fix: [#450] The image rule of validation is wrong #84
Conversation
hwbrzzl
changed the title
WalkthroughThe update enhances the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumlogo.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
Files selected for processing (5)
- .github/workflows/test.yml (2 hunks)
- context_request.go (1 hunks)
- go.mod (1 hunks)
- renovate.json (1 hunks)
- route_test.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- go.mod
- renovate.json
Additional comments not posted (2)
route_test.go (2)
465-470: Ensure theFileImageJsonstruct fields are correctly defined.The fields
FileandImageshould be properly validated as file headers.type FileImageJson struct { Name string `form:"name" json:"name"` File *multipart.FileHeader `form:"file" json:"file"` Image *multipart.FileHeader `form:"image" json:"image"` Json string `form:"json" json:"json"` }
472-474: LGTM! The authorization method is correctly defined.The
Authorizemethod returns nil, indicating no authorization logic is required.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
context_request.go (2)
394-398: Consider adding logging for data retrieval errors.Adding logging for errors when setting queries in
dataFacecan help in debugging.- if _, err := dataFace.Set(key, query); err != nil { - return nil, err + if _, err := dataFace.Set(key, query); err != nil { + r.log.Error(fmt.Sprintf("Error setting query %s: %v", key, err)) + return nil, err }
402-407: Consider adding logging for data retrieval errors.Adding logging for errors when setting parameters in
dataFacecan help in debugging.- if _, err := dataFace.Set(key, param); err != nil { - return nil, err + if _, err := dataFace.Set(key, param); err != nil { + r.log.Error(fmt.Sprintf("Error setting parameter %s: %v", key, err)) + return nil, err }
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumlogo.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
Files selected for processing (5)
- .github/workflows/test.yml (2 hunks)
- context_request.go (1 hunks)
- go.mod (1 hunks)
- renovate.json (1 hunks)
- route_test.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- .github/workflows/test.yml
- go.mod
- renovate.json
Additional comments not posted (7)
context_request.go (1)
389-392: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
Validateare correctly handling the new data retrieval and error handling.Verification successful
Function usage correctly handles the new data retrieval and error handling.
The test cases consistently check for errors from the
Validatefunction and respond appropriately, confirming that the changes have been correctly implemented throughout the codebase.
- context_request_test.go: Verified correct error handling and validation checks.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `Validate` are correctly handling the new data retrieval and error handling. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new implementation. rg --type go $'Validate'Length of output: 6761
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract and review the relevant portions of the test cases to confirm the correct handling of the new Validate implementation. # Extract lines around the Validate function calls in context_request_test.go rg -C 3 'ctx.Request().Validate' context_request_test.goLength of output: 58
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract and review the relevant portions of the test cases to confirm the correct handling of the new Validate implementation. # Extract lines around the Validate function calls in context_request_test.go with broader context rg -C 5 'Validate' context_request_test.goLength of output: 11123
route_test.go (6)
465-470: LGTM! The struct definition looks good.The struct
FileImageJsonis defined correctly with appropriate fields.
472-474: LGTM! TheAuthorizemethod looks good.The
Authorizemethod correctly returnsnil.
485-487: LGTM! TheMessagesmethod looks good.The
Messagesmethod correctly returns an empty map.
489-491: LGTM! TheAttributesmethod looks good.The
Attributesmethod correctly returns an empty map.
493-495: LGTM! ThePrepareForValidationmethod looks good.The
PrepareForValidationmethod correctly returnsnil.
476-483: Ensure validation rules are appropriate.The validation rules for
FileImageJsonare defined correctly. However, verify that the rules match the expected use case.
|
@coderabbitai resolve |
Actions performedComments resolved. |
|
@coderabbitai review |
Actions performedReview triggered.
|
📑 Description
Closes goravel/goravel#450
✅ Checks
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
renovate.jsonfor automating dependency updates.FileImageJsonstruct with multiple methods for validation in routes.Updates
goversion matrix to include versions1.21and1.22for bothubuntuandwindowsworkflows.github.com/goravel/frameworkto versionv1.14.2ingo.mod.Refactors
ContextRequest.Validatemethod for improved error management.