fix: remove unnecessary context branching #294
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Dependency Review✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.OpenSSF Scorecard
Scanned Files |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
x/ibc-hooks/move-hooks/receive.go (1)
127-132: Document the architectural decision.Consider adding a code comment explaining why context caching was removed here, mentioning that state branching is handled by the parent context. This will help future maintainers understand the design decision.
func (h MoveHooks) execMsg(ctx sdk.Context, msg *movetypes.MsgExecute) (*movetypes.MsgExecuteResponse, error) { if err := msg.Validate(h.ac); err != nil { return nil, err } + // Note: Context caching is handled by the parent IBC middleware, + // so we don't need to cache the context here moveMsgServer := movekeeper.NewMsgServerImpl(h.moveKeeper) res, err := moveMsgServer.Execute(ctx, msg)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
x/ibc-hooks/move-hooks/receive.go(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
x/ibc-hooks/move-hooks/receive.go (1)
127-127: LGTM! Verify parent context handling.
The removal of context caching aligns with the PR objective and simplifies the code. However, let's verify that the parent context properly handles state branching.
Let's verify the parent context handling:
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #294 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 40.91% 40.94% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 268 268
Lines 25589 25657 +68
==========================================
+ Hits 10470 10504 +34
- Misses 13495 13523 +28
- Partials 1624 1630 +6
|
Description
We already branching the context before executing
execMsg, so don't need to do another branching for execute.Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...