You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We'd probably need a new area for fragments / scripts for All note types, from the fragment can be shared to individual note types.
Fragments / script would need a new field for backreference, whether they were originally implemented directly on the note type, or shared from "all note types".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I suggest that you rework entirely how this addon works. Instead of giving assets "owners" (ie. binding an asset to a particular note type), I think assets should be created independently, and then for each asset you could check-in every note that should have that one.
For instance, you could have add a button to the tools menu with "Manage assets", which would show the full list of assets, with approximately the same interface that we have now. Then, you could click on one asset to manage it. This would open a window with all the settings. On this window, one button would allow you to edit the asset. An other button would allow you to open the list of all the notes, with a checkbox next to it. When you click on "Confirm", it closes this window, and updates the notes so that the asset is loaded for every note that was checked.
With this setup, there is no need for a backreference. All the assets could be saved in the media collection, as standalones.
We'd probably need a new area for fragments / scripts for All note types, from the fragment can be shared to individual note types.
Fragments / script would need a new field for
backreference
, whether they were originally implemented directly on the note type, or shared from "all note types".The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: