Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🔥 feat: Improve and Optimize ShutdownWithContext Func #3162

Open
wants to merge 29 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JIeJaitt
Copy link
Contributor

@JIeJaitt JIeJaitt commented Oct 10, 2024

Description

feat: Optimize ShutdownWithContext method in app.go

  • Reorder mutex lock acquisition to the start of the function
  • Early return if server is not running
  • Use defer for executing shutdown hooks
  • Simplify nil check for hooks
  • Remove TODO comment

This commit improves the readability, robustness, and execution order
of the shutdown process. It ensures consistent state throughout the
shutdown and guarantees hook execution even in error cases.

feat: Enhance ShutdownWithContext test for improved reliability

  • Add shutdown hook verification
  • Implement better synchronization with channels
  • Improve error handling and assertions
  • Adjust timeouts for more consistent results
  • Add server state check after shutdown attempt
  • Include comments explaining expected behavior

This commit improves the comprehensiveness and reliability of the ShutdownWithContext test, ensuring proper verification of shutdown hooks, timeout behavior, and server state during long-running requests.

Changes introduced

  • By holding the mutex lock throughout the operation, any modifications to the app's state are protected. defer ensures that the hook function is executed only after it is unlocked. At this time, no other goroutine will access the shared resource at the same time, ensuring concurrency safety.
  • defer ensures that the hook function will be executed regardless of whether an error occurs in the function. It also avoids execution order issues and further ensures concurrency safety.

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

Checklist

Before you submit your pull request, please make sure you meet these requirements:

  • Followed the inspiration of the Express.js framework for new functionalities, making them similar in usage.
  • Conducted a self-review of the code and provided comments for complex or critical parts.
  • Updated the documentation in the /docs/ directory for Fiber's documentation.
  • Added or updated unit tests to validate the effectiveness of the changes or new features.
  • Ensured that new and existing unit tests pass locally with the changes.
  • Verified that any new dependencies are essential and have been agreed upon by the maintainers/community.
  • Aimed for optimal performance with minimal allocations in the new code.
  • Provided benchmarks for the new code to analyze and improve upon.

Commit formatting

Please use emojis in commit messages for an easy way to identify the purpose or intention of a commit. Check out the emoji cheatsheet here: [CONTRIBUTING.md]( https://github.com/gofiber/fiber/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#pull -requests-or-commits)

Sorry, I just initiated the PR and saw this regulation. I will definitely add it in the next commit

yingjie.huang added 2 commits October 10, 2024 16:44
- Reorder mutex lock acquisition to the start of the function
- Early return if server is not running
- Use defer for executing shutdown hooks
- Simplify nil check for hooks
- Remove TODO comment

This commit improves the readability, robustness, and execution order
of the shutdown process. It ensures consistent state throughout the
shutdown and guarantees hook execution even in error cases.
- Add shutdown hook verification
- Implement better synchronization with channels
- Improve error handling and assertions
- Adjust timeouts for more consistent results
- Add server state check after shutdown attempt
- Include comments explaining expected behavior

This commit improves the comprehensiveness and reliability of the
ShutdownWithContext test, ensuring proper verification of shutdown
hooks, timeout behavior, and server state during long-running requests.
Copy link

welcome bot commented Oct 10, 2024

Thanks for opening this pull request! 🎉 Please check out our contributing guidelines. If you need help or want to chat with us, join us on Discord https://gofiber.io/discord

@JIeJaitt JIeJaitt changed the title Jiejaitt feature/improve shutdown with context Feature: Complete TODO and Optimize ShutdownWithContext Func Oct 10, 2024
@gaby gaby added v3 and removed ✏️ Feature labels Oct 10, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.87%. Comparing base (31a503f) to head (21169dc).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3162      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.77%   82.87%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files         114      114              
  Lines       11197    11197              
==========================================
+ Hits         9268     9279      +11     
+ Misses       1528     1520       -8     
+ Partials      401      398       -3     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 82.87% <100.00%> (+0.09%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

app_test.go Outdated
}()

<-clientDone
time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why do we need a sleep here? i think it's arbitrary since we already wait for clientDone channel

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why do we need a sleep here? i think it's arbitrary since we already wait for clientDone channel

This sleep is to ensure that our server has started processing the request. Although we have confirmed that the client has sent the request through <-clientDone, this means that the request has been sent to the server's listening port, and there is no guarantee that the server's processing coroutine has been sent. Start processing the request, so I think sleep 100 * Millisecond is required here as well.

app.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@JIeJaitt JIeJaitt marked this pull request as ready for review October 12, 2024 15:32
@JIeJaitt JIeJaitt requested a review from a team as a code owner October 12, 2024 15:32
@JIeJaitt JIeJaitt requested review from gaby, sixcolors, ReneWerner87 and efectn and removed request for a team October 12, 2024 15:32
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 12, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes enhance the Fiber web framework by introducing a new method New for creating an instance of App with customizable configuration options. The Listen method now accepts an optional ListenConfig parameter for server customization. Additionally, the ShutdownWithContext method has been updated to defer hook execution until after releasing the mutex lock, improving control flow during shutdown. Documentation has been expanded to provide detailed descriptions and examples for these new features, ensuring clarity for users.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
docs/api/fiber.md Updated documentation to include new New method, detailed Config structure, and examples for app instantiation and server listening.
app.go Updated ShutdownWithContext method to defer hook execution until after mutex lock is released and check server state before shutdown.
app_test.go Enhanced tests for ShutdownWithContext, added atomic operations for shutdown hook verification, and refined error handling during shutdown.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

☢️ Bug

Suggested reviewers

  • sixcolors
  • ReneWerner87
  • efectn

Poem

In the garden of code, changes bloom bright,
With hooks that now dance, in the soft moonlight.
Shutdowns are smoother, no more race to the end,
Documentation's richer, our framework's new friend.
So hop with delight, let the updates take flight! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@gaby gaby changed the title Feature: Complete TODO and Optimize ShutdownWithContext Func feat: Complete TODO and Optimize ShutdownWithContext Func Oct 12, 2024
@gaby gaby changed the title feat: Complete TODO and Optimize ShutdownWithContext Func feat: Improve and Optimize ShutdownWithContext Func Oct 12, 2024
…ub.com:JIeJaitt/fiber into jiejaitt-feature/improve-shutdown-with-context
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
docs/api/fiber.md (1)

208-208: Approve with minor suggestions for improvement

The added description for ShutdownWithContext is informative and aligns well with the PR objectives. It provides important details about the method's behavior, especially regarding the execution of shutdown hooks. To enhance clarity and readability, consider the following suggestions:

  1. Add a comma after "including" for better sentence structure.
  2. Split the long sentence into two for improved readability.

Here's a suggested revision:

- ShutdownWithContext shuts down the server including by force if the context's deadline is exceeded.Shutdown hooks will still be executed, even if an error occurs during the shutdown process, as they are deferred to ensure cleanup happens regardless of errors.
+ ShutdownWithContext shuts down the server, including by force if the context's deadline is exceeded. Shutdown hooks will still be executed, even if an error occurs during the shutdown process, as they are deferred to ensure cleanup happens regardless of errors.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~208-~208: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...es. ShutdownWithContext shuts down the server including by force if the context's dea...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9dd3d94 and 98fbdff.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • app.go (1 hunks)
  • app_test.go (1 hunks)
  • docs/api/fiber.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/api/fiber.md

[uncategorized] ~208-~208: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...es. ShutdownWithContext shuts down the server including by force if the context's dea...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
app.go (1)

846-855: Improved shutdown process with deferred hook execution

The changes to the ShutdownWithContext method enhance the shutdown process in several ways:

  1. Thread-safety is ensured by acquiring a mutex lock at the beginning of the method.
  2. A nil check for the server prevents potential panics if the server hasn't been initialized.
  3. The deferral of executeOnShutdownHooks guarantees that shutdown hooks are executed even if an error occurs during the shutdown process.

These improvements contribute to a more robust and reliable shutdown mechanism.

app_test.go Outdated
Comment on lines 897 to 900
ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), 1*time.Second)
defer cancel()
shutdownErr <- app.ShutdownWithContext(ctx)
}()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Ensure Proper Context Cancellation

The context created with context.WithTimeout should have its cancellation function deferred immediately to prevent potential resource leaks, even if an error occurs before the defer statement is reached.

Suggested Improvement

Move the defer cancel() directly after context creation.

	ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), 1*time.Second)
+	defer cancel()
	shutdownErr <- app.ShutdownWithContext(ctx)
-	defer cancel()
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), 1*time.Second)
defer cancel()
shutdownErr <- app.ShutdownWithContext(ctx)
}()
ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), 1*time.Second)
defer cancel()
shutdownErr <- app.ShutdownWithContext(ctx)
}()

app_test.go Outdated
Comment on lines 913 to 917
case err := <-serverErr:
assert.NoError(t, err, "Server should have shut down without error")
default:
// Server is still running, which is expected as the long-running request prevented full shutdown
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

⚠️ Potential issue

Avoid Skipping Server Error Handling

Using a default case in the select statement may cause the test to proceed without waiting for the server to shut down, potentially leading to flaky tests. It's important to handle the server error explicitly.

Suggested Fix: Remove the default Case

This ensures the test waits for serverErr to receive an error or completes the shutdown process.

	select {
	case err := <-serverErr:
		assert.NoError(t, err, "Server should have shut down without error")
-	default:
-		// Server is still running, which is expected as the long-running request prevented full shutdown
	}
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
case err := <-serverErr:
assert.NoError(t, err, "Server should have shut down without error")
default:
// Server is still running, which is expected as the long-running request prevented full shutdown
}
case err := <-serverErr:
assert.NoError(t, err, "Server should have shut down without error")

app_test.go Outdated
Comment on lines 863 to 867
shutdownHookCalled := false
app.Hooks().OnShutdown(func() error {
shutdownHookCalled = true
return nil
})
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Possible Data Race on shutdownHookCalled Variable

The shutdownHookCalled boolean is accessed by multiple goroutines without proper synchronization, which could lead to a data race. In Go, variables shared between goroutines should be protected using synchronization mechanisms like channels, mutexes, or atomic operations.

Suggested Fix: Use an Atomic Variable

Replace shutdownHookCalled with an int32 and use atomic.StoreInt32 and atomic.LoadInt32 for thread-safe operations.

+import "sync/atomic"

-	shutdownHookCalled := false
+	var shutdownHookCalled int32

	app.Hooks().OnShutdown(func() error {
-		shutdownHookCalled = true
+		atomic.StoreInt32(&shutdownHookCalled, 1)
		return nil
	})

	// ...

-	assert.True(t, shutdownHookCalled, "Shutdown hook was not called")
+	assert.Equal(t, int32(1), atomic.LoadInt32(&shutdownHookCalled), "Shutdown hook was not called")

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
docs/api/fiber.md (1)

208-208: Enhance documentation clarity and completeness

The current documentation could be improved in both grammar and completeness. Consider the following suggestions:

  1. Add a comma for better readability
  2. Improve the phrasing of the force shutdown description
  3. Include details about the mutex lock optimization

Apply this change to improve the documentation:

-ShutdownWithContext shuts down the server including by force if the context's deadline is exceeded. Shutdown hooks will still be executed, even if an error occurs during the shutdown process, as they are deferred to ensure cleanup happens regardless of errors.
+ShutdownWithContext shuts down the server, forcefully terminating if the context's deadline is exceeded. Shutdown hooks will still be executed, even if an error occurs during the shutdown process, as they are deferred to ensure cleanup happens regardless of errors. The method is optimized to acquire locks early, allowing for immediate return if the server is not running.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~208-~208: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...es. ShutdownWithContext shuts down the server including by force if the context's dea...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e0a56be and 750a7fa.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/api/fiber.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/api/fiber.md

[uncategorized] ~208-~208: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...es. ShutdownWithContext shuts down the server including by force if the context's dea...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)

JIeJaitt and others added 13 commits October 28, 2024 16:35
- Reorder mutex lock acquisition to the start of the function
- Early return if server is not running
- Use defer for executing shutdown hooks
- Simplify nil check for hooks
- Remove TODO comment

This commit improves the readability, robustness, and execution order
of the shutdown process. It ensures consistent state throughout the
shutdown and guarantees hook execution even in error cases.
- Add shutdown hook verification
- Implement better synchronization with channels
- Improve error handling and assertions
- Adjust timeouts for more consistent results
- Add server state check after shutdown attempt
- Include comments explaining expected behavior

This commit improves the comprehensiveness and reliability of the
ShutdownWithContext test, ensuring proper verification of shutdown
hooks, timeout behavior, and server state during long-running requests.
…ub.com:JIeJaitt/fiber into jiejaitt-feature/improve-shutdown-with-context
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 750a7fa and a32bddd.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • app.go (1 hunks)
  • app_test.go (2 hunks)
  • docs/api/fiber.md (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • docs/api/fiber.md
🔇 Additional comments (7)
app.go (2)

883-887: LGTM! Improved concurrency safety and error handling.

The changes correctly acquire the mutex lock at the start and add an early return if the server is not running. This prevents unnecessary processing and ensures thread safety.


888-892: LGTM! Robust shutdown hook execution.

The changes ensure that shutdown hooks are executed even if errors occur during shutdown by:

  1. Using defer to guarantee hook execution
  2. Adding a nil check for hooks
  3. Maintaining clean code structure with proper spacing
app_test.go (5)

23-23: Importing 'sync/atomic' for safe concurrency

The import of sync/atomic is appropriate to enable atomic operations on shared variables, ensuring thread safety in concurrent environments.


864-868: Proper use of atomic variables to avoid data races

The variable shutdownHookCalled is correctly declared as atomic.Int32, and atomic methods Store and Load are used to prevent data races, addressing previous concurrency concerns.


899-900: Proper placement of defer cancel() after context creation

Placing defer cancel() immediately after creating the context ensures that resources are released promptly, preventing potential leaks even if an error occurs.


905-909: Improved test reliability by removing the default case in select

By removing the default case, the test now correctly waits for either the shutdown to complete or the timeout to occur, ensuring accurate and reliable test behavior.


912-912: Correctly verifying shutdown hook execution

The assertion confirms that the shutdownHookCalled variable is set, verifying that the shutdown hook was indeed called during the shutdown process.

app_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@JIeJaitt JIeJaitt requested a review from gaby October 29, 2024 01:34
@JIeJaitt JIeJaitt changed the title feat: Improve and Optimize ShutdownWithContext Func 🔥 feat: Improve and Optimize ShutdownWithContext Func Nov 14, 2024
@ReneWerner87
Copy link
Member

false positive for the benchmark because of the same naming
benchmark-action/github-action-benchmark#264

@gaby can you check your last comments again to see if it is ready to merge

@ReneWerner87
Copy link
Member

@JIeJaitt can you make another comment in the whats new markdown?

@JIeJaitt
Copy link
Contributor Author

@JIeJaitt can you make another comment in the whats new markdown?

No problem, I will add it in what new later

@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 added this to the v3 milestone Nov 29, 2024
@ReneWerner87
Copy link
Member

@efectn @gaby pls check this PR

@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ Shutdown gracefully shuts down the server without interrupting any active connec

ShutdownWithTimeout will forcefully close any active connections after the timeout expires.

ShutdownWithContext shuts down the server including by force if the context's deadline is exceeded.
ShutdownWithContext shuts down the server including by force if the context's deadline is exceeded. Shutdown hooks will still be executed, even if an error occurs during the shutdown process, as they are deferred to ensure cleanup happens regardless of errors.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure about this behavior. I think we should only execute them during successful shutdown. Maybe we can OnShutdownError hook. What do you think @gaby @ReneWerner87

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure either. Also not sure about the defer of the hook

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would prefer to add Post Pre hook

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The add Post Pre hook is a good idea, but how do I tell which hooks are pre closed and which are post closed? @efectn

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can add new hook called PostShutdown, PreShutdown and replace the old one with them

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sound good, @JIeJaitt can you do the suggested change

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This means making a change below the type Hooks struct to add these two fields that mean PreShutdownHandler and PostShutdownHandler respectively , if I understand it correctly I'll try to implement it @ReneWerner87 @efectn @gaby

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This means making a change below the type Hooks struct to add these two fields that mean PreShutdownHandler and PostShutdownHandler respectively , if I understand it correctly I'll try to implement it @ReneWerner87 @efectn @gaby

Yes it is. You can also add err parameter to PostShutdown hook, so that we can also get rid of OnShutdownError, OnShutdownSuccess properties of ListenerConfig.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app_test.go (1)

913-918: Consider removing commented code

The commented default case on line 917 should be removed as it's no longer needed.

-	// default:
-	// Server is still running, which is expected as the long-running request prevented full shutdown
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a32bddd and 21169dc.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • app.go (1 hunks)
  • app_test.go (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • app.go
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
app_test.go (1)
Learnt from: efectn
PR: gofiber/fiber#3162
File: app_test.go:893-895
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T12:37:27.581Z
Learning: In the `Test_App_ShutdownWithContext` function in `app_test.go`, the `clientDone` channel is used to synchronize the client's request completion before proceeding, eliminating the need for additional `time.Sleep` calls.
🔇 Additional comments (6)
app_test.go (6)

24-24: LGTM: Import atomic package for thread-safe operations

The addition of the sync/atomic import is appropriate for implementing thread-safe operations in the test.


865-869: LGTM: Thread-safe shutdown hook tracking

The use of atomic.Int32 for tracking the shutdown hook call is a thread-safe approach, ensuring accurate state tracking in concurrent scenarios.


878-881: LGTM: Proper error handling with buffered channel

Using a buffered channel for server errors prevents potential goroutine leaks and ensures errors are properly captured.


885-891: LGTM: Proper client request setup with synchronization

The client request is properly set up with error handling and synchronization using a channel to signal completion.


894-896: Consider removing the sleep after clientDone

The sleep after the clientDone channel might be unnecessary since we already have synchronization through the channel.

Based on the past review comments and learnings, the clientDone channel is sufficient for synchronization, making the sleep redundant.


898-911: LGTM: Robust shutdown handling with timeout

The shutdown handling is well-implemented with:

  • Proper context timeout
  • Deferred context cancellation
  • Clear error assertions for timeout scenarios

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: No status
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants