Sinplified func(self) #309
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks for the patch, i agree the snippet of code could be imporved. However putting everything on one line doesn't make it more readable IMO. I would suggest to simply remove the else as it's not needed. |
hlorus
reviewed
Nov 1, 2022
| @@ -20,11 +20,7 @@ def slvs_entity_pointer(cls, name, **kwargs): | |||
| @property | |||
| def func(self): | |||
| index = getattr(self, index_prop) | |||
| if index == -1: | |||
| return None | |||
| else: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Simply removing this line and unindenting the else block improves readability alot.
amrsoll
reviewed
Nov 1, 2022
model/utilities.py
Outdated
| else: | ||
| return bpy.context.scene.sketcher.entities.get(index) | ||
|
|
||
| return none if index == -1 else bpy.context.scene.sketcher.entities.get(index) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
simplified code using ternary ( not tested )