Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JST-429: Gftp bugfix and refactor #612

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 9, 2023
Merged

Conversation

mgordel
Copy link
Contributor

@mgordel mgordel commented Oct 5, 2023

JST-429: Fixed gftp bug with incorrect initialization when there are no tasks in the executor.
Additionally, gftp has been refactored, getting rid of the old @rauschma/stringio dependency which has been replaced with native nodejs modules.

JST-429: Fixed gftp bug with incorrect initialization
when there are no tasks in the executor.
Additionally, gftp has been refactored,
getting rid of the old @rauschma/stringio dependency
which has been replaced with native nodejs modules.
Copy link
Contributor

@pgrzy-golem pgrzy-golem left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One thing I'm concerned about is the use of ? in declaration and later usage.
What this does is that it will silently ignore a lot of issues at runtime.

We should have a discussion about our coding style, and consider either using null values/default objects, or ! instead or choosing a completely different approach.

@mgordel
Copy link
Contributor Author

mgordel commented Oct 9, 2023

@pgrzy-golem I agree that it's not a very nice style, but in a situation where we initialize the object later after its creation, this will be a problem and will require refactoring of objects, so we can discuss it and agree on a common approach, but maybe as part of another task

@mgordel mgordel merged commit 5134530 into beta Oct 9, 2023
8 checks passed
@mgordel mgordel deleted the bugfix/JST-429/gftp-refactor branch October 9, 2023 09:49
@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 0.12.0-beta.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 0.12.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants