function returns a string and a boolean, not an error. Ensure that the test correctly handles the string description and the boolean result.
modules/farm/keeper/keeper_test.go
lines 444-445Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the error handling for `keeper.RewardInvariant`. # Test: Search for the `RewardInvariant` function to understand its error handling. rg --type go 'func RewardInvariant' -A 10Length of output: 901
e2e/sim_test.go (5)
88-146
: LGTM! Verify simulation setup and parameters.The setup and simulation process looks correct. Ensure that the simulation parameters are appropriate for your use case.
148-339
: LGTM! Verify import/export functionality and store comparison.The import/export process and store comparison look correct. Ensure that the comparison logic is appropriate for your use case.
341-453
: LGTM! Verify simulation setup and parameters after import.The setup and simulation process after import looks correct. Ensure that the simulation parameters are appropriate for your use case.
457-534
: LGTM! Verify determinism test setup and parameters.The setup and determinism test process looks correct. Ensure that the test parameters are appropriate for your use case.
58-68
: LGTM! Verify initialization process.The initialization process looks correct. Ensure that the flags and default node home directory are appropriate for your use case.
modules/farm/simulation/operations.go (7)
Line range hint
107-239
: LGTM! Verify pool creation simulation logic.The pool creation simulation logic looks correct. Ensure that the logic covers all necessary scenarios and edge cases.
Line range hint
240-391
: LGTM! Verify pool adjustment simulation logic.The pool adjustment simulation logic looks correct. Ensure that the logic covers all necessary scenarios and edge cases.
Line range hint
392-498
: LGTM! Verify staking simulation logic.The staking simulation logic looks correct. Ensure that the logic covers all necessary scenarios and edge cases.
Line range hint
499-603
: LGTM! Verify unstaking simulation logic.The unstaking simulation logic looks correct. Ensure that the logic covers all necessary scenarios and edge cases.
Line range hint
604-682
: LGTM! Verify harvesting simulation logic.The harvesting simulation logic looks correct. Ensure that the logic covers all necessary scenarios and edge cases.
Line range hint
683-742
: LGTM! Verify pool destruction simulation logic.The pool destruction simulation logic looks correct. Ensure that the logic covers all necessary scenarios and edge cases.
Line range hint
743-847
: LGTM! Verify helper functions.The helper functions for generating random values look correct. Ensure that they cover all necessary scenarios and edge cases.
modules/coinswap/simulation/operations.go (2)
944-946
: Impact of reducing the random token amount.The change from
token.Amount.QuoRaw(2)
totoken.Amount.QuoRaw(4)
reduces the maximum random amount that can be generated, which could affect the token distribution logic.Ensure that this change aligns with the intended behavior of the simulation and does not negatively impact other parts of the system.
1005-1015
: Improved error handling for negativesoldTokenAmt
.The new conditional check for negative
soldTokenAmt
enhances error handling by ensuring that the function can gracefully manage situations where the computed amount does not meet the expected constraints. This improves the robustness of the token swapping logic.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores