Enhance README with usage examples and output samples

[guibranco]

Description

• Improved the README.md file by adding a "Sample output" section to illustrate the action's results.
• Introduced horizontal rules for better visual separation of sections.
• Clarified the "Example" section to enhance user understanding.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	README.md Enhance README with usage examples and output samples        README.md Added a section for "Sample output" with examples of success and failure. Introduced horizontal rules for better section separation. Enhanced the "Example" section with clearer formatting. +15/-0

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Enhanced the README.md with a new "Sample output" section to illustrate the GitHub action's results.
  • Added subsections detailing expected outcomes for both successful checks and failures related to secret leaks.
  • Improved document formatting for better readability.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@gstraccini[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 24 minutes and 35 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 51e546c and 9bee22e.

Walkthrough

The changes involve updates to the README.md file, specifically the addition of new sections that document the GitHub action for checking secret leaks using the Infisical CLI. New sections titled "Sample output," along with subsections for "Success - no secrets leaked" and "Failure - secrets leaked," have been included to illustrate the action's output. The document has also been reformatted for improved readability.

Changes

File	Change Summary
README.md	Added ## Sample output, ### Success - no secrets leaked, and ### Failure - secrets leaked sections. Reformatted with horizontal rules for better readability.

Poem

In the garden of code, a new tale unfolds,
With secrets revealed, and stories retold.
A sample of output, both bright and clear,
Guides all the users, bringing them cheer.
So hop with delight, let the changes take flight,
For in every new line, there's magic and light! 🐇✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[penify-dev]

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	1, because the changes are straightforward and primarily involve documentation enhancements.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No

[penify-dev]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Best practice	Correct the image syntax to ensure proper rendering in Markdown Use proper syntax for image links to ensure they render correctly in Markdown. README.md [51-55] -+[!success](success.png) -+[!failure](failure.png) + + Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: This suggestion addresses a clear issue with image rendering in Markdown, which is crucial for the documentation's effectiveness.	8
Enhancement	Improve the example YAML block formatting and content for clarity Ensure that the example YAML block is properly formatted and includes relevant details for better clarity. README.md [26-44] -```yml +```yaml +# Example of a GitHub Action configuration +name: Example Action +on: [push] +jobs: + build: + runs-on: ubuntu-latest + steps: + - name: Run the action + uses: guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@latest +``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: The suggestion improves clarity by enhancing the example YAML block, which is important for user understanding, though the existing example is not entirely incorrect.	7
	Add context to the sample output section for better understanding Consider adding a brief description or context for the sample output to enhance understanding. README.md [47] -+## Sample output +## Sample output +Below are examples of the action's output for both success and failure scenarios. Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: Adding context to the sample output improves user understanding, but the lack of context does not severely hinder comprehension of the output.	6
Maintainability	Remove or replace placeholder lines with meaningful content Replace the placeholder lines with meaningful content or remove them entirely to avoid confusion. README.md [12-13] -+--- -+--- +<!-- Placeholder for future content --> Suggestion importance[1-10]: 3 Why: The suggestion addresses placeholder lines, but the placeholders are not causing significant confusion in the context of the document.	3