-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: [#449] Implement HTTP response stream #77
Conversation
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are limited to specific labels. Labels to auto review (1)
Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
context_response.go
Outdated
@@ -89,6 +89,10 @@ func (r *ContextResponse) Status(code int) contractshttp.ResponseStatus { | |||
return NewStatus(r.instance, code) | |||
} | |||
|
|||
func (r *ContextResponse) Stream(step func(w contractshttp.StreamWriter) error, code int, contentType string) contractshttp.Response { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need to set contentType
for stream? If the contentType
is only used by SSE, can we add another SSEvent
method to deal with it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is not necessary; we can remove contentType
. We don't need the SSEvent
method since we provide the Header
method, allowing the user to set it directly if needed.
ctx.Response().Header("Content-Type", "text/event-stream").Stream(...)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great π
context_response_test.go
Outdated
return r.closeChannel | ||
} | ||
|
||
func (r *TestResponseRecorder) closeClient() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this method used?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Where? I don't find the case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed
response.go
Outdated
|
||
w := NewStreamWriter(r.instance) | ||
|
||
clientGone := r.instance.Writer.CloseNotify() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ohh, you are right, missed it.
context_response_test.go
Outdated
type TestResponseRecorder struct { | ||
*httptest.ResponseRecorder | ||
closeChannel chan bool | ||
} | ||
|
||
func CreateTestResponseRecorder() *TestResponseRecorder { | ||
return &TestResponseRecorder{ | ||
httptest.NewRecorder(), | ||
make(chan bool, 1), | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
func (r *TestResponseRecorder) CloseNotify() <-chan bool { | ||
return r.closeChannel | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we remove this now?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
removed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great PR, LGTM
π Description
Closes goravel/goravel#449
@coderabbitai summary
β Checks