feat: add t0124 with ipns fixtures #37

laurentsenta · 2023-04-10T13:32:41Z

contributes to #10
requires ipfs/kubo#9667 (allow-offline for ipns fixtures)

🎶 the regular test is failing; this is expected: we need the ipfs routing put --allow-offline option that is not released yet. The second workflow "Test Master" is passing.

Failing test to make sure tests are running - we removed the ipns-record on purpose.

implement ipns-record fixture loader & exporter
implement ipns checker for response
t0116-gateway-cache.sh
t0124-gateway-ipns-record.sh
fix fixture collision names
add a test runner on kubo's master

Todo

kubo: make it possible to import records even in offline mode
kubo: make it possible to call the api in offline mode
- If we try to get the record with http://127.0.0.1:8080/ipns/k51qzi5uqu5dhjjqhpcuvdnskq4mz84a2xg1rpqzi6s5460q2612egkfjsk42x?format=ipns-record
  the call timeouts because kubo take its time to load the record from the network.
- If we try to start the daemon in offline mode we get "this action must be run in online mode, try running 'ipfs daemon' first".
Discuss code reuse with the team, we have to copy and paste a lot of code (see kubo_name)
validate the API:
- how we distribute ipns-records
- how we export as fixture & use them in tests

Follow-up

t0114-gateway-subdomains.sh
t0123-gateway-json-cbor.sh

laurentsenta · 2023-04-10T13:34:24Z

(temporary target on t0109 because this builts on top of dnslink)

laurentsenta · 2023-04-12T14:04:52Z

(note the test will not pass until ipfs/kubo#9667 is released)

cmd/gateway-conformance/main.go

tooling/ipns/kubo_name.go

BigLep · 2023-05-01T04:55:19Z

@laurentsenta : please request review from @hacdias when this is out of draft.

BigLep · 2023-05-05T19:50:59Z

@laurentsenta : I saw the comment here about waiting on review. Who are you waiting on review from? This may not be clear given that this is in draft.

tests/t0124_gateway_ipns_record_test.go

tooling/ipns/ipns.go

hacdias

Very nice overall. I also wanted to ask if there is any reason why we're keeping the bash code from the old sharness tests as comments. I would personally like to get them cleanup up, but I just want to understand the reasoning. Is it to make it clear which tests are which during the transitioning period from sharness to the gateway conformance suite?

Also, CI ain't happy. Maybe I just reviewed before time, but I saw @BigLep's comment so I just went for it 😃

laurentsenta · 2023-05-09T15:02:28Z

Thanks for the review @hacdias & for the note @BigLep,

We had a sync this morning with @galargh and @hacdias we reviewed and agreed on the API.
With #34 merged I will move this one out of draft state next.

hacdias · 2023-05-10T11:58:30Z

@laurentsenta this is how I would update to use the new boxo/ipns.ValidateWithPeerID. Sadly, I can't commit here, so here it is:

diff --git a/go.mod b/go.mod
index 1d7b8f0..47500e3 100644
--- a/go.mod
+++ b/go.mod
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ module github.com/ipfs/gateway-conformance
 go 1.20
 
 require (
-	github.com/ipfs/boxo v0.8.1
+	github.com/ipfs/boxo v0.8.2-0.20230510114019-33e3f0cd052b
 	github.com/ipfs/go-cid v0.4.1
 	github.com/ipld/go-ipld-prime v0.20.0
 	github.com/libp2p/go-libp2p v0.26.3
diff --git a/go.sum b/go.sum
index bfa7c29..cf7a061 100644
--- a/go.sum
+++ b/go.sum
@@ -47,8 +47,8 @@ github.com/hashicorp/golang-lru v0.5.4/go.mod h1:iADmTwqILo4mZ8BN3D2Q6+9jd8WM5uG
 github.com/huin/goupnp v1.0.3 h1:N8No57ls+MnjlB+JPiCVSOyy/ot7MJTqlo7rn+NYSqQ=
 github.com/ipfs/bbloom v0.0.4 h1:Gi+8EGJ2y5qiD5FbsbpX/TMNcJw8gSqr7eyjHa4Fhvs=
 github.com/ipfs/bbloom v0.0.4/go.mod h1:cS9YprKXpoZ9lT0n/Mw/a6/aFV6DTjTLYHeA+gyqMG0=
-github.com/ipfs/boxo v0.8.1 h1:3DkKBCK+3rdEB5t77WDShUXXhktYwH99mkAsgajsKrU=
-github.com/ipfs/boxo v0.8.1/go.mod h1:xJ2hVb4La5WyD7GvKYE0lq2g1rmQZoCD2K4WNrV6aZI=
+github.com/ipfs/boxo v0.8.2-0.20230510114019-33e3f0cd052b h1:6EVpfwbBgwhfZOA19i55jOGokKOy+OaQAm1dg4RbXmc=
+github.com/ipfs/boxo v0.8.2-0.20230510114019-33e3f0cd052b/go.mod h1:Ej2r08Z4VIaFKqY08UXMNhwcLf6VekHhK8c+KqA1B9Y=
 github.com/ipfs/go-bitfield v1.1.0 h1:fh7FIo8bSwaJEh6DdTWbCeZ1eqOaOkKFI74SCnsWbGA=
 github.com/ipfs/go-bitfield v1.1.0/go.mod h1:paqf1wjq/D2BBmzfTVFlJQ9IlFOZpg422HL0HqsGWHU=
 github.com/ipfs/go-block-format v0.0.2/go.mod h1:AWR46JfpcObNfg3ok2JHDUfdiHRgWhJgCQF+KIgOPJY=
diff --git a/tooling/ipns/ipns_test.go b/tooling/ipns/ipns_test.go
index 4cced6f..b2c9dbb 100644
--- a/tooling/ipns/ipns_test.go
+++ b/tooling/ipns/ipns_test.go
@@ -42,9 +42,8 @@ func TestLoadIPNSRecord(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.Equal(t, ipns.Value(), "/ipfs/bafkreidfdrlkeq4m4xnxuyx6iae76fdm4wgl5d4xzsb77ixhyqwumhz244")
 	assert.True(t, ipns.Entry.Validity.After(YEAR_100))
 
-	verify, err := ipns.Verify()
-	assert.Nil(t, err)
-	assert.True(t, verify)
+	err = ipns.Valid()
+	assert.NoError(t, err)
 }
 
 func TestLoadTestRecord(t *testing.T) {
@@ -60,7 +59,6 @@ func TestLoadTestRecord(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.Equal(t, ipns.Value(), "/ipfs/bafyaaeykceeaeeqlnbswy3dpo5xxe3debimaw")
 	assert.True(t, ipns.Entry.Validity.After(YEAR_100))
 
-	verify, err := ipns.Verify()
-	assert.Nil(t, err)
-	assert.True(t, verify)
+	err = ipns.Valid()
+	assert.NoError(t, err)
 }
diff --git a/tooling/ipns/kubo_name.go b/tooling/ipns/kubo_name.go
index b97fc9c..0cf288e 100644
--- a/tooling/ipns/kubo_name.go
+++ b/tooling/ipns/kubo_name.go
@@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ package ipns
 import (
 	"bytes"
 	"encoding/json"
-	"fmt"
 	"time"
 
 	"github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto"
@@ -16,7 +15,6 @@ import (
 	"github.com/ipld/go-ipld-prime"
 	"github.com/ipld/go-ipld-prime/codec/dagcbor"
 	"github.com/ipld/go-ipld-prime/codec/dagjson"
-	ic "github.com/libp2p/go-libp2p/core/crypto"
 	"github.com/libp2p/go-libp2p/core/peer"
 	mbase "github.com/multiformats/go-multibase"
 )
@@ -24,15 +22,15 @@ import (
 // IpnsInspectEntry contains the deserialized values from an IPNS Entry:
 // https://github.com/ipfs/specs/blob/main/ipns/IPNS.md#record-serialization-format
 type IpnsInspectEntry struct {
-	Value        string                     `json:"value"`
+	Value        string                          `json:"value"`
 	ValidityType *ipns_pb.IpnsEntry_ValidityType `json:"validityType"`
-	Validity     *time.Time                 `json:"validity"`
-	Sequence     uint64                     `json:"sequence"`
-	TTL          *uint64                    `json:"ttl"`
-	PublicKey    string                     `json:"publicKey"`
-	SignatureV1  string                     `json:"signatureV1"`
-	SignatureV2  string                     `json:"signatureV2"`
-	Data         interface{}                `json:"data"`
+	Validity     *time.Time                      `json:"validity"`
+	Sequence     uint64                          `json:"sequence"`
+	TTL          *uint64                         `json:"ttl"`
+	PublicKey    string                          `json:"publicKey"`
+	SignatureV1  string                          `json:"signatureV1"`
+	SignatureV2  string                          `json:"signatureV2"`
+	Data         interface{}                     `json:"data"`
 }
 
 func unmarshalIPNSEntry(data []byte) (*ipns_pb.IpnsEntry, error) {
@@ -90,7 +88,6 @@ func unmarshalIPNSRecord(entry *ipns_pb.IpnsEntry) (*IpnsInspectEntry, error) {
 		result.Validity = &validity
 	}
 
-
 	return &result, nil
 }
 
@@ -99,49 +96,3 @@ type IpnsInspectValidation struct {
 	Reason    string
 	PublicKey peer.ID
 }
-
-func verify(key string, entry *ipns_pb.IpnsEntry) (*IpnsInspectValidation, error) {
-	id, err := peer.Decode(key)
-	if err != nil {
-		return nil, err
-	}
-
-	validation := &IpnsInspectValidation{
-		PublicKey: id,
-	}
-
-	pub, err := id.ExtractPublicKey()
-	if err != nil {
-		// Make sure it works with all those RSA that cannot be embedded into the
-		// Peer ID.
-		if len(entry.PubKey) > 0 {
-			pub, err = ic.UnmarshalPublicKey(entry.PubKey)
-			if err != nil {
-				return nil, err
-			}
-
-			// Verify the public key matches the name we are verifying.
-			entryID, err := peer.IDFromPublicKey(pub)
-
-			if err != nil {
-				return nil, err
-			}
-
-			if id != entryID {
-				return nil, fmt.Errorf("record public key does not match the verified name")
-			}
-		}
-	}
-	if err != nil {
-		return nil, err
-	}
-
-	err = ipns.Validate(pub, entry)
-	if err == nil {
-		validation.Valid = true
-	} else {
-		validation.Reason = err.Error()
-	}
-
-	return validation, nil
-}
diff --git a/tooling/ipns/record.go b/tooling/ipns/record.go
index 49be37a..817db29 100644
--- a/tooling/ipns/record.go
+++ b/tooling/ipns/record.go
@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
 package ipns
 
 import (
+	"github.com/ipfs/boxo/ipns"
 	ipns_pb "github.com/ipfs/boxo/ipns/pb"
+	"github.com/libp2p/go-libp2p/core/peer"
 )
 
 type IpnsRecord struct {
@@ -36,12 +38,11 @@ func (i *IpnsRecord) Key() string {
 	return i.Entry.PublicKey
 }
 
-func (i *IpnsRecord) Verify() (bool, error) {
-	result, err := verify(i.Entry.PublicKey, i.Pb)
-
+func (i *IpnsRecord) Valid() error {
+	id, err := peer.Decode(i.Entry.PublicKey)
 	if err != nil {
-		return false, err
+		return err
 	}
 
-	return result.Valid, nil
+	return ipns.ValidateWithPeerID(id, i.Pb)
 }

I would also remove the IpnsInspectEntry and rework it somehow else. As I mentioned in the Boxo PR, that struct was made specifically for the ipns name inspect command and I don't think it's adequate to be used here.

Co-authored-by: Henrique Dias <[email protected]>

BigLep · 2023-05-10T15:00:46Z

Sadly, I can't commit here, so here it is:

@hacdias or @laurentsenta : lets add the w3dt-stewards team as an owner of this repo please.

laurentsenta · 2023-05-11T08:54:46Z

(team added in ipfs/github-mgmt#138 cc @BigLep @hacdias)

laurentsenta · 2023-05-11T13:21:35Z

Team, thanks for the feedbacks, and the patch @hacdias, the PR is complete and ready for review!

Note the Test won't pass until we release a new Kubo version, but Test Master is expected to pass.

Very nice overall. I also wanted to ask if there is any reason why we're keeping the bash code from the old sharness tests as comments. I would personally like to get them cleanup up, but I just want to understand the reasoning. Is it to make it clear which tests are which during the transitioning period from sharness to the gateway conformance suite?

Exactly, many tests are not complete because we're missing features (like ipns records fixtures), so keeping the comments helps keep track of what's done, what's in progress, and what's not started. When we're done porting the tests, we'll remove the comment and make it the v1.

laurentsenta · 2023-05-11T13:24:04Z

.github/workflows/test-master.yml

+          do
+              key=$(basename -s .ipns-record "$record" | cut -d'_' -f1)
+              ipfs routing put --allow-offline "/ipns/$key" "$record"
+          done


Reviewers, note this is how we move ipns records fixtures around,
we use a pubkey_...ipns-record file in the fixtures folder.

laurentsenta · 2023-05-11T13:24:40Z

tests/t0116_gateway_cache_test.go

+func TestGatewayCacheWithIPNS(t *testing.T) {
+	fixture := car.MustOpenUnixfsCar("t0116/gateway-cache.car")
+	ipns := ipns.MustOpenIPNSRecordWithKey("t0116/k51qzi5uqu5dlxdsdu5fpuu7h69wu4ohp32iwm9pdt9nq3y5rpn3ln9j12zfhe.ipns-record")
+	ipnsId := ipns.Key()


highlight: this is the API to use an ipns record

hacdias

Some minor notes, but everything else seems 👍

tests/t0116_gateway_cache_test.go

tests/t0124_gateway_ipns_record_test.go

tooling/ipns/record.go

Co-authored-by: Henrique Dias <[email protected]>

.github/workflows/test-master.yml

galargh · 2023-05-15T09:12:24Z

.github/workflows/test.yml

      - name: Setup Go
        uses: actions/setup-go@v3
        with:
-          go-version: 1.19.1
+          go-version: 1.20.4


We don't actually use Go here right now, do we?

Oh, but we will with the matrix!

Thanks for the catch; probably a leftover from before the containerization 👍

Note I'll merge the two tests.yml, which means we'll need go because we want to call:

- run: go install github.com/ipfs/kubo/cmd/ipfs@${{ matrix.target }}

In place of

# only work with released binaries - uses: ipfs/download-ipfs-distribution-action@v1

We probably could get away with using the default from the machine for this but it's fine to leave it in.

tests/t0124_gateway_ipns_record_test.go

galargh · 2023-05-15T09:21:20Z

tooling/ipns/check_test.go

+		t.Fatal(err)
+	}
+
+	check := IsIPNSKey("k51qzi5uqu5dgh7y9l90nqs6tvnzcm9erbt8fhzg3fu79p5qt9zb2izvfu51ki").IsValid()


Same here:

Suggested change

check := IsIPNSKey("k51qzi5uqu5dgh7y9l90nqs6tvnzcm9erbt8fhzg3fu79p5qt9zb2izvfu51ki").IsValid()

check := IsIPNSKey("k51qzi5uqu5dgh7y9l90nqs6tvnzcm9erbt8fhzg3fu79p5qt9zb2izvfu51ki")

galargh · 2023-05-15T09:21:41Z

tests/t0124_gateway_ipns_record_test.go

+					IsIPNSKey(ipnsKey).
+						IsValid().


And here:

Suggested change

IsIPNSKey(ipnsKey).

IsValid().

IsIPNSKey(ipnsKey)

tooling/ipns/ipns_test.go

tooling/test/test.go

galargh · 2023-05-15T09:32:37Z

Sadly, I can't commit here

Just an FYI, in a situation like this, you could create a fork and propose changes through a PR to the PR branch. And in case of smaller changes, you can always suggest them through a comment.

.github/workflows/test.yml

Co-authored-by: Piotr Galar <[email protected]>

lidel · 2023-05-16T21:42:40Z

tests/t0124_gateway_ipns_record_test.go

+					Header("Cache-Control").Contains("public, max-age=3155760000"),
+				).
+				Body(
+					IsIPNSKey(ipnsKey).


nit: what we get in response body is not IPNS Key :) It is IPNS Record.

the only "key" is the Multihash of the public key used in /ipns/{libp2p-key} aka /ipns/{ipns-name} -- https://specs.ipfs.tech/ipns/ipns-record/#ipns-name

we try to avoid "key" in other contexts, and use "ipns name" to avoid confusion

the body is IPNS Record serialized as protobuf -- https://specs.ipfs.tech/ipns/ipns-record/#record-serialization-format

@laurentsenta mind renaming this helper to use IPNSKey → IPNSRecord?

Fixed, thanks for the clarification!

README.md

lidel · 2023-05-16T21:55:20Z

tests/t0116_gateway_cache_test.go

+		{
+			Name: "GET for /ipns/ unixfs dir listing succeeds",
+			Request: Request().
+				Path("ipns/%s/root2/root3/", ipnsKey),


unrelated nit: every time we reference URL path, or IPFS content path, it should always start with /.

Looks weird otherwise, especially when we use Equals("/ipns/%s/root2/root3/" few lines below :)

That's fair, I'll create a follow-up task + PR to fix this!

lidel · 2023-05-16T22:10:29Z

.github/workflows/test.yml

+          for record in $records
+          do
+              key=$(basename -s .ipns-record "$record" | cut -d'_' -f1)
+              ipfs routing put --allow-offline "/ipns/$key" "$record"


💭 (not a blocker, just a note for the future) when ipfs/specs#369 is figured out, we will be able to remove our reliance on ipfs routing put

Co-authored-by: Marcin Rataj <[email protected]>

lidel

lgtm, thank you!

lidel · 2023-05-18T10:21:59Z

tests/t0124_gateway_ipns_record_test.go

+				Headers(
+					Header("Content-Disposition").Contains("attachment;"),
+					Header("Content-Type").Contains("application/vnd.ipfs.ipns-record"),
+					Header("Cache-Control").Contains("public, max-age=3155760000"),


@laurentsenta all tests use the same timestamp, humans are lazy, which means some implementers will just hard-code Cache-Control and call it a day :P

Mind adding one more test that has record with slightly different TTL, and call it out in the test Name that Cache-Control max-age MUST be based on the TTL from the IPNS Record? (fine to do it in a separate PR)

Will do, I created #51

laurentsenta marked this pull request as draft April 10, 2023 13:32

laurentsenta changed the base branch from main to feat/add-t0109-with-dnslink April 10, 2023 13:34

lidel reviewed Apr 13, 2023

View reviewed changes

cmd/gateway-conformance/main.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

lidel reviewed Apr 13, 2023

View reviewed changes

tooling/ipns/kubo_name.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

laurentsenta mentioned this pull request May 2, 2023

feat(routing): allow-offline with routing put ipfs/boxo#278

Merged

hacdias reviewed May 8, 2023

View reviewed changes

tests/t0124_gateway_ipns_record_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

hacdias reviewed May 8, 2023

View reviewed changes

tests/t0124_gateway_ipns_record_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

hacdias reviewed May 8, 2023

View reviewed changes

tests/t0124_gateway_ipns_record_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

hacdias reviewed May 8, 2023

View reviewed changes

tests/t0124_gateway_ipns_record_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

hacdias reviewed May 8, 2023

View reviewed changes

tooling/ipns/ipns.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

hacdias reviewed May 8, 2023

View reviewed changes

laurentsenta force-pushed the feat/add-t0109-with-dnslink branch from ed96dd0 to fbce0ea Compare May 9, 2023 08:53

laurentsenta force-pushed the feat/add-t0124-with-ipns branch from 7123854 to 0222f5e Compare May 9, 2023 13:21

This was referenced May 9, 2023

feat: reusable ipns verify ipfs/boxo#292

Merged

feat: reusable ipns verify ipfs/kubo#9867

Merged

laurentsenta force-pushed the feat/add-t0109-with-dnslink branch from 1be71ab to 83c417c Compare May 9, 2023 14:47

Base automatically changed from feat/add-t0109-with-dnslink to main May 9, 2023 14:57

laurentsenta and others added 4 commits May 10, 2023 15:21

feat: add ipns fixtures

55abe96

test: complete & fix t0116 ipns

7c8edd0

fix: update name in t0124

a9604fa

Co-authored-by: Henrique Dias <[email protected]>

fix: remove dead code

aef104e

laurentsenta force-pushed the feat/add-t0124-with-ipns branch from 0222f5e to ba5a83b Compare May 10, 2023 13:47

laurentsenta force-pushed the feat/add-t0124-with-ipns branch from 4779b15 to d3e25ce Compare May 11, 2023 13:12

laurentsenta requested a review from galargh May 11, 2023 13:12

laurentsenta marked this pull request as ready for review May 11, 2023 13:15

laurentsenta requested review from hacdias and lidel May 11, 2023 13:21

laurentsenta commented May 11, 2023

View reviewed changes

hacdias approved these changes May 12, 2023

View reviewed changes

tests/t0116_gateway_cache_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

tests/t0124_gateway_ipns_record_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved

tooling/ipns/record.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

laurentsenta and others added 2 commits May 12, 2023 13:49

fix: naming ipnsKey

03d24a0

fix: test name in ipns record

2d532a3

Co-authored-by: Henrique Dias <[email protected]>

galargh reviewed May 15, 2023

View reviewed changes

ci: use test matrix for kubo version in test

3ca2da3

laurentsenta force-pushed the feat/add-t0124-with-ipns branch from 16f9bba to 3ca2da3 Compare May 15, 2023 12:38

galargh approved these changes May 15, 2023

View reviewed changes

galargh reviewed May 15, 2023

View reviewed changes

.github/workflows/test.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

ci: fail fast during testing

ab51e6d

Co-authored-by: Piotr Galar <[email protected]>

lidel requested changes May 16, 2023

View reviewed changes

lidel reviewed May 16, 2023

View reviewed changes

laurentsenta and others added 4 commits May 17, 2023 08:57

fix: docs

de8e17b

Co-authored-by: Marcin Rataj <[email protected]>

fix: IPNSRecord naming

08d2e44

feat: ipns check requires IsValid call

6999e7d

fix: go fmt

6520160

laurentsenta requested a review from lidel May 17, 2023 10:46

lidel approved these changes May 18, 2023

View reviewed changes

laurentsenta mentioned this pull request May 18, 2023

Update t0124 with a test that relies on a different timestamp #51

Open

laurentsenta merged commit 93bc763 into main May 18, 2023

laurentsenta deleted the feat/add-t0124-with-ipns branch May 18, 2023 12:55

laurentsenta mentioned this pull request Jun 26, 2023

feat: add timeouts #89

Open

2 tasks

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

feat: add t0124 with ipns fixtures #37

feat: add t0124 with ipns fixtures #37

laurentsenta commented Apr 10, 2023 •

edited

Loading

laurentsenta commented Apr 10, 2023

laurentsenta commented Apr 12, 2023

BigLep commented May 1, 2023

BigLep commented May 5, 2023

hacdias left a comment •

edited

Loading

laurentsenta commented May 9, 2023 •

edited

Loading

hacdias commented May 10, 2023

BigLep commented May 10, 2023

laurentsenta commented May 11, 2023

laurentsenta commented May 11, 2023 •

edited

Loading

laurentsenta May 11, 2023

laurentsenta May 11, 2023

hacdias left a comment

galargh May 15, 2023

galargh May 15, 2023

laurentsenta May 15, 2023 •

edited

Loading

galargh May 15, 2023

galargh May 15, 2023

galargh May 15, 2023

galargh commented May 15, 2023

lidel May 16, 2023

laurentsenta May 17, 2023

lidel May 16, 2023 •

edited

Loading

laurentsenta May 17, 2023

lidel May 16, 2023 •

edited

Loading

lidel left a comment

lidel May 18, 2023

laurentsenta May 18, 2023

	check := IsIPNSKey("k51qzi5uqu5dgh7y9l90nqs6tvnzcm9erbt8fhzg3fu79p5qt9zb2izvfu51ki").IsValid()
	check := IsIPNSKey("k51qzi5uqu5dgh7y9l90nqs6tvnzcm9erbt8fhzg3fu79p5qt9zb2izvfu51ki")

feat: add t0124 with ipns fixtures #37

feat: add t0124 with ipns fixtures #37

Conversation

laurentsenta commented Apr 10, 2023 • edited Loading

Todo

Follow-up

laurentsenta commented Apr 10, 2023

laurentsenta commented Apr 12, 2023

BigLep commented May 1, 2023

BigLep commented May 5, 2023

hacdias left a comment • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

laurentsenta commented May 9, 2023 • edited Loading

hacdias commented May 10, 2023

BigLep commented May 10, 2023

laurentsenta commented May 11, 2023

laurentsenta commented May 11, 2023 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

hacdias left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

laurentsenta May 15, 2023 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

galargh commented May 15, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

lidel May 16, 2023 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

lidel May 16, 2023 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

lidel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

laurentsenta commented Apr 10, 2023 •

edited

Loading

hacdias left a comment •

edited

Loading

laurentsenta commented May 9, 2023 •

edited

Loading

laurentsenta commented May 11, 2023 •

edited

Loading

laurentsenta May 15, 2023 •

edited

Loading

lidel May 16, 2023 •

edited

Loading

lidel May 16, 2023 •

edited

Loading