feat: [#519] Save container to a temp file #721
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a variety of changes across multiple files, primarily focusing on enhancing the database management and testing utilities. Key modifications include updates to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️
Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.50.
| Benchmark suite | Current: f7010d4 | Previous: 235c88e | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark_Panic |
0.001086 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op |
0.0006841 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op |
1.59 |
Benchmark_Panic - ns/op |
0.001086 ns/op |
0.0006841 ns/op |
1.59 |
BenchmarkFile_ReadWrite |
341476 ns/op 1801 B/op 21 allocs/op |
204708 ns/op 1800 B/op 21 allocs/op |
1.67 |
BenchmarkFile_ReadWrite - ns/op |
341476 ns/op |
204708 ns/op |
1.67 |
This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #721 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 69.73% 69.72% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 202 202
Lines 15875 16107 +232
==========================================
+ Hits 11071 11230 +159
- Misses 4201 4242 +41
- Partials 603 635 +32 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Manage docker containers in a temp file, the content is:
support/docker/container_manager.go
Outdated
| func (r *ContainerManager) lock() { | ||
| for { | ||
| if !file.Exists(r.lockFile) { | ||
| break | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| if err := file.Create(r.lockFile, ""); err != nil { | ||
| panic(err) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func (r *ContainerManager) unlock() { | ||
| if err := file.Remove(r.lockFile); err != nil { | ||
| panic(err) | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To avoid write temp file conflict when testing multiple packages.
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func (receiver *MysqlImpl) Driver() database.Driver { | ||
| func (r *MysqlImpl) Database(name string) (testing.DatabaseDriver, error) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Create a new database in the existing docker container.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 21
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (62)
database/schema/common_schema_test.go (1)
21-21: Fix grammatical error in skip messageThe skip message contains a grammatical error.
-t.Skip("Skip test that using Docker") +t.Skip("Skip test that uses Docker")database/schema/postgres_schema_test.go (1)
24-24: Fix grammatical error in skip messageThe current skip message contains grammatical errors. Consider using one of these alternatives:
- "Skipping tests that use Docker" (original)
- "Skip tests using Docker"
-t.Skip("Skip test that using Docker") +t.Skip("Skipping tests that use Docker")contracts/testing/testing.go (2)
30-31: Well-designed method for container reuse strategyThe new Database method effectively supports the PR's goal of reusing containers by allowing creation of multiple database instances within the same container. The error return ensures robust error handling.
Consider documenting the following in the package documentation:
- The lifecycle management pattern (Build → Ready → Database)
- Best practices for error handling when creating multiple databases
- Guidelines for cleaning up databases created with this method
45-50: Good addition of ContainerID for container trackingThe addition of ContainerID to DatabaseConfig enables proper container instance tracking, which is essential for the container reuse strategy.
Consider adding the following features to enhance container management:
- Methods to validate ContainerID format
- Utilities to check container existence
- Documentation about ContainerID lifecycle and cleanup responsibilities
support/docker/sqlite.go (3)
25-26: Enhance error message clarityConsider providing more context in the error message to help with debugging.
- if _, err := r.connect(); err != nil { - return fmt.Errorf("connect Sqlite error: %v", err) + if _, err := r.connect(); err != nil { + return fmt.Errorf("failed to connect to SQLite database '%s': %v", r.database, err)
52-57: Enhance error message clarityConsider providing more context in the error message for better debugging.
- if _, err := r.connect(); err != nil { - return fmt.Errorf("connect Sqlite error when freshing: %v", err) + if _, err := r.connect(); err != nil { + return fmt.Errorf("failed to reconnect to SQLite database '%s' during refresh: %v", r.database, err)
74-75: Enhance error message clarityConsider providing more context in the error message.
- if err := file.Remove(r.database); err != nil { - return fmt.Errorf("stop Sqlite error: %v", err) + if err := file.Remove(r.database); err != nil { + return fmt.Errorf("failed to remove SQLite database file '%s': %v", r.database, err)support/docker/sqlite_test.go (1)
70-74: Enhance test coverage for database isolationWhile the test verifies basic driver functionality, consider adding assertions to ensure:
- The new database is actually created
- It's using the same container (validating container reuse)
- Data isolation between databases
Example enhancement:
databaseDriver, err := s.sqlite.Database("another") s.NoError(err) s.NotNil(databaseDriver) + +// Verify database creation +instance2, err := databaseDriver.(*SqliteImpl).connect() +s.NoError(err) + +// Create table in "another" database +res := instance2.Exec(`CREATE TABLE test_isolation (id INT)`) +s.NoError(res.Error) + +// Verify table doesn't exist in original database +var count int64 +res = instance.Raw("SELECT count(*) FROM sqlite_master WHERE type='table' AND name = 'test_isolation'").Scan(&count) +s.NoError(res.Error) +s.Equal(int64(0), count) + s.NoError(databaseDriver.Stop())support/docker/utils.go (2)
17-18: Consider using a test-specific approach instead of a global variableWhile the global
testPortUsingvariable works for testing, it could lead to test isolation issues. Consider alternatives:
- Move this into a test configuration struct
- Use dependency injection for port checking behavior
Example approach:
type PortChecker interface { IsPortUsing(port int) bool } type DefaultPortChecker struct { testMode bool }
20-31: Address potential race condition in port checkingWhile the implementation is generally sound, there's a potential race condition between checking port availability and actually using it. Another process could take the port between the check and use.
Consider:
- Implementing port reservation mechanism
- Adding retry logic with backoff
- Using a port range with atomic operations
Example approach:
func reservePort(port int, maxRetries int) (net.Listener, error) { for i := 0; i < maxRetries; i++ { if l, err := net.Listen("tcp", fmt.Sprintf(":%d", port)); err == nil { return l, nil } time.Sleep(backoff(i)) } return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to reserve port after %d attempts", maxRetries) }support/docker/docker_test.go (1)
33-37: Consider maintaining consistent test organization.The PostgreSQL test case is placed outside the
TestModelNormalcondition while similar "multiple" test cases for other databases remain inside. This creates an inconsistency in test organization.Consider either:
- Moving all "multiple" test cases outside the condition if they should always run
- Keeping this test case inside the condition for consistency with other database types
support/docker/sqlserver_test.go (1)
75-78: Enhance Database method test coverageWhile the basic functionality is tested, consider enhancing the test coverage to verify:
- The new database is actually created and accessible
- The new database is properly isolated from the main database
- The user has correct permissions on the new database
Consider adding these verifications:
databaseDriver, err := s.sqlserver.Database("another") s.NoError(err) s.NotNil(databaseDriver) + + // Verify database creation + var dbExists int + instance.Raw(` + SELECT COUNT(*) + FROM sys.databases + WHERE name = 'another' + `).Scan(&dbExists) + s.Equal(1, dbExists) + + // Verify database isolation + instance2, err := databaseDriver.Connect() + s.NoError(err) + res := instance2.Exec(` + CREATE TABLE test_isolation (id int); + INSERT INTO test_isolation VALUES (1); + `) + s.NoError(res.Error) + + // Verify the table doesn't exist in main database + var tableExists int + instance.Raw(` + SELECT COUNT(*) + FROM sys.tables + WHERE name = 'test_isolation' + `).Scan(&tableExists) + s.Equal(0, tableExists)support/docker/postgres_test.go (2)
14-18: LGTM with a minor security suggestion.The constants are well-organized and used consistently throughout the test suite. However, consider using a simpler password for test environments as complex passwords aren't necessary here and might make the tests harder to maintain.
- testPassword = "Framework!123" + testPassword = "password123"
80-82: Consider enhancing the database driver test.While the test verifies that a new database driver can be obtained, it would be more robust to verify that the database was actually created and is usable. This ensures the container reuse functionality works as intended.
Consider adding these verifications:
databaseDriver, err := s.postgres.Database("another") s.NoError(err) s.NotNil(databaseDriver) + + // Verify the new database is created and usable + db, err := databaseDriver.DB() + s.NoError(err) + s.NoError(db.Ping()) + + // Verify we can create and query tables in the new database + res := databaseDriver.Exec(`CREATE TABLE test (id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY)`) + s.NoError(res.Error)support/docker/container_manager_test.go (3)
15-21: Enhance the test skip message for Windows environments.While skipping tests on Windows is appropriate, the skip message could be more informative about why the test is being skipped.
Consider this improvement:
- t.Skip("Skip test that using Docker") + t.Skip("Skipping Docker-based tests on Windows environment")
27-44: Consider enhancing container cleanup and validation.Two potential improvements for this test method:
- Consider stopping all containers after retrieval, not just SQLite, to prevent resource leaks.
- Add validation of container configurations (port, credentials, etc.) for each retrieved container.
Example enhancement:
func (s *ContainerManagerTestSuite) TestGet() { + // Helper function to verify container configuration + verifyContainer := func(driver ContainerDriver, expectedType ContainerType) { + s.NoError(err) + s.NotNil(driver) + config := driver.Config() + s.NotEmpty(config) + // Add specific configuration checks based on container type + } + driver, err := s.containerManager.Get(ContainerTypeMysql) - s.NoError(err) - s.NotNil(driver) + verifyContainer(driver, ContainerTypeMysql) + defer driver.Stop() // ... repeat for other container types }
1-80: Consider implementing a test container configuration provider.To improve the maintainability and reusability of container test configurations, consider implementing a dedicated test configuration provider that would:
- Manage test credentials and configuration centrally
- Handle dynamic port allocation to prevent conflicts
- Provide consistent container configuration across all database types
- Include retry mechanisms for container operations
This would make the tests more robust and easier to maintain.
support/env/env.go (1)
11-19: Consider making the temp path configurableThe hardcoded path "/storage/temp" in
IsAir()might make the function fragile if Air's configuration changes. Consider making this path configurable or using a more reliable method to detect Air execution.+var airTempPath = "/storage/temp" + func IsAir() bool { for _, arg := range os.Args { - if strings.Contains(filepath.ToSlash(arg), "/storage/temp") { + if strings.Contains(filepath.ToSlash(arg), airTempPath) { return true } }testing/docker/docker_test.go (1)
22-24: Enhance the test skip message for clarityWhile the Windows environment check is good, the skip message could be more descriptive to help developers understand why these tests are skipped on Windows.
Consider this improvement:
- t.Skip("Skip test that using Docker") + t.Skip("Skipping Docker-based tests on Windows as they may not function correctly in this environment")database/migration/repository_test.go (2)
22-22: Consider improving the grammar in the skip message.The current message "Skip test that using Docker" has grammatical issues. Consider using one of these alternatives:
- "Skipping test that uses Docker"
- "Skip test using Docker"
- t.Skip("Skip test that using Docker") + t.Skip("Skipping test that uses Docker")
30-31: LGTM! Important container readiness check.The addition of the PostgreSQL container readiness check is a crucial improvement that aligns with the PR's objective of optimizing container management. This ensures tests only proceed when the container is fully operational, preventing potential flaky tests.
This pattern of checking container readiness before tests is a good practice that should be consistently applied across all database-related test suites.
support/docker/postgres.go (2)
100-115: Simplify connection handling in Fresh methodThe method works correctly but can be improved for better resource management.
Suggested improvement:
func (r *PostgresImpl) Fresh() error { gormDB, err := r.connect() if err != nil { return fmt.Errorf("connect Postgres error when clearing: %v", err) } + defer r.close(gormDB) if res := gormDB.Exec("DROP SCHEMA public CASCADE;"); res.Error != nil { return fmt.Errorf("drop schema of Postgres error: %v", res.Error) } if res := gormDB.Exec("CREATE SCHEMA public;"); res.Error != nil { return fmt.Errorf("create schema of Postgres error: %v", res.Error) } - return r.close(gormDB) + return nil }
Line range hint
138-167: Consider adding timeout configuration and context supportWhile the connection handling works, it could be improved with more flexible timeout control.
Consider these improvements:
- Make retry attempts and intervals configurable
- Add context support for better timeout control
Example implementation:
+const ( + defaultMaxRetries = 60 + defaultRetryInterval = 2 * time.Second +) -func (r *PostgresImpl) connect() (*gormio.DB, error) { +func (r *PostgresImpl) connect(ctx context.Context) (*gormio.DB, error) { var ( instance *gormio.DB err error ) - for i := 0; i < 60; i++ { + for i := 0; i < defaultMaxRetries; i++ { + select { + case <-ctx.Done(): + return nil, ctx.Err() + default: instance, err = gormio.Open(postgres.New(postgres.Config{ DSN: fmt.Sprintf("postgres://%s:%s@%s:%d/%s", r.username, r.password, r.host, r.port, r.database), })) if err == nil { break } - time.Sleep(2 * time.Second) + time.Sleep(defaultRetryInterval) + } } return instance, err }database/migration/sql_migrator_test.go (2)
29-29: Fix grammatical error in skip message.The current skip message has grammatical issues. Consider using one of these alternatives:
- "Skipping tests that use Docker" (original)
- "Skip tests using Docker"
- t.Skip("Skip test that using Docker") + t.Skip("Skipping tests that use Docker")
41-43: Consider container cleanup for all database drivers.While the SQLite container cleanup is good, consider implementing similar cleanup for other database drivers in
driverToTestQueryto ensure complete resource cleanup after tests.func (s *SqlMigratorSuite) TearDownTest() { s.NoError(file.Remove("database")) - if s.driverToTestQuery[contractsdatabase.DriverSqlite] != nil { - s.NoError(s.driverToTestQuery[contractsdatabase.DriverSqlite].Docker().Stop()) - } + for driver, testQuery := range s.driverToTestQuery { + if testQuery != nil { + s.NoError(testQuery.Docker().Stop()) + } + } }support/docker/mysql.go (4)
112-118: Improve error message consistency.Consider standardizing error messages to match the format used in other methods.
- return fmt.Errorf("connect Mysql error when clearing: %v", err) + return fmt.Errorf("connect MySQL error: %v", err) - return fmt.Errorf("get tables of Mysql error: %v", res.Error) + return fmt.Errorf("get MySQL tables error: %v", res.Error)
143-147: Consider adding timeout to Ready check.The Ready method should include a timeout to avoid indefinite waiting.
func (r *MysqlImpl) Ready() error { + ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), 30*time.Second) + defer cancel() + + errCh := make(chan error, 1) + go func() { _, err := r.connect() + errCh <- err + }() - return err + select { + case err := <-errCh: + return err + case <-ctx.Done(): + return fmt.Errorf("timeout waiting for MySQL to be ready") + } }
149-150: Add container existence check before stopping.Consider verifying the container exists before attempting to stop it.
func (r *MysqlImpl) Stop() error { + if r.containerID == "" { + return nil + } if _, err := run(fmt.Sprintf("docker stop %s", r.containerID)); err != nil { return fmt.Errorf("stop Mysql error: %v", err) }
157-171: Improve retry mechanism configuration.Consider making retry attempts and delay configurable, and add exponential backoff.
+const ( + maxRetries = 60 + initialRetryDelay = 2 * time.Second +) func (r *MysqlImpl) connect(username ...string) (*gormio.DB, error) { var ( instance *gormio.DB err error + retryDelay = initialRetryDelay ) useUsername := r.username if len(username) > 0 { useUsername = username[0] } - for i := 0; i < 60; i++ { + for i := 0; i < maxRetries; i++ { instance, err = gormio.Open(mysql.New(mysql.Config{ DSN: fmt.Sprintf("%s:%s@tcp(%s:%d)/%s", useUsername, r.password, r.host, r.port, r.database), })) if err == nil { break } - time.Sleep(2 * time.Second) + time.Sleep(retryDelay) + retryDelay = min(retryDelay * 2, 10 * time.Second) // Exponential backoff with max delay }support/docker/sqlserver.go (3)
Line range hint
81-106: Consider wrapping table cleanup in a transaction.The Fresh method could benefit from transaction wrapping to ensure atomic cleanup operations. If an error occurs mid-cleanup, the database could be left in an inconsistent state.
func (r *SqlserverImpl) Fresh() error { instance, err := r.connect() if err != nil { return fmt.Errorf("connect Sqlserver error when clearing: %v", err) } + tx := instance.Begin() + if tx.Error != nil { + return fmt.Errorf("failed to begin transaction: %v", tx.Error) + } - res := instance.Raw("SELECT NAME FROM SYSOBJECTS WHERE TYPE='U';") + res := tx.Raw("SELECT NAME FROM SYSOBJECTS WHERE TYPE='U';") if res.Error != nil { + tx.Rollback() return fmt.Errorf("get tables of Sqlserver error: %v", res.Error) } var tables []string res = res.Scan(&tables) if res.Error != nil { + tx.Rollback() return fmt.Errorf("get tables of Sqlserver error: %v", res.Error) } for _, table := range tables { - res = instance.Exec(fmt.Sprintf("drop table %s;", table)) + res = tx.Exec(fmt.Sprintf("drop table %s;", table)) if res.Error != nil { + tx.Rollback() return fmt.Errorf("drop table %s of Sqlserver error: %v", table, res.Error) } } + if err := tx.Commit().Error; err != nil { + return fmt.Errorf("failed to commit transaction: %v", err) + } return nil }
118-124: Consider adding container cleanup after stop.The method stops the container but doesn't remove it, which could lead to orphaned containers accumulating over time.
func (r *SqlserverImpl) Stop() error { if _, err := run(fmt.Sprintf("docker stop %s", r.containerID)); err != nil { return fmt.Errorf("stop Sqlserver error: %v", err) } + if _, err := run(fmt.Sprintf("docker rm %s", r.containerID)); err != nil { + return fmt.Errorf("remove Sqlserver container error: %v", err) + } return nil }
Line range hint
126-187: Consider optimizing connection retry strategy and adding transaction support.The implementation has a few areas for potential improvement:
- The 2-second retry delay could significantly impact test execution time.
- Database and user creation operations could benefit from transaction wrapping.
- Consider extracting the database setup logic into a separate method for better maintainability.
Consider these optimizations:
- Reduce retry delay and add exponential backoff:
- time.Sleep(2 * time.Second) + sleepTime := time.Duration(i * 100) * time.Millisecond + if sleepTime > 2 * time.Second { + sleepTime = 2 * time.Second + } + time.Sleep(sleepTime)
- Extract database setup into a separate method:
func (r *SqlserverImpl) setupDatabase(instance *gormio.DB) error { tx := instance.Begin() if tx.Error != nil { return fmt.Errorf("failed to begin transaction: %v", tx.Error) } defer func() { if r := recover(); r != nil { tx.Rollback() } }() // Create database if not exists if err := tx.Exec(fmt.Sprintf(`CREATE DATABASE "%s";`, r.database)).Error; err != nil { tx.Rollback() return err } // Create user if not exists if err := tx.Exec(fmt.Sprintf("CREATE LOGIN %s WITH PASSWORD = '%s'", r.username, r.password)).Error; err != nil { tx.Rollback() return err } // Setup permissions if err := tx.Exec(fmt.Sprintf("USE %s; CREATE USER %s FOR LOGIN %s", r.database, r.username, r.username)).Error; err != nil { tx.Rollback() return err } if err := tx.Exec(fmt.Sprintf("USE %s; ALTER ROLE db_owner ADD MEMBER %s", r.database, r.username)).Error; err != nil { tx.Rollback() return err } return tx.Commit().Error }database/orm/orm_test.go (2)
35-35: Fix grammatical error in skip messageThe current message "Skip test that using Docker" contains grammatical errors. Consider using one of these alternatives:
- "Skip tests that use Docker"
- "Skipping tests using Docker"
- t.Skip("Skip test that using Docker") + t.Skip("Skip tests that use Docker")
63-67: Consider cleaning up all database types in TearDownSuiteWhile the current implementation handles SQLite cleanup, consider extending this to clean up containers for all database types to ensure comprehensive resource management.
func (s *OrmSuite) TearDownSuite() { - if s.testQueries[database.DriverSqlite] != nil { - s.NoError(s.testQueries[database.DriverSqlite].Docker().Stop()) + for driver, query := range s.testQueries { + if query != nil && query.Docker() != nil { + s.NoError(query.Docker().Stop()) + } } }database/factory/factory_test.go (1)
98-98: Fix grammatical error in skip messageThe skip message contains a grammatical error. Consider using one of these alternatives:
- "Skip test using Docker"
- "Skip tests using Docker"
- "Skipping test that uses Docker"
-t.Skip("Skip test that using Docker") +t.Skip("Skip tests using Docker")testing/docker/database_test.go (2)
112-113: Consider adding container reuse verificationThe assertions correctly verify database creation and cleanup. However, given the PR's objective of container reuse, consider adding assertions to verify that containers are actually being reused across test cases.
assert.NotNil(t, gotDatabase) assert.NoError(t, gotDatabase.Stop()) +// Verify container reuse +firstContainerID := gotDatabase.ContainerID() +secondDatabase, _ := NewDatabase(mockApp, tt.connection) +assert.Equal(t, firstContainerID, secondDatabase.ContainerID(), "Container should be reused") +assert.NoError(t, secondDatabase.Stop())
Line range hint
1-163: Consider implementing container info persistenceWhile the changes improve container management, the PR objective of saving container information to a temp file isn't fully implemented yet. Consider adding a mechanism to persist container information across test runs, perhaps using a singleton pattern or file-based storage.
Example approach:
- Create a container info manager that handles reading/writing to temp files
- Store container IDs and connection details
- Implement cleanup on process exit
This would further optimize test execution by enabling container reuse across different test packages.
Would you like me to provide a detailed implementation proposal for the container persistence mechanism?
database/schema/schema_test.go (3)
22-22: Fix grammatical error in skip message.The skip message contains grammatical errors.
-t.Skip("Skip test that using Docker") +t.Skip("Skip tests that use Docker")
Line range hint
89-90: Consider tracking TODO comments.There are multiple TODO comments for unimplemented features (DropAllTypes and DropAllViews). Consider creating GitHub issues to track these implementations.
Would you like me to help create GitHub issues for tracking these TODO items?
Also applies to: 93-94
The commented-out tests are for unimplemented functionality
Based on the evidence from the codebase:
- The methods
HasColumn,GetColumns, andHasColumnsare not defined in any of the schema interfaces (Schema,CommonSchema,DriverSchema)- While there are some test files that reference these methods, there are no actual implementations found
- Only test stubs exist in
postgres_test.goandsqlite_test.goforGetColumnsRecommendation:
- Create an issue to track the implementation of these column-related operations
- Remove the commented-out tests from
schema_test.goand move them to the issue for reference- Re-implement these tests once the actual functionality is developed
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
186-241: Review commented-out test cases.There are extensive commented-out test cases for column operations. Consider either:
- Implementing these tests now if the functionality exists
- Creating a separate issue to track their implementation
- Removing them if they're no longer relevant
This will help maintain cleaner test files and ensure all functionality is properly tested.
Let's check if these column operations are implemented:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if column operations are implemented in the schema package # Search for HasColumn implementation ast-grep --pattern 'func $_($$) HasColumn($_, $_) bool' # Search for GetColumns implementation ast-grep --pattern 'func $_($$) GetColumns($_)' # Search for HasColumns implementation ast-grep --pattern 'func $_($$) HasColumns($_, $_) bool'Length of output: 166
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach using ripgrep to search for these method implementations # Search for HasColumn implementation echo "=== Searching for HasColumn implementation ===" rg -l "HasColumn" --type go # Search for GetColumns implementation echo -e "\n=== Searching for GetColumns implementation ===" rg -l "GetColumns" --type go # Search for HasColumns implementation echo -e "\n=== Searching for HasColumns implementation ===" rg -l "HasColumns" --type go # Let's also check the interface definition echo -e "\n=== Checking Schema interface definition ===" rg "type Schema interface" -A 10 --type goLength of output: 1530
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the CommonSchema and DriverSchema interfaces since they might contain these methods echo "=== Checking CommonSchema interface ===" rg "type CommonSchema interface" -A 15 --type go echo -e "\n=== Checking DriverSchema interface ===" rg "type DriverSchema interface" -A 15 --type go # Let's also check if these methods are actually implemented somewhere echo -e "\n=== Checking actual implementations ===" rg "func.*HasColumn" -A 2 --type go rg "func.*GetColumns" -A 2 --type go rg "func.*HasColumns" -A 2 --type goLength of output: 3261
database/gorm/to_sql_test.go (3)
23-23: Fix grammatical error in skip messageThe current skip message has grammatical issues. Consider using one of these alternatives:
- "Skipping tests that use Docker" (original)
- "Skip tests using Docker"
- t.Skip("Skip test that using Docker") + t.Skip("Skipping tests that use Docker")
30-33: Improve error handling for container initializationThe explicit readiness check is good, but we should also handle potential errors from container creation.
Consider adding error handling for container creation:
- postgresDocker := docker.Postgres() + postgresDocker, err := docker.Postgres() + s.Require().NoError(err) s.Require().NoError(postgresDocker.Ready())
30-33: Implementation aligns well with PR objectivesThe refactored container setup supports the PR's goal of optimizing test execution by enabling container reuse. The separation of container creation and readiness check provides better control over the setup process.
Consider documenting the container reuse strategy in the test suite's comments to help other contributors understand the optimization approach.
foundation/application.go (1)
309-309: Consider documenting path resolution behavior.Since the root path resolution is critical for container file management and affects the PR's goal of optimizing test performance, consider:
- Adding documentation about the expected behavior of
env.CurrentAbsolutePath()in different environments (local dev, CI, tests)- Including examples of how temporary container files will be resolved relative to the root path
- Documenting any environment-specific considerations for path resolution
This will help maintainers understand the implications of path resolution on container management.
foundation/application_test.go (1)
312-312: Fix grammatical issue in skip messageThe current skip message has grammatical issues. Consider using one of these alternatives:
- "Skip test that uses Docker"
- "Skip test that is using Docker"
- "Skipping test that uses Docker"
- s.T().Skip("Skip test that using Docker") + s.T().Skip("Skip test that uses Docker")database/migration/default_migrator_test.go (3)
Line range hint
56-86: Consider adding test cases for container reuse scenariosWhile the existing test coverage is comprehensive, consider adding specific test cases to verify:
- Multiple test cases using the same container instance
- Database name uniqueness when reusing containers
- Cleanup of databases after tests
This would help validate the new container reuse functionality introduced in this PR.
Line range hint
644-668: Enhance error handling in mock implementationsConsider improving the error handling in the mock implementations by:
- Adding context to errors for better debugging
- Handling container-specific errors separately
- Adding cleanup mechanisms for failed operations
This would make test failures more informative and help with debugging container-related issues.
Based on the code analysis, I can now provide a final response:
Container lifecycle needs improvement for better reuse
The current implementation has some issues that could affect test performance:
- Multiple
Ready()checks are being performed on the same container instance- No explicit cleanup/teardown logic in
TearDownTest()- Container is initialized in
SetupTest()which runs before each test, potentially creating new containers unnecessarilyTo optimize container reuse:
- Move container initialization to
SetupSuite()- Add proper cleanup in
TearDownSuite()- Remove redundant
Ready()checks🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-900: Verify performance improvements from container reuseThe changes look good overall. To validate the performance improvements:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Compare test execution times before and after the changes # Get the commit hash before these changes git log -n 1 --format=%H -- database/migration/default_migrator_test.go # Compare test execution times # Note: This will help verify if the container reuse strategy improves performance time go test -v ./database/migration/... -run TestDefaultMigratorWithDBSuiteLength of output: 300
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's verify the container reuse implementation in a different way # by checking the test structure and container lifecycle management # Check for container reuse patterns in the test implementation rg -A 5 -B 5 "SetupTest|TearDownTest" database/migration/default_migrator_test.go # Look for Docker container management code rg -A 3 "docker\." database/migration/default_migrator_test.go # Check if there are any explicit container cleanup calls rg "Ready\(\)|Stop\(\)|Close\(\)" database/migration/default_migrator_test.goLength of output: 1104
testing/docker/database.go (1)
48-50: Enhance error message when database driver is not ready.Including contextual information in the error message improves troubleshooting.
Apply this diff:
if err = databaseDriver.Ready(); err != nil { - return nil, err + return nil, fmt.Errorf("database driver not ready: %w", err) }support/docker/docker.go (1)
79-81: Correct typos in comments for better clarityThere are minor typos in the comments that can be corrected to improve readability and understanding.
Apply the following corrections:
// Create new database in the exist docker container + // Create new databases in the existing Docker container // Sqlite should be a new database, so we can return it directly. + // For SQLite, we should create a new database, so we can return it directly.support/docker/container_manager.go (1)
73-99: Remove or adjust verbose debugging statementsThere are numerous
color.Red().Printfstatements used for debugging purposes throughout the code. In production code, excessive logging can clutter the output and may impact performance. Consider removing these statements or using a configurable logging mechanism that can be enabled or disabled based on the environment.Apply this diff to remove the debug logs:
- color.Red().Printf("Test-%s--Get: Ready to set lock, containerType: %v, tempfile: %s\n", carbon.Now().ToDateTimeString(), containerType, r.file) - color.Red().Printf("Test-%s--Get: get all containers, %+v\n", carbon.Now().ToDateTimeString(), containerTypeToDatabaseConfig) - color.Red().Printf("Test-%s--Get: filtered containers, databaseDriver: %+v, containerType: %v\n", carbon.Now().ToDateTimeString(), databaseDriver, containerType) - color.Red().Printfln("Test-%s--Get: driver is empty, going to create new container: %s", carbon.Now().ToDateTimeString(), database) - color.Red().Printf("Test-%s--Get: created a new container, databaseDriver: %+v, containerType: %v\n", carbon.Now().ToDateTimeString(), databaseDriver, containerType) - color.Red().Printf("Test-%s--Get: going to add the new container\n", carbon.Now().ToDateTimeString()) - color.Red().Printf("Test-%s--add: get all containers: %+v, type: %v, databaseDriver: %+v\n", carbon.Now().ToDateTimeString(), containerTypeToDatabaseConfig, containerType, databaseDriver) - color.Red().Printf("Test-%s--add: new containers, type: %v, containerTypeToDatabaseConfig: %+v\n", carbon.Now().ToDateTimeString(), containerType, containerTypeToDatabaseConfig) - color.Red().Printf("Test-%s--unlock\n", carbon.Now().ToDateTimeString())Alternatively, implement a logging system with log levels to control the output based on the environment (e.g., development or production).
Also applies to: 101-105, 121-131, 213-217
database/gorm/test_utils.go (2)
54-56: Enhance panic messages with contextual information for better debuggingCurrently, when
supportdocker.Readyfails, the code panics with a generic error message. Adding contextual information to the panic messages will aid in identifying which Docker container failed to initialize.Apply the following changes:
if err := supportdocker.Ready(postgresDockers...); err != nil { - panic(err) + panic(fmt.Sprintf("Failed to initialize Postgres dockers: %v", err)) } if err := supportdocker.Ready(mysqlDockers...); err != nil { - panic(err) + panic(fmt.Sprintf("Failed to initialize MySQL dockers: %v", err)) } if err := supportdocker.Ready(sqlserverDockers...); err != nil { - panic(err) + panic(fmt.Sprintf("Failed to initialize SQLServer dockers: %v", err)) } if err := supportdocker.Ready(postgresDocker); err != nil { - panic(err) + panic(fmt.Sprintf("Failed to initialize Postgres docker: %v", err)) } if err := supportdocker.Ready(mysqlDocker); err != nil { - panic(err) + panic(fmt.Sprintf("Failed to initialize MySQL docker: %v", err)) } if err := supportdocker.Ready(sqlserverDocker); err != nil { - panic(err) + panic(fmt.Sprintf("Failed to initialize SQLServer docker: %v", err)) }Also applies to: 81-87, 113-115, 124-126, 137-141
272-280: RefactorReadWritemethods to eliminate code duplication across mock driversThe
ReadWritemethods inMockMysql,MockPostgres,MockSqlite, andMockSqlservershare similar code structures for setting up mock configurations. Refactoring these methods by extracting the common logic into a shared helper function will reduce code duplication and enhance maintainability.Also applies to: 343-350, 408-415, 471-478
database/gorm/query_test.go (9)
33-33: Consistency in Skip Message FormattingConsider rephrasing the skip message for clarity and grammatical correctness. The current message "Skip test that using Docker" can be improved.
Apply this diff to update the skip message:
- t.Skip("Skip test that using Docker") + t.Skip("Skipping test that uses Docker")
3547-3547: Avoid Shadowing Variables in Nested FunctionsIn the lambda function, the variable
queryis being used, which shadows the outerqueryvariable. This can lead to confusion and potential bugs.Apply this diff to rename the parameter:
- return query.Where("name = ?", "with_book0").Select("id", "user_id", "name") + return q.Where("name = ?", "with_book0").Select("id", "user_id", "name")And update the function signature accordingly:
With("Books", func(q contractsorm.Query) contractsorm.Query { // function body })
3598-3598: Consistency in Skip Message FormattingSimilar to line 33, consider updating the skip message for grammatical correctness.
Apply this diff:
- if env.IsWindows() { - t.Skip("Skip test that using Docker") + if env.IsWindows() { + t.Skip("Skipping test that uses Docker")
3602-3603: Provide Context in Error MessagesWhile using
require.NoError, it's helpful to include a descriptive message to provide context in case of failure.Update the assertion to include an error message:
- require.NoError(t, postgresDocker.Ready()) + require.NoError(t, postgresDocker.Ready(), "Failed to prepare PostgreSQL Docker container")
3640-3641: Stop All Docker Containers at the End of TestsEnsure that all started Docker containers are stopped at the end of the test to prevent resource leaks.
Apply this diff to stop the PostgreSQL Docker container as well:
+ assert.NoError(t, postgresDocker.Stop()) assert.NoError(t, sqliteDocker.Stop())
3764-3764: Consistency in Skip Message FormattingOnce again, update the skip message for clarity.
- if env.IsWindows() { - t.Skip("Skip test that using Docker") + if env.IsWindows() { + t.Skip("Skipping test that uses Docker")
3776-3778: Handle Errors Appropriately When Setting Up TestsIn
TestReadWriteSeparate, ensure that any errors returned byQueryOfReadWriteare properly handled and provide informative error messages.Update the error handling:
- mixQuery, err = db["write"].QueryOfReadWrite(db["read"].Docker().Config()) + mixQuery, err := db["write"].QueryOfReadWrite(db["read"].Docker().Config()) require.NoError(t, err, "Failed to create read-write query")
3810-3810: Consistency in Skip Message FormattingAgain, update the skip message for clarity.
- if env.IsWindows() { - t.Skip("Skip test that using Docker") + if env.IsWindows() { + t.Skip("Skipping test that uses Docker")
3828-3831: Safely Stop Docker Containers in TearDownWhen checking for
nil, it's best practice to prevent potential nil pointer dereferences.Apply this diff:
if dbs[database.DriverSqlite] != nil { - assert.NoError(t, dbs[database.DriverSqlite].Docker().Stop()) + if dbs[database.DriverSqlite].Docker() != nil { + assert.NoError(t, dbs[database.DriverSqlite].Docker().Stop()) + } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
mocks/testing/Database.gois excluded by!mocks/**mocks/testing/DatabaseDriver.gois excluded by!mocks/**
📒 Files selected for processing (37)
.gitignore(0 hunks)contracts/testing/testing.go(1 hunks)database/factory/factory_test.go(1 hunks)database/gorm/query_test.go(9 hunks)database/gorm/test_utils.go(8 hunks)database/gorm/to_sql_test.go(1 hunks)database/migration/default_migrator_test.go(2 hunks)database/migration/repository_test.go(1 hunks)database/migration/sql_migrator_test.go(2 hunks)database/orm/orm_test.go(2 hunks)database/schema/common_schema_test.go(1 hunks)database/schema/postgres_schema_test.go(1 hunks)database/schema/schema_test.go(3 hunks)foundation/application.go(2 hunks)foundation/application_test.go(1 hunks)foundation/path.go(0 hunks)mail/application_test.go(1 hunks)queue/application_test.go(1 hunks)support/docker/container_manager.go(1 hunks)support/docker/container_manager_test.go(1 hunks)support/docker/docker.go(2 hunks)support/docker/docker_test.go(3 hunks)support/docker/mysql.go(4 hunks)support/docker/mysql_test.go(2 hunks)support/docker/postgres.go(5 hunks)support/docker/postgres_test.go(3 hunks)support/docker/redis_test.go(1 hunks)support/docker/sqlite.go(1 hunks)support/docker/sqlite_test.go(2 hunks)support/docker/sqlserver.go(4 hunks)support/docker/sqlserver_test.go(2 hunks)support/docker/utils.go(2 hunks)support/docker/utils_test.go(1 hunks)support/env/env.go(3 hunks)testing/docker/database.go(1 hunks)testing/docker/database_test.go(5 hunks)testing/docker/docker_test.go(4 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- .gitignore
- foundation/path.go
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- mail/application_test.go
- queue/application_test.go
- support/docker/redis_test.go
- support/docker/utils_test.go
🔇 Additional comments (43)
database/schema/common_schema_test.go (1)
29-30: LGTM! Good addition of container readiness check
The added Docker readiness check is a crucial improvement that:
- Ensures the container is fully operational before running tests
- Helps prevent flaky tests due to container initialization timing
- Aligns with the PR's objective of optimizing container usage
The empty line after the check also improves code readability.
database/schema/postgres_schema_test.go (1)
32-33: LGTM! Good addition of container readiness check
The Docker readiness check is a crucial addition that ensures the container is properly initialized before test execution. This aligns well with the PR's objective of optimizing container management.
Let's verify consistent readiness checks across other test files:
✅ Verification successful
Docker readiness checks are consistently implemented across test files
The verification shows that all test files using Docker properly implement readiness checks after container initialization. The pattern is consistently followed in all locations:
- All test suites use
postgresDocker.Ready()immediately after container creation - Error handling is appropriately implemented using either
Require().NoError()orNoError() - The only variation is in
database/gorm/test_utils.gowhich uses a helpersupportdocker.Ready(), but maintains the same error checking pattern
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other test files properly implement Docker readiness checks
# Expected: Find other test files that use Docker and verify they have similar checks
# Search for test files using Docker
rg -l "docker\.Postgres\(\)" --type go | while read -r file; do
echo "=== Checking $file ==="
# Show context around Docker initialization to verify readiness checks
rg -B 2 -A 2 "docker\.Postgres\(\)" "$file"
done
Length of output: 3614
contracts/testing/testing.go (3)
25-26: LGTM! Clear documentation improvement
The enhanced documentation clearly explains the Build method's behavior and its relationship with the Ready method, which helps prevent misuse.
32-33: Documentation position update looks good
38-39: Essential addition for container lifecycle management
The Ready method is a crucial addition that enables proper container state management. This separation of concerns between building and readiness checking is a good design pattern.
Let's verify that all implementations of DatabaseDriver properly implement this new method:
✅ Verification successful
The previous ast-grep pattern might have been too strict. Let's try a broader search to:
- Identify all DatabaseDriver implementations
- Find Ready method implementations with surrounding context
Ready method is properly implemented across all database drivers
The verification shows that the Ready method is correctly implemented in:
- All database implementations (Postgres, MySQL, SQLite, SQLServer)
- Mock implementations for testing
- Each implementation follows a consistent pattern of checking connection status
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Ready method implementations in database drivers
ast-grep --pattern 'func ($x *$type) Ready() error {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 63
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find all database driver implementations
rg -l "type.*DatabaseDriver" --type go
# Then search for Ready method implementations with more context
rg "func.*Ready\(\).*error" --type go -A 5
Length of output: 1724
support/docker/sqlite.go (4)
33-35: LGTM!
The Config implementation correctly returns the database configuration.
48-48: LGTM!
The Driver method correctly returns the SQLite driver type.
68-71: LGTM!
The Ready method correctly verifies database connectivity.
82-83: LGTM!
The connect method correctly establishes database connection with multi-statement support.
support/docker/utils.go (1)
20-31: Verify integration with container management system
Let's ensure the port management changes properly integrate with the container reuse mechanism described in the PR objectives.
Also applies to: 50-50
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the container management integration by checking the implementation details.
Let me check one more aspect to verify the port management integration.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Port management is properly integrated with container reuse system
The port management implementation in isPortUsing is correctly integrated with the container management system:
- The
ContainerManagerchecks port availability before container reuse throughisPortUsing(containerTypeToDatabaseConfig[containerType].Port) - Dynamic port allocation is handled by
getValidPort()which ensures no port conflicts - The port configuration is properly persisted in
DatabaseConfigand restored when reusing containers - Container creation properly manages port mappings and configurations across different database types (MySQL, Postgres, SQLServer)
The implementation ensures proper port management for both new and reused containers, supporting the PR's container reuse objectives.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for proper container port management across the codebase
# Look for container creation patterns
echo "Checking container creation patterns..."
rg -l "docker run.*-p" --type go
# Check for port conflict handling
echo "Checking port conflict handling..."
rg "net.Listen|getValidPort|isPortUsing" --type go
# Verify test setup patterns
echo "Checking test container setup..."
rg "func.*Test.*Container" --type go
Length of output: 1694
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check container manager implementation and port usage
echo "Container manager implementation:"
rg -A 5 "containerTypeToDatabaseConfig" support/docker/container_manager.go
echo "\nPort allocation in container creation:"
ast-grep --pattern 'func createContainer($$$) {
$$$
}'
echo "\nContainer reuse logic:"
rg -A 10 "reuseContainer|getContainer" support/docker/container_manager.go
Length of output: 2755
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check port management in container creation and test setup
echo "Port management in utils.go:"
rg -A 10 "getValidPort" support/docker/utils.go
echo "\nContainer creation and port setup:"
rg -A 10 "func.*Create.*Container" --type go
echo "\nTest container configuration:"
rg -A 5 "DatabaseConfig|Port:" --type go
Length of output: 20691
support/docker/docker_test.go (3)
14-14: LGTM! Clear and concise skip message.
84-84: Verify handling of removed database parameters.
The Database function calls no longer include testDatabase, testUsername, and testPassword parameters.
#!/bin/bash
# Search for where these parameters are now handled
ast-grep --pattern 'func Database($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Look for configuration or environment variable usage
rg -l "testDatabase|testUsername|testPassword" --type goAlso applies to: 87-87
91-95: Clarify SQLite-specific cleanup strategy.
While proper cleanup is implemented for SQLite drivers, it's unclear why similar cleanup isn't performed for other database types. This could lead to resource leaks.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the evidence gathered, I can now provide a final response:
SQLite cleanup in tests is appropriate and intentional
The SQLite-specific cleanup is correct because:
- Other database types (MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLServer) use Docker containers that are automatically cleaned up by the Docker daemon
- Only SQLite creates actual files on the filesystem that need explicit cleanup
- The implementation shows all database types have
Stop()methods, but calling them in tests is only necessary for SQLite to remove temporary files
This is verified by:
- All database implementations having proper
Stop()methods (from ripgrep results) - SQLite's unique implementation that removes files instead of stopping containers
- Other databases using Docker containers that get cleaned up automatically
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for cleanup patterns in other database implementations
rg -A 5 "func.*Stop\(\)" --type go
# Look for other cleanup mechanisms
ast-grep --pattern 'driver.Stop($$$)'
Length of output: 3627
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the test file to understand the context better
cat support/docker/docker_test.go
Length of output: 2137
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the Database function to understand how containers are managed
cat support/docker/database.go
Length of output: 91
support/docker/mysql_test.go (2)
22-23: LGTM! Skip condition and message update looks good.
The updated skip condition and standardized skip message align well with the changes made across other test files.
72-74: Verify database isolation in the shared container.
The test for retrieving a new database driver is crucial for the container reuse feature. However, we should ensure proper database isolation.
Let's verify the isolation by checking if the test creates separate databases:
Consider adding additional test cases to verify:
- Concurrent access to different databases in the same container
- Data isolation between databases
- Cleanup of created databases after tests
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response:
Database isolation is properly implemented in the shared container setup
The codebase shows proper database isolation through:
- Each database instance gets a unique name parameter via
Database(name string)method - Separate database drivers are created for each database name
- The implementation in
mysql.go,postgres.go, and other drivers shows proper container reuse with isolated database instances
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the code properly isolates databases when sharing containers
# Expected: Find evidence of database name generation and isolation logic
# Look for database creation/isolation logic
rg -A 5 "Database\(" --type go
# Check for random/unique database name generation
ast-grep --pattern 'func $_(name string) (DatabaseDriver, error) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 15609
support/docker/postgres_test.go (1)
28-28: LGTM! Clear and consistent skip message.
The skip message follows the standardized format mentioned in the summary and clearly indicates why the test is being skipped.
support/docker/container_manager_test.go (2)
1-9: LGTM! Package structure and imports are well-organized.
The imports are appropriate for the testing requirements, including the necessary testing frameworks and environment utilities.
46-80: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve test data management and handle potential race conditions.
The test has several areas for improvement:
- Hardcoded values (port 5432, containerID "123456") should be defined as constants or test fixtures.
- Using a fixed port number could cause test failures if the port is already in use.
- Consider adding negative test cases (e.g., adding duplicate containers).
Suggested improvements:
+const (
+ testPort = 5432
+ testContainerID = "123456"
+)
+
func (s *ContainerManagerTestSuite) TestAddAndAll() {
- port := 5432
- containerID := "123456"
+ port := testPort
+ containerID := testContainerIDLet's verify if the port is commonly used in other tests:
support/env/env.go (1)
22-25: LGTM! Clean and standard implementations
The system property detection functions are well-implemented using the standard runtime package constants.
Also applies to: 49-53, 66-69
testing/docker/docker_test.go (2)
12-12: LGTM: Import added for environment detection
The added import is necessary for the new Windows environment check functionality.
54-54: Verify database cleanup strategy aligns with container reuse goal
The addition of database.Stop() calls might conflict with the PR's objective of reusing containers across tests. We need to verify that these Stop() calls only clean up the test database within the container rather than destroying the container itself.
Let's verify the implementation of the Stop() method:
Consider these architectural points:
- The container manager should handle container lifecycle
- Individual tests should only clean up their test databases
- Container shutdown should happen at the end of the entire test suite
Also applies to: 75-75
support/docker/postgres.go (3)
60-69: LGTM! Config structure is well-organized.
The Config method properly returns all necessary connection details.
121-128: LGTM! Connection check is well-implemented.
The Ready method effectively verifies database connectivity with proper resource cleanup.
Line range hint 44-58: LGTM! Verify container reuse functionality.
The Build method correctly initializes the container and handles errors appropriately.
Let's verify that containers are being reused across test runs:
✅ Verification successful
Container reuse is properly implemented, Build method is correct
The Build method in PostgresImpl works correctly with the container reuse mechanism implemented in ContainerManager. The ContainerManager handles container lifecycle by:
- Caching container information in a temporary file
- Reusing existing containers if their ports are still in use
- Creating new containers with random database names when needed
- Using file-based locking to prevent race conditions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for container reuse patterns in tests
# Look for test files that might use this postgres implementation
rg -l "NewPostgresImpl" --type go
# Check for potential container leaks - containers that might not be properly stopped
rg -B 2 -A 2 "docker stop" --type go
Length of output: 1459
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the container manager implementation for reuse patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'func $_ ContainerManager {
$$$
}'
# Check test files for container reuse patterns
rg -A 5 "NewPostgresImpl" support/docker/container_manager_test.go
rg -A 5 "NewPostgresImpl" testing/docker/database_test.go
# Check if there's a cleanup mechanism in tests
rg "defer.*Stop\(\)" --type go
Length of output: 605
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual implementation of container reuse logic
rg -B 2 -A 5 "func.*Build\(\)" support/docker/postgres.go
# Check if there's any container caching/reuse mechanism
rg -l "container.*cache|reuse" --type go
# Check the container manager implementation
cat support/docker/container_manager.go
Length of output: 7301
support/docker/mysql.go (4)
13-13: LGTM!
The color package addition is appropriate for error logging in the async database creation process.
66-74: LGTM!
The addition of ContainerID to the config is well-structured and supports the container reuse strategy.
108-108: LGTM!
The Driver method correctly returns the MySQL driver type.
Line range hint 50-61: Verify container ID persistence across test runs.
The containerID storage is crucial for the container reuse strategy. Ensure it persists correctly across different test packages.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about how the containerID is being used and managed.
Let me check one more aspect about the container lifecycle management.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Container ID persistence is properly implemented and managed
The containerID is:
- Stored as a field in database driver structs (MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLServer, Redis)
- Properly assigned during container creation in the Build() method
- Passed through DatabaseConfig for container management
- Reused when creating new database instances via the Database() method
- Properly handled during container cleanup via Stop() methods
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the containerID is being stored in a persistent location
rg -A 5 "containerID.*:=.*"
Length of output: 1896
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for container management and cleanup related code
ast-grep --pattern 'func $$$Stop($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Check for container reuse logic
rg -B 3 -A 3 "containerID" --type go
Length of output: 11111
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for container manager implementation and lifecycle management
rg -B 5 -A 5 "type ContainerManager" --type go
# Check for container cleanup/teardown logic
rg -B 3 -A 3 "func.*Teardown|func.*Cleanup" --type go
Length of output: 1437
support/docker/sqlserver.go (4)
Line range hint 42-56: LGTM! Build method implementation is solid.
The method properly handles container creation with appropriate error checking and port mapping.
58-67: LGTM! Config method now includes container tracking.
The addition of ContainerID in the config aligns with the PR's objective of container reuse across test cases.
108-116: LGTM! Ready check implementation is clean and efficient.
The Ready method effectively leverages the existing connect method which includes retry logic, making it robust for container readiness checking.
69-75: Implementation aligns perfectly with container reuse strategy.
The method enables multiple test databases to share the same container instance, which directly addresses the PR's goal of improving test performance.
✅ Verification successful
The search results show that the Database method is consistently implemented across all database drivers (MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLServer, SQLite) and is being used correctly in their respective test files. The implementation follows the same pattern of sharing container details while allowing different database names. Let me verify the interface implementation to ensure complete consistency.
Implementation is correctly aligned with the DatabaseDriver interface and container reuse strategy
The verification confirms that:
- The
Database(name string)method is properly defined in theDatabaseDriverinterface - All database implementations (MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLServer, SQLite) correctly implement this method with consistent behavior
- Test files demonstrate proper usage of the method for creating multiple database instances sharing the same container
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the Database method is used consistently across test files
rg -p "Database\([^)]+\)" --type go
Length of output: 2819
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the DatabaseDriver interface definition and its implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'type DatabaseDriver interface {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 1391
database/orm/orm_test.go (1)
63-67: Verify container reuse implementation
While this cleanup implementation is important, let's verify that the container reuse logic exists to fulfill the PR's objective of optimizing test speed.
database/factory/factory_test.go (1)
105-108: LGTM! Well-structured container initialization
The explicit readiness check before query creation is a good practice that aligns with the PR's objective to optimize database container management. This approach ensures the container is fully ready before proceeding with tests, preventing potential race conditions.
testing/docker/database_test.go (4)
26-28: LGTM: Good practice to skip Docker tests on Windows
The addition of the Windows environment check is a good practice to prevent test failures in environments where Docker might not be available or behave differently.
147-147: LGTM: Consistent skip message
The skip message format is consistent with other similar checks in the file.
163-163: LGTM: Important cleanup in error path
Excellent addition of cleanup in the error path. This prevents resource leaks by ensuring the database is properly stopped even when the build fails.
48-51: LGTM: Test structure simplified while maintaining coverage
The test case structure has been streamlined to focus on essential validations while still maintaining comprehensive coverage across different database types.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the git diff output showing test files, I can see that these are test case additions and improvements across various packages. The changes are focused on test coverage and do not indicate any issues with the test structure changes in testing/docker/database_test.go. The test case structure has been simplified while maintaining comprehensive test coverage.
Test structure changes are well-tested and maintain coverage
The test case structure changes are accompanied by extensive test coverage across different database types and scenarios, as evidenced by the numerous test cases added in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify test coverage hasn't decreased
# Look for any removed test assertions in git history
git log -p HEAD^..HEAD | grep -B5 -A5 'assert\.'
Length of output: 235337
database/schema/schema_test.go (1)
31-31: LGTM! Good practice to ensure Docker readiness.
Adding a readiness check for PostgreSQL Docker instance is a good practice that aligns with the PR objectives of optimizing container management.
foundation/application.go (2)
18-18: LGTM: Import aligns with centralization of path utilities.
The addition of the env package import supports the centralization of path-related functionality, improving code organization.
309-309: Verify path resolution behavior across environments.
The switch to env.CurrentAbsolutePath() is part of centralizing path resolution logic. Since this affects the core application root path, which is critical for various operations including container management, we should verify its behavior across different environments.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the results and generate additional verification scripts to understand the implementation of env.CurrentAbsolutePath().
Based on the results, I can now provide a final response as we have sufficient information about the path resolution implementation.
Path resolution behavior is properly handled across environments
The implementation in env.CurrentAbsolutePath() has appropriate handling for different execution contexts:
- Uses
os.Executable()as the primary source for path resolution - Falls back to
os.Getwd()for special cases:- Testing environments
- Air live reload
- Direct
go runexecution
- Resolves symlinks correctly using
filepath.EvalSymlinks
The behavior is consistent with the framework's needs and properly handles various execution environments. The change is safe.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of RootPath in the codebase to ensure compatibility
# Check for direct RootPath usage
echo "Checking direct RootPath usage..."
rg "support\.RootPath" -B 2 -A 2
# Check for ExecutablePath method usage which depends on RootPath
echo "Checking ExecutablePath usage..."
rg "ExecutablePath" -B 2 -A 2
# Look for potential test files that might be affected
echo "Checking test files that might use paths..."
fd -e test.go | xargs rg "RootPath|ExecutablePath" -l
Length of output: 5355
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of CurrentAbsolutePath
echo "Checking CurrentAbsolutePath implementation..."
rg "CurrentAbsolutePath" -B 5 -A 5
# Check test coverage for path resolution
echo "Checking path resolution tests..."
rg "TestCurrentAbsolutePath|TestRootPath" -B 2 -A 5
# Check for any environment-specific path handling
echo "Checking environment-specific path handling..."
rg "os\.(Getwd|Executable)" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 5266
foundation/application_test.go (1)
316-317: LGTM! Important readiness check added
Good addition of the Docker readiness check. This ensures the database container is properly initialized before proceeding with the test, which is crucial for the new container reuse strategy.
database/migration/default_migrator_test.go (1)
38-38: LGTM: Container readiness check is properly implemented
The addition of the container readiness check aligns with the PR objectives to optimize container usage during tests. This ensures that the database container is fully operational before proceeding with the tests.
Also applies to: 47-48
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
support/docker/sqlite.go (3)
38-45: Enhance error handling in Database methodThe error handling could be more specific to help with debugging.
Consider this improvement:
func (r *SqliteImpl) Database(name string) (testing.DatabaseDriver, error) { sqliteImpl := NewSqliteImpl(name) if err := sqliteImpl.Build(); err != nil { - return nil, err + return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to build SQLite database '%s': %v", name, err) } return sqliteImpl, nil }
51-56: Enhance error handling in Fresh methodThe error handling could be more specific for the Stop() error.
Consider this improvement:
func (r *SqliteImpl) Fresh() error { if err := r.Stop(); err != nil { - return err + return fmt.Errorf("failed to stop SQLite database during fresh: %v", err) } if _, err := r.connect(); err != nil { return fmt.Errorf("connect Sqlite error when freshing: %v", err) } return nil }
63-64: Consider removing unnecessary Image methodThe
Imagemethod is unnecessary for SQLite implementation as it doesn't use Docker containers. This appears to be technical debt from implementing a common interface with other database drivers that do use Docker.Consider:
- Splitting the interface into
DatabaseDriverandContainerizedDatabaseDriver- Moving Docker-specific methods like
ImagetoContainerizedDatabaseDriver- Having SQLite implement only the base
DatabaseDriverinterfaceThis would make the architecture cleaner and more aligned with the actual requirements of each database type.
support/env/env.go (1)
11-20: Consider making the path detection more robustThe current implementation has a few potential issues:
- The hardcoded path "/storage/temp" might not work consistently across different platforms
- Using string contains for path comparison could lead to false positives
Consider this more robust implementation:
func IsAir() bool { for _, arg := range os.Args { - if strings.Contains(filepath.ToSlash(arg), "/storage/temp") { + normalized := filepath.ToSlash(arg) + // Air typically uses a temp directory with a specific pattern + if strings.Contains(normalized, "/storage/temp") || + strings.Contains(normalized, "tmp/air") { return true } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
support/docker/container_manager.go(1 hunks)support/docker/sqlite.go(1 hunks)support/docker/sqlite_test.go(2 hunks)support/env/env.go(3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- support/docker/container_manager.go
- support/docker/sqlite_test.go
🔇 Additional comments (2)
support/docker/sqlite.go (1)
66-69: LGTM! Implementation aligns with PR objectives
The Ready method correctly implements the readiness check by attempting a connection, which aligns with the PR's goal of ensuring database availability before tests.
support/env/env.go (1)
88-105: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Critical: Improve error handling and add context
The current implementation has critical issues that were partially addressed in previous reviews. Additionally:
- The special handling for test/Air/direct run environments needs documentation explaining the rationale
- The error handling needs to be consistent across all code paths
The error handling issues were previously flagged. Please refer to the existing review comments for the suggested fixes.
Add documentation explaining the environment-specific behavior:
+// CurrentAbsolutePath returns the absolute path of the current executable.
+// In test, Air, or direct run environments, it returns the working directory instead
+// of the executable path. This is necessary because:
+// - In test environments: The executable is in a temporary test directory
+// - In Air: The executable is in Air's temporary directory
+// - In direct run: The executable is in Go's build cache
+// This ensures that file paths are resolved relative to the project root in these environments.
func CurrentAbsolutePath() string {
📑 Description
Closes goravel/goravel#519
Previously, we created a new db container for every test case, hence there are multiple same database type containers, initiating each container will spend a lot of time, the test speed in local and CI is plodding.
Currently, one database type only builds one docker container, the docker container will be saved in a temp file, it can be fetched when needed, and each test case will create its own database in the same container, the test speed will be faster.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
ContainerManagerfor managing Docker containers for various databases.Improvements
Bug Fixes
Chores
✅ Checks