-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
libwebsockets - html and http headers parsing fuzz targets #12852
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information. For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request. |
Segwaz is a new contributor to projects/libwebsockets. The PR must be approved by known contributors before it can be merged. The past contributors are: lws-team, autofuzzoss |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
just so I understand, are you a maintainer of libwebsockets? otherwise, could you reach out to maintainers to help them review the PR?
Ideally we should get these harnesses into the upstrem libwebsockets repository, could you please assist with this instead of landing the code here?
I am not a maintainer. I can make the necessary changes once they approve, provided there isn’t a specific reason to keep the current approach. |
Hi @lws-team , could you please review this PR and confirm if moving the harnesses into the upstream libwebsockets repository would be acceptable? |
Hi @lws-team , I wanted to follow up on this PR and share the updates I’ve made:
The PR has been updated accordingly. I’d greatly appreciate your feedback whenever you have the time. |
Extends fuzzing for
libwebsockets
to cover:lws_lhp_parse
)lws_parse
)Those additions increase static coverage from 2% to 42%.