Split general content (intro, discussion) across sections #735
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I definitely agree with this. One round of pull requests can remap existing content into files. Then a separate round of pull requests can rephrase and edit as needed. |
|
AppVeyor build 1.0.2525 for commit 0f05d6b is now complete. Found 0 potential spelling error(s). Preview:... |
|
AppVeyor build 1.0.2527 for commit a4c45f5 is now complete. Found 0 potential spelling error(s). Preview:... |
|
Looks great, easy to follow. |
This was referenced Dec 17, 2020
|
AppVeyor build 1.0.2528 ... Found 0 potential spelling error(s). Preview:for commit d5c5262 is now complete. The rendered manuscript from this build is temporarily available for download at: |
|
@RLordan if this looks ok to you, would you mind approving it? Excited to finish up the therapeutics section!!! 🎉 |
ajlee21
approved these changes
Dec 19, 2020
|
Safe travels @RLordan! I know this is often a very busy time of year! Enjoy your UPenn holidays! |
|
Thanks a million @rando2! Delighted to see the journals interest |
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2020
[ci skip] This build is based on afd156b. This commit was created by the following CI build and job: https://github.com/greenelab/covid19-review/commit/afd156b5bcc254c41be05683e8b1cd78f22f2ae3/checks https://github.com/greenelab/covid19-review/runs/435940762
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2020
[ci skip] This build is based on afd156b. This commit was created by the following CI build and job: https://github.com/greenelab/covid19-review/commit/afd156b5bcc254c41be05683e8b1cd78f22f2ae3/checks https://github.com/greenelab/covid19-review/runs/435940762
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of the proposed additions or changes
This is a general proposal of how to move around the material from the intro and discussion. It is not incorporated very fluidly into the new locations in this PR, but I think separating these processes out will make it a lot easier to track the history of who worked on what!
Related issues
This is rebased on top of #734, so should not be merged until after that one is. Right now the changes proposed in #734 are also proposed here. I'm marking it as a draft to make sure there is no issue.
Suggested reviewers (optional)
Checklist